Advertisement

Environmental Processes

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 895–908 | Cite as

Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk from Measured Background Ionizing Radiation Levels in Active Coal Mines Sites and Environs

  • E. O. AgbalagbaEmail author
  • J. C. Osimobi
  • G. O. Avwiri
Original Article
  • 296 Downloads

Abstract

A study of the terrestrial Background Ionizing Radiation (BIR) levels of Bunker and Okpara mining site environment in Enugu state has been carried out to estimate the excess lifetime cancer risk. A radiation monitoring meter (digilert 100) and a geographical positioning system (GPS) for GIS mapping were used. The monitoring of the BIR levels was carried out in one calendar year after delineating the environment of the two mining sites into four monitoring locations each. Average BIR levels measured ranged from 0.009 mRh−1 (0.76 mSvy−1) in Enugu new market (Bunker) mine site to 0.039 mRh−1 (2.52 mSvy−1) in Okpara mine site with overall mean value of 0.017 ± 0.007 mRh−1 (1.39 ± 0.60 mSvy−1). The computed average outdoor absorbed dose rate for the study area ranged from 113.10 ± 34.80 ηGyh−1 in Bunker mining area to 217.50 ± 78.30 ηGyh−1 in Okpara mining area, with a mean value of 143.55 ± 52.20 ηGyh−1. The mean annual effective dose equivalent (AEDE) calculated for the study coal mining sites was 0.18 ± 0.07 mSvy−1, while the mean excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) was (0.61 ± 0.14) ×10−3 mSvy−1. The dose received by organs was highest in the testes (0.12 mSvy−1), while the liver had the lowest dose values of 0.06 mSvy−1. The study revealed that of the 8 sampling locations and 3840 exposure measurements made, 74.1 % exceeded the world ambient standard levels of 0.013 mRh−1 (1.0 mSvy−1) recommended by UNSCEAR, and the recorded values were higher compared to values reviewed in literature. But the reported results may not constitute any immediate health risk to the residents and coal miners in the study area. The calculated Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk values indicates that the chance of developing cancer by residents and workers in the mine sites of the study area is low and the effective dose for adult organs investigated is insignificant to cause any health related sicknesses or damage to the investigated organs from the present exposure rate.

