Understanding type and characteristics of mathematics apps can help primary school teachers to effectively assess and select apps to support learning. This study is an exploratory comparison of four different types of mathematics apps (practice-based, constructive, productive, game-based) based on the assessment of three characteristics (perceived learning value, usability, engagement) from the perspective of 20 grade 3 and 4 students over a five-week period. Pre- and post-test results indicated that students’ knowledge of basic addition and subtraction increased significantly after using mathematics apps. The results suggested that there were clear differences among the four apps examined. The game-based app was rated high on all three app characteristics. Productivity and constructive apps were rated relatively high on perceived learning and low on usability and engagement. The practice-based app ranked high on usability and engagement, but low on perceived learning. Future research needs to look at app type and characteristics in more depth and explore pedagogical choices when selecting and integrating mathematics apps in the classroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alon, S., An, H., & Fuentes, D. (2015). Teaching mathematics with Tablet PCs: A professional development program targeting primary school teachers. In Christou, G., Maromoustakos, S., Mavrou, K., Meletiou-Mavrothers, M. & Stylianou, G. (Eds.), Tablets in K-12 education: Integrated experiences and implications (pp. 175–197). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
An, H., Alon, S., & Fuentes, D. (2015). iPad implementation approaches in K-12 school environments. In Alon, S., An, H. & Fuentes, D. (Eds.), Tablets in K-12 education: Integrated experiences and implications (pp. 22–33). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., & Flanagan, S. (2016). Focus on inclusive education: Evaluating apps for students with disabilities: supporting academic access and success. Childhood Education, 92(2), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2016.1208014.
Bruner, J. S. (2009). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bulut, M. B., Unluturk, Hanife, & Kaya, G. (2015). The effects of Geogebra on third grade primary students’ academic achievement in fractions. Mathematics Education, 11(2), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.12973/iser.2016.2109a.
Burns, M. K., Kanive, R., & DeGrande, M. (2012). Effect of a computer-delivered math fact intervention as a supplemental intervention for math in third and fourth grades. Remedial and Special Education, 33(3), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510381652.
Cayton-Hodges, G. A., Feng, G., Pan, X. (2015). Tablet-based math assessment: What can we learn from math apps? Educational Technology & Society, 18 (2), 3–20. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/18_2/2.pdf
Chang, W.-L., Yuan, Y., Lee, C.-Y., Chen, M.-H., & Huang, W.-G. (2013). Using Magic Board as a teaching aid in third grader learning of area concepts. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 163–173.
Clark, W., & Luckin, R. (2013). IPads in the Classroom. London Knowledge Lab, 1, 1–31. Retrieved from http://www.thepdfportal.com/ipads-in-the-classroom-report-lkl_61713.pdf
Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De Leeuw, E. D. (2005). Surveying children. In S. J. Best & B. Radcliff (Eds.), Polling America: An encyclopedia of public opinion (pp. 831–835). Westport. CT: Greenwood Press.
Domingo, M. G., & Gargante, A. B. (2016). Exploring the use of educational technology in primary education: Teachers’ perception of mobile technology learning impacts and applications’ use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.023.
Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, W. (2000). How people learn: Brain. mind, experience and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Ebner, M. (2015). Mobile applications for math education—how should they be done? In Crompton, H., & Traxler, J. (Eds.). Mobile learning and mathematics. Foundations, design, and case studies (pp. 20.32), New York: Routledge.
Ellis, A. K., Bond, J. B., & Denton, D. W. (2012). An analytical literature review of the effects of metacognitive teaching strategies in primary and secondary student populations. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Development, 1(1), 9–23. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/cNxJfc
Falloon, G. (2013). Young students using iPads: App design and content influences on their learning pathways. Computers & Education, 68, 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.006.
Falloon, G. (2014). Researching young students’ learning pathways using iPads: What’s going on behind the screens? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(4), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12044.
Fraser Institute (2016). Fraser Institute: School Performance. Ontario: The Fraser Institute. Retrieved from http://www.fraserinstitute.org/school-performance
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
Freebody, P., Muspratt, S., & McRae, D. (2007). Evaluating the learning federation’s online curriculum content initiative, pp. 1–144. Retrieved from http://www.ndlrn.edu.au/verve/_resources/freebody_final_report_2007.pdf
Grandgenett, N., Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2011). An activity-based approach to technology integration in the mathematics classroom. NCSM Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 13(1), 19–28.
Handal, B., Campbell, C., Cavanagh, M., & Petocz, P. (2016). Characterising the perceived value of mathematics educational apps in preservice teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0160-0.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615569721.
Jerzembek, G., & Murphy, S. (2013). A narrative review of problem-based learning with school-aged children: implementation and outcomes. Educational Review, 65(2), 206–218. http://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2012.659655
Kay, R. H., & Knaack, L. (2008). Exploring the impact of learning objects in middle school mathematics and science classrooms: A formative analysis. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34(1). Retrieved from https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26430/19612
Keengwe, J. (2013). iPad integration in an elementary classroom. In Anderson, A. & Hur, J.W. (Eds.), Pedagogical applications and social effects of mobile technology integration (pp. 42–54). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Kiili, K., Ketamo, H., Koivisto, H., & Finn, E. (2014). Studying the user experience of a tablet based mathematics game. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 4(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.2014010104.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(2), 267–277.
