Skip to main content

Student perceptions on future components of electronic textbook design


Electronic textbooks have been a subject of research for decades, yet student perceptions of interface components tend to be investigated in hindsight, and findings are not commonly taken into consideration for textbook design. This paper shifts the focus of electronic textbook design back toward students by identifying components that should be included in future electronic textbooks based on student perceptions in relation to the task of academic reading, as well as identifying associations with gender, experience level, academic level, and academic discipline. Findings from a university-wide online questionnaire that received more than 700 responses indicated that text, highlighting tools, bookmarks, multimedia, translation tools, dictionaries, and encyclopedias should all be incorporated in future electronic textbooks, as well as provided evidence to suggest that electronic textbooks should be tailored based on academic discipline. Understanding what students require for academic reading can facilitate the development of more suitable educational tools, and through the identification of suitable components, can enable the design of more standardized electronic textbooks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6


  1. Abdullah, N., & Gibb, F. (2008). Students’ attitudes towards e-books in a Scottish higher education institute: Part 1. Library Review, 57(8), 593–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abramson, L. (2012, January 19). Apple pushes interactive textbooks on iPads. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from

  3. Arenas, E., Richards, T., & Barr, A. (2013, October). The IEEE actionable data book: A platform for inclusive education. In 2013 IEEE global humanitarian technology conference (GHTC) (pp. 63–67). IEEE.

  4. Belfanti, P., & Gylling, M. (2014, February). What is EDUPUB. In EDUPUB 2 workshop Salt Lake City (pp. 12–13).

  5. Brunet, D. P., Bates, M. L., Gallo, J. R., & Strother, E. A. (2011). Incoming dental students’ expectations and acceptance of an electronic textbook program. Journal of Dental Education, 75(5), 646–652.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Butler, D. (2009). Technology: The textbook of the future. Nature, 458, 568–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carroll, A. J., Corlett-Rivera, K., Hackman, T., & Zou, J. (2016). E-Book perceptions and use in STEM and non-STEM disciplines: A comparative follow-up study. Libraries and the Academy, 16(1), 131–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan, T. W. (2010). How East Asian classrooms may change over the next 20 years. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 28–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan, N. N., Walker, C., & Gleaves, A. (2015). An exploration of students’ lived experiences of using smartphones in diverse learning contexts using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. Computers & Education, 82, 96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chong, P. F., Lim, Y. P., & Ling, S. W. (2009). On the design preferences for ebooks. IETE Technical Review, 26(3), 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coughlan, S. (2012, March 26). Oxford launches free interactive course book. BBC: News Education. Retrieved from

  12. Daniel, D. B., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & Education, 62, 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Defazio, J. (2012). Challenges of electronic textbook authoring: Writing in the discipline. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 352, 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dennis, A. R., McNamara, K. O., Morrone, A. S., & Plaskoff, J. (2015, January). Improving learning with etextbooks. In 2015 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS) (pp. 5253–5259). IEEE.

  15. Dominick, J. L. (2005). The in situ study of an electronic textbook in an educational setting. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

  16. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. (2012). ECAR national study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2012. Washington, DC: Educause.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ellis, H., & Mahadevan, V. (2013). Clinical anatomy