Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Critical Evaluation of Advanced Oxidation Processes for Emerging Contaminants Removal

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Environmental Processes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Removing emerging contaminants from waste streams has become a topic of growing interest. The adverse effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) have been well documented, but much remains to be known about these contaminants and their removal. Their removal with traditional methods has not been entirely successful. However, adequate degradation can be achieved through the use of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs). Multiple factors must be considered when completing an in-depth comparison; therefore, process engineering, environmental, and economic and social parameters were included in a deeper analysis. This study presents a ranking system to numerically score the performance of various AOPs (e.g., Ozonation, UV irradiation, Photocatalysis, Fenton reaction, and integrated processes) in several categories of parameters under engineering, environmental, and socioeconomic components. From this preliminary assessment, it was noted that H2O2/O3 (Perozonation) presented the highest average ranking (3.45), with other processes showing comparable performance. TiO2 photocatalysis received the lowest ranking (2.11).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Agüera A, Bueno MJM, Fernández-Alba AR (2013) New trends in the analytical determination of emerging contaminants and their transformation products in environmental waters. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20(6):3496–3515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Kdasi A, Idris A, Saed K, Guan CT (2004) Treatment of textile wastewater by advanced oxidation processes—a review. Global Nest: the Int J 6(3):222–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreozzi R, Caprio V, Insola A, Marotta R (1999) Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) for water purification and recovery. Catal Today 53(1):51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azbar N, Yonar T, Kestioglu K (2004) Comparison of various advanced oxidation processes and chemical treatment methods for COD and color removal from a polyester and acetate fiber dyeing effluent. Chemosphere 55(1):35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baquero F, Martínez JL, Cantón R (2008) Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19(3):260–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belgiorno V, Rizzo L, Fatta D, Della Rocca C, Lofrano G, Nikolaou A, Meric S (2007) Review on endocrine disrupting-emerging compounds in urban wastewater: occurrence and removal by photocatalysis and ultrasonic irradiation for wastewater reuse. Desalination 215(1):166–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benotti MJ, Trenholm RA, Vanderford BJ, Holady JC, Stanford BD, Snyder SA (2008) Pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting compounds in US drinking water. Environ Sci Technol 43(3):597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonton A, Bouchard C, Barbeau B, Jedrzejak S (2012) Comparative life cycle assessment of water treatment plants. Desalination 284:42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong MN, Sharma AK, Burn S, Saint CP (2012) Feasibility study on the application of advanced oxidation technologies for decentralised wastewater treatment. J Clean Prod 35:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comninellis C, Kapalka A, Malato S, Parsons SA, Poulios I, Mantzavinos D (2008) Advanced oxidation processes for water treatment: advances and trends for R&D. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 83(6):769–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis ML (2010) Water and wastewater engineering: design principles and practice. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • del Mar Gómez-Ramos M, Pérez-Parada A, García-Reyes JF, Fernández-Alba AR, Agüera A (2011) Use of an accurate-mass database for the systematic identification of transformation products of organic contaminants in wastewater effluents. J Chromatogr A 1218(44):8002–8012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson RE, Nishioka M, Standley LJ, Perovich LJ, Brody JG, Rudel RA (2012) Endocrine disruptors and asthma-associated chemicals in consumer products. Environ Health Perspect 120(7):935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esplugas S, Gimenez J, Contreras S, Pascual E, Rodríguez M (2002) Comparison of different advanced oxidation processes for phenol degradation. Water Res 36(4):1034–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esplugas S, Bila DM, Krause LGT, Dezotti M (2007) Ozonation and advanced oxidation technologies to remove endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in water effluents. J Hazard Mater 149(3):631–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fick J, Lindberg RH, Tysklind M, Haemig PD, Waldenström J, Wallensten A, Olsen B (2007) Antiviral oseltamivir is not removed or degraded in normal sewage water treatment: implications for development of resistance by influenza A virus. PLoS One 2(10):986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez MJ, Sirtori C, Mezcua M, Fernández-Alba AR, Agüera A (2008) Photodegradation study of three dipyrone metabolites in various water systems: Identification and toxicity of their photodegradation products. Water Res 42(10):2698–2706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo C, Ge M, Liu L, Gao G, Feng Y, Wang Y (2009) Directed synthesis of mesoporous TiO2 microspheres: catalysts and their photocatalysis for bisphenol A degradation. Environ Sci Technol 44(1):419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haroune L, Salaun M, Ménard A, Legault CY, Bellenger JP (2014) Photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine and three derivatives using TiO2 and ZnO: effect of pH, ionic strength, and natural organic matter. Sci Total Environ 475:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber MM, Canonica S, Park GY, Von Gunten U (2003) Oxidation of pharmaceuticals during ozonation and advanced oxidation processes. Environ Sci Technol 37(5):1016–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James CP, Germain E, Judd S (2014) Micropollutant removal by advanced oxidation of microfiltered secondary effluent for water reuse. Sep Purif Technol 127:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim I, Tanaka H (2011) Energy consumption for PPCPs removal by O3 and O3/UV. Ozone Sci Eng 33(2):150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klausen MM, Grønborg O (2010) Pilot scale testing of advanced oxidation processes for degradation of geosmin and MIB in recirculated aquaculture. Water Sci Technol Water Supply 10(2):217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klavarioti M, Mantzavinos D, Kassinos D (2009) Removal of residual pharmaceuticals from aqueous systems by advanced oxidation processes. Environ Int 35(2):402–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler C, Venditti S, Igos E, Klepiszewski K, Benetto E, Cornelissen A (2012) Elimination of pharmaceutical residues in biologically pre-treated hospital wastewater using advanced UV irradiation technology: a comparative assessment. J Hazard Mater 239:70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linden KG, Sharpless CM, Andrews S, Atasi K, Korategere V, Stefan M, Suffet IM (2005) Innovative UV technologies to oxidize organic and organoleptic chemicals. Water Environment Research Foundation