Keywords

BIR levels Excess lifetime cancer risk Coal mine Nigeria 

References

  1. Ademola JA, Onyema UC (2014) Assessment of natural radionuclides in fly ash produced at Orji River thermal Power Station, Nigeria and the associated radiological impact. Nat Sci 6:752–759. doi: 10.4236/ns.2014.610075
  2. Agbalagba EO, Avwiri GO (2012) Studies on the radiological impact of oil and gas activities in oil mineral lease 30 (OML3) oil fields in Delta State, Nigeria. J Pet Environ Biotechnol 3(2):1–8, www.omicsonline.org/2157-7463/pdfdownload.php?download Google Scholar
  3. Agbalagba EO, Meindinyo RK (2010) Radiological impact of oil spilled environment: a case study of the Eriemu Well 13 and 19 oil spillage in Ughelli region of Delta State, Nigeria. Indian J Sci Technol 2:1001–1005Google Scholar
  4. Agbalagba EO, Awviri GO, Chad-Umoren YE (2009) Occupational radiation profile of oil and gas facilities during production and off-production periods in Ughelli, Nigeria. Facta Univ, Ser: Work Living Environ Prot 6(1):11–19Google Scholar
  5. Akpabio LE, Etuk ES, Essian K (2005) Environmental radioactive levels in Ikot Ekpene Nigeria. Nig J Space Res 1:80–87Google Scholar
  6. Al Mugren KS (2015) Assessment of natural radioactivity levels and radiation dose rate in some soil samples from historical area, Al-Rakkah, Saudi Arabia. Nat Sci 7:238–247Google Scholar
  7. Amekudzie A, Emi-Reynolds G, Faanu A, Darko EO, Awudu AR, Adukpo O, Quaye LAN, Kpordzro R, Agyemang B, Ibrahim A (2011) Natural radioactivity concentration and dose assessment in shore sediments along the coast of Greater Accra, Ghana. World Appl Sci J 13(11):2338–2343Google Scholar
  8. Arongunjo AM, Farai IP, Fuwape IA (2004) Impact of oil and gas industrial to the natural radioactivity distribution in the delta region of Nigeria. Nig J Phys 16:131–136Google Scholar
  9. Avwiri GO, Agbalagba EO, Enyinna PI (2007) Terrestrial radiation around oil and gas facilities in Ughelli Nigeria. Asian network for science information. J Appl Sci 7(11):1543–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Avwiri GO, Egieya JF, Chinyere PO (2013) Radiometric survey of Aluu landfill, in Rivers State, Nigeria. Adv Phys Theories Appl 22:24–30Google Scholar
  11. Balogun FA, Mokobia CE, Fasasi MK, Ogundare FO (2003) Natural radioactivity associated with bituminous coal mining in Nigeria. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res A 505:444–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chikasssawa K, Ishil T, Sugiyama H (2001) Terrestrial gamma radiation in Kochi prefecture, Japan. J Health Sci 47(4):362–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clouvas A, Xianthos S, Antonopoulos-Domis M (2004) Radiological map of outdoor and indoor gamma dose rates in Greek urban areas obtained by in situ gamma spectrometry. Radiat Prot Dosim 112(2):267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diab HM, Nouh SA, Hamdy A, El-Fiki SA (2008) Evaluation of natural radioactivity in a cultivated area around a fertilizer factory. J Nucl Rad Phys 3(1):53–62Google Scholar
  15. Enugu State Ministry of Environment and Mineral Development (2010) Enugu state investment potentials in solid minerals. Government Bulletin, 23Google Scholar
  16. Erees FS, Akozcan S, Parlak Y, Cam S (2006) Assessment of dose rates around Manisa (Turkey). Radiat Meas 41(5):593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farai IP, Jibiri NN (2000) Baseline studies of terrestrial outdoor gamma dose rate levels in Nigeria. Radiat Prot Dosim 88:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foland CK, Kirland TK, Vinnikoov K (1995) Observed climate variations and changes (IPCC scientific assessment). Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 101–105Google Scholar
  19. ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) (1990) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) (1996) Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides. Part 5: Compilation of ingestion and inhalation coefficients . Pergamon Press, OxfordICR Publication 72Google Scholar
  21. Jibiri NN, Mbawanku AO, Oridate AA, Ujiagbedion C (1999) Natural radionuclide concentration levels in soil and water around cement factory, Ewekoro, Ogun state Nig. J Phys 11:12–16Google Scholar
  22. Kabir KA, Islam SAM, Rahman MM (2009) Distribution of radionuclides in surface soil and bottom sediment in the district of Jessore, Bangladesh and evaluation of radiation hazard. J Bangladesh Acad Sci 33(1):117–130Google Scholar
  23. Kant K, Rashmi R, Kuriakose S, Sonkawade RG, Chauhan RP, Chakarvairti SK, Sharma GS (2010) Radon activity and exhalation rate in Indian fly ash samples. Indian J Pure Appl Phys 48:457–462Google Scholar
  24. Mokobia CE (2011) Determination of the radiological health indices of using natural kaolin. Scientia Africana 10(1):29–33Google Scholar
  25. (NCRP) National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (1993) Limitation of exposure to ionizing radiation, NCRP report No. 116. March Nobel, B. J 1990. An introduction to radiation protection, Macmillan family Encyclopedia 2nd Ed. Pp 16–118Google Scholar
  26. Nwankwo LI, Akoshile CO (2005) Background radiation study of Offa industrial area of Kwara State, Nigeria. J Appl Sci Environ Mgt 9(3):95–98Google Scholar
  27. Osimobi JC, Agbalagba EO, Avwiri GO, Ononugbo CP (2015) GIS mapping and background ionizing radiation (BIR) assessment of solid mineral mining sites in Enugu State, Nigeria. Open Access Library Journal 2:e1979. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1101979 Google Scholar
  28. Rafique M (2013) Ambient indoor/outdoor gamma radiation dose rates in the city and at high altitudes of Muzaffarabad (Azad Kashmir). Environ Earth Sci 70(4):1783–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rafique M, Basharat M, Azhar Saeed R, Rahamn S (2013) Effects of geological and altitude on the ambient outdoor gamma dose rates in district Poonch, Azad Kashmir. Carpath J Earth Environ Sci 8(4):165–173Google Scholar
  30. Rafique M, Saeed UR, Muhammad B, Wajid A, Iftikhar A, Khursheed AL, Khalil AM (2014) Evaluation of excess life time cancer risk from gamma dose rates in Jhelum valley. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 7:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramli T, Aliyu AS, Agba EH, Saleh MA (2014) Effective dose from natural background radiation in Keffi and Akwanga towns, central Nigeria. Int J Radiat Res 12(1):234–239Google Scholar
  32. Sadiq AA, Agba EH (2011) Background radiation in Akwanga, Nigeria. Facta Univ, Ser: Work Living Environ Prot 8(1):7–11Google Scholar
  33. Senthilkumar B, Dhavamani V, Ramkuma S, Philominathan P (2010) Measurement of gamma radiation levels in soil samples from Thanjavur, using γ- ray spectrometry and estimation of population exposure. J Med Phys 35:48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taskin H, Karavus M, Ay P, Topuzoghi A, Hindiroglu S, Karaha G (2009) Radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to the gamma radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey. J Environ Radioact 100:49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. UNSCEAR. United Nationals, Sources and Effects of Atomic Radiation (1993) Report to the general Assembly with scientific Annexes, United Nations, New York, 1993Google Scholar
  36. UNSCEAR. United Nationals, Sources and Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the effect of atomic radiation, Report to the General Assemble, Annex B exposure from natural radiation sources. United Nations, New York, 2000Google Scholar
  37. WHO. World Health Organization (1993) Guideline for drinking water quality; measurement of natural and artificial radioactivity in powder milk corresponding to Annual Effective Dose Radiation Protection. Vol. 1 Recommendations Geneva, 1993Google Scholar
  38. Zaid Q, Ababneh Khled M, Aljarrah A, Ababneh M, Abdalmajeid MA (2010) Measurement of natural and artificial radioactivity in powder milk corresponding annual effective dose. Radiat Prot Dosim 138(3):278–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. O. Agbalagba
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. C. Osimobi
    • 1
  • G. O. Avwiri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of Port Harcourt ChobaPort HarcourtNigeria

Personalised recommendations