Kong, S. C., & Kwok, L. F. (2005). A cognitive tool for teaching the addition/subtraction of common fractions: a model of affordances. Computers & Education, 45(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.002.
Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Milman, N., Carlson-Bancroft, A., & Boogart. (2014). Examining differentiation and utilization of iPads across content areas in an independent, pre K–4th grade elementary school. Computers in the Schools, 31(3), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2014.931776
Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Baker, J., Westenskow, A., Anderson-Pence, K. L., Shumway, J. F., & Jordan, K. E. (2013). A study comparing virtual manipulatives with other instructional treatments in third- and fourth-grade classrooms. Journal of Education, 193(2), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300204.
Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Salkind, G., & Bolyard, J. J. (2008). Virtual manipulatives used by K-8 teachers for mathematics instruction: Considering mathematical, cognitive, and pedagogical fidelity. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 202–218.
Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Suh, J. M. (2012). Learning mathematics with technology: The influence of virtual manipulatives on different achievement groups. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(1), 39–59.
Murray, O. T., & Olcese, N. R. (2011). Teaching and learning with iPads, ready or not? TechTrends, 55(6), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0540-6.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Nurmi, S., & Jaakkola, T. (2006). Effectiveness of learning objects in various instructional settings. Learning, Media and Technology, 33(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880600893283.
Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2017). Designing and creating an educational app rubric for preschool teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 3147–3165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9579-0.
Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives—Partnering for real learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Reimer, K. & Moyer, P. (2005). Third-graders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(1), 5–25. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/4NDRFE
Riconscente, M. M. (2013). Results from a controlled study of the iPad fractions game Motion Math. Games and Culture, 8(4), 186–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412013496894.
Schunk, D. H. (2008). Learning theories—An Educational perspective (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Statista. (2017). Compound annual growth rate of free and paid education app downloads worldwide from 2012 to 2017. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/273971/cagr-of-free-and-paid-education-app-downloads-worldwide/
Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 1–6. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
Suh, J. & Moyer, P. S. (2007). Developing students’ representational fluency using virtual and physical algebra balances. Journal of Computer in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(2), 155–173. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/cgxWDU
Technavio. (2015). Global Education Apps Market-Market Study 2015–2019. Retrieved from http://www.reportsnreports.com/reports/426935-global-education-apps-market-market-study-2015-2019.html
Thambi, N. & Eu, L. K. (2013). Effect of students’ achievement in fractions using GeoGebra. SAINSAB, 16, 97–106. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/HWRvpz
The Le@rning Foundation (2009). Using The Le@rning Federation digital curriculum resources to enhance the education of Indigenous students. Retrieved from http://www.ndlrn.edu.au/verve/_resources/indig_report_2009.pdf
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: The Autodesk Foundation. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/Sq7j5A
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watts, C. M., Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Tucker, S. I., Bullock, E. P., Shumway, J. F., & Westenskow, A. (2016). An examination of children’s learning progression shifts while using touch screen virtual manipulative mathematics apps. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 814–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.029.
Whitton, N. (2014). Digital games and learning: Research and theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
Zhang, M., Trussell, R. P., Gallegos, B., & Asam, R. R. (2015). Using mathematics apps for improving student learning: An exploratory study in an inclusive fourth grade classroom. Tech Trends, 59(2), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0837-y.
Appendix A: Attitude survey
Are you a: Boy or Girl (circle one)
What grade are you in? _____
What year were you born? ________
Please circle a number that tells how much you agree or disagree.
|Strongly disagree||Disagree||Neutral||Agree||Strongly agree|
|4. The app helped me to learn to add better||1||2||3||4||5|
|5. The app helped me to learn to subtract better||1||2||3||4||5|
|6. The app was easy to use||1||2||3||4||5|
|7. The app was fun to use||1||2||3||4||5|
What, if anything, did you like about using this app?
What, if anything, did you not like about using this app?
Appendix B: Interview
The interviewer placed the iPad in front of the student
Teacher: Hi (students’ name)! How are you? Please have a seat, (student’s name).
I would like to ask you a few questions about whether you liked using mathematics apps, and whether it helped you learn. It is important for teachers to find out the best apps to use in our mathematics class.
Which math apps were the most helpful? Show me on the iPad
Why did you choose these apps?
Were the uses of these apps in the math class helpful? Why or why not?
Did you have any problems or issues using these apps?
Appendix C: Sample test format
About this article
Cite this article
Kay, R., Kwak, J.Y. Comparing types of mathematics apps used in primary school classrooms: an exploratory analysis. J. Comput. Educ. 5, 349–371 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0109-x
- Mobile Learning