  • Lloyd RV, Hanna PM, Mason RP (1997) The origin of the hydroxyl radical oxygen in the Fenton reaction. Free Radic Biol Med 22(5):885–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahamuni NN, Adewuyi YG (2010) Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) involving ultrasound for waste water treatment: a review with emphasis on cost estimation. Ultrason Sonochem 17(6):990–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrjouei M, Müller S, Möller D (2014) Energy consumption of three different advanced oxidation methods for water treatment: a cost-effectiveness study. J Clean Prod 65:178–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf & Eddy, (2014) Wastewater engineering: treatment and resource recovery, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mir NA, Khan A, Muneer M, Vijayalakhsmi S (2013) Photocatalytic degradation of a widely used insecticide Thiamethoxam in aqueous suspension of TiO2: adsorption, kinetics, product analysis and toxicity assessment. Sci Total Environ 458:388–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda-García N, Maldonado MI, Coronado JM, Malato S (2010) Degradation study of 15 emerging contaminants at low concentration by immobilized TiO2 in a pilot plant. Catal Today 151(1):107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Water Research Institute (NWRI) (2000) Treatment technologies for removal of methyl tertiary butyl ethyl (MTBE) from drinking water: air stripping, advanced oxidation processes, granular activated carbon, synthetic resin sorbets, 2nd edn. California MTBE Research Partnership, Fountain Valley

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea KE, Dionysiou DD (2012) Advanced oxidation processes for water treatment. J Phys Chem Lett 3(15):2112–2113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oller I, Malato S, Sánchez-Pérez J (2011) Combination of advanced oxidation processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination—a review. Sci Total Environ 409(20):4141–4166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poyatos JM, Muñio MM, Almecija MC, Torres JC, Hontoria E, Osorio F (2010) Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment: state of the art. Water Air Soil Pollut 205(1-4):187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MF, Yanful EK, Jasim SY (2009) Occurrences of endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment and their removal from drinking water: Challenges in the context of the developing world. Desalination 248(1):578–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds TD, Richards PA (1996) Unit operations and processes in environmental engineering, 2nd edn. Cengage Learning, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC), Curran MA (2006) Life-cycle assessment: principles and practice. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency

  • Shemer H, Kunukcu YK, Linden KG (2006) Degradation of the pharmaceutical metronidazole via UV, Fenton and photo-Fenton processes. Chemosphere 63(2):269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sichel C, Garcia C, Andre K (2011) Feasibility studies: UV/chlorine advanced oxidation treatment for the removal of emerging contaminants. Water Res 45(19):6371–6380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder SA, Westerhoff P, Yoon Y, Sedlak DL (2003) Pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and endocrine disruptors in water: implications for the water industry. Environ Eng Sci 20(5):449–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasinakis AS (2008) Use of selected advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for wastewater treatment—a mini review. Global NEST J 10(3):376–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff P, Yoon Y, Snyder S, Wert E (2005) Fate of endocrine-disruptor, pharmaceutical, and personal care product chemicals during simulated drinking water treatment processes. Environ Sci Technol 39(17):6649–6663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2003) Iron in drinking water. Retrieved March 12, 2015 from http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/iron.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE), the Bagley College of Engineering (BCoE), and the Office of Research and Economic Development (ORED) at Mississippi State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA

    Sara Ann Fast, Veera Gnaneswar Gude, Dennis D. Truax, James Martin & Benjamin S. Magbanua

Authors
  1. Sara Ann Fast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Veera Gnaneswar Gude
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dennis D. Truax
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Benjamin S. Magbanua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veera Gnaneswar Gude.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fast, S.A., Gude, V.G., Truax, D.D. et al. A Critical Evaluation of Advanced Oxidation Processes for Emerging Contaminants Removal. Environ. Process. 4, 283–302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-017-0207-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-017-0207-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation