Skip to main content
Log in

Student perceptions on future components of electronic textbook design

  • Published:
Journal of Computers in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Electronic textbooks have been a subject of research for decades, yet student perceptions of interface components tend to be investigated in hindsight, and findings are not commonly taken into consideration for textbook design. This paper shifts the focus of electronic textbook design back toward students by identifying components that should be included in future electronic textbooks based on student perceptions in relation to the task of academic reading, as well as identifying associations with gender, experience level, academic level, and academic discipline. Findings from a university-wide online questionnaire that received more than 700 responses indicated that text, highlighting tools, bookmarks, multimedia, translation tools, dictionaries, and encyclopedias should all be incorporated in future electronic textbooks, as well as provided evidence to suggest that electronic textbooks should be tailored based on academic discipline. Understanding what students require for academic reading can facilitate the development of more suitable educational tools, and through the identification of suitable components, can enable the design of more standardized electronic textbooks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Abdullah, N., & Gibb, F. (2008). Students’ attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish higher education institute: Part 1. Library Review, 57(8), 593–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramson, L. (2012, January 19). Apple pushes interactive textbooks on iPads. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from

  • Arenas, E., Richards, T., & Barr, A. (2013, October). The IEEE actionable data book: A platform for inclusive education. In 2013 IEEE global humanitarian technology conference (GHTC) (pp. 63–67). IEEE.

  • Belfanti, P., & Gylling, M. (2014, February). What is EDUPUB. In EDUPUB 2 workshop Salt Lake City (pp. 12–13).

  • Brunet, D. P., Bates, M. L., Gallo, J. R., & Strother, E. A. (2011). Incoming dental students’ expectations and acceptance of an electronic textbook program. Journal of Dental Education, 75(5), 646–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. (2009). Technology: The textbook of the future. Nature, 458, 568–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. J., Corlett-Rivera, K., Hackman, T., & Zou, J. (2016). E-Book perceptions and use in STEM and non-STEM disciplines: A comparative follow-up study. Libraries and the Academy, 16(1), 131–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, T. W. (2010). How East Asian classrooms may change over the next 20 years. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 28–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, N. N., Walker, C., & Gleaves, A. (2015). An exploration of students’ lived experiences of using smartphones in diverse learning contexts using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. Computers & Education, 82, 96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, P. F., Lim, Y. P., & Ling, S. W. (2009). On the design preferences for ebooks. IETE Technical Review, 26(3), 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlan, S. (2012, March 26). Oxford launches free interactive course book. BBC: News Education. Retrieved from

  • Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & Education, 62, 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defazio, J. (2012). Challenges of electronic textbook authoring: Writing in the discipline. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 352, 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, A. R., McNamara, K. O., Morrone, A. S., & Plaskoff, J. (2015, January). Improving learning with etextbooks. In 2015 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) (pp. 5253–5259). IEEE.

  • Dominick, J. L. (2005). The in situ study of an electronic textbook in an educational setting. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

  • EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. (2012). ECAR national study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2012. Washington, DC: Educause.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H., & Mahadevan, V. (2013). Clinical anatomy: Applied anatomy for students and junior doctors. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, G., & Fairbairn, S. (2001). Reading at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, G. A. (2009, July 30). Lawsuit: Amazon ate my homework. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from

  • Gu, X., Wu, B., & Xu, X. (2015). Design, development, and learning in e-Textbooks: What we learned and where we are going. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. (1990). Textbook design: Current status and future directions. International Journal of Educational Research, 14(6), 533–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, T. (2013, September). Digital textbooks: Current status European and International formal standardisation & a proposed lifecycle model. Retrieved from

  • ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 (2013) ISO/IEC DTS 30135-1, Information technologyDigital publishingEPUB3Part 1: EPUB3 overview, Accessed June 15, 2017, from

  • Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation students: Agency and choice and the new technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 344–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jou, M., Tennyson, R. D., Wang, J., & Huang, S. Y. (2016). A study on the usability of E-books and APP in engineering courses: A case study on mechanical drawing. Computers & Education, 92, 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropman, M., Schoch, H. P., & Teoh, H. Y. (2004). An experience in e-learning: Using an electronic textbook. In Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE conference (pp. 512–515), Perth.

  • Landoni, M., Wilson, R., & Gibb, F. (2000). From the Visual Book to the WEB Book: The importance of design. The Electronic Library, 18(6), 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, T. H. (2015). The effects of keyword cues and 3R strategy on children’s e-book reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(2), 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacWilliam, A. (2013). The engaged reader. Publishing Research Quarterly, 29(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrel-Samuels, P. (2002). Getting the truth into workplace surveys. Harvard business review, 80(2), 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. R. (2008). E-books in higher education: Nearing the end of the era of hype? Educause Review, 43(2), 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Clark, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H. R., & Olle, C. (2008). UK scholarly e-book usage: A landmark survey. ASLIB Proceedings, 60(4), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, K., & Yang, Y. (1970). Modern control engineering. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • PolyU in Figures 2012/13. (2013, December 1). Retrieved March 13, 2014, from

  • Ray, N. M., & Tabor, S. W. (2003). Cyber surveys come of age. Marketing Research, 15(1), 32–37.

  • Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schcolnik, M. (2001). A study of reading with dedicated e-readers. Doctoral dissertation, Proquest Dissertations & Theses database (UMI No. 3028627).

  • Sheen, K. A., & Luximon, Y. (2015a). Relationship between academic discipline and user perception of the future of electronic textbooks. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 5845–5850.

  • Sheen, K. A., & Luximon, Y. (2015b). The future of electronic textbooks from a user perspective. In International conference on learning and collaboration technologies, August (pp. 704–713). Los Angeles, CA: Springer.

  • Simon, E. J. (2001). An experiment using electronic books in the classroom. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(1), 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, X., & Martin, B. (2013). Value chain adjustments in educational publishing. Publishing Research Quarterly, 29(1), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R., Landoni, M., & Gibb, F. (2003). The WEB Book experiments in electronic textbook design. Journal of Documentation, 59(4), 454–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(3), article 11.

  • Yi, M., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • zSpace. (2017). Virtual learning experience. Retrieved May 28, 2017, from

Download references


This work was supported by the Hong Kong Fellowship Scheme (1-904Z).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Luximon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheen, K.A., Luximon, Y. Student perceptions on future components of electronic textbook design. J. Comput. Educ. 4, 371–393 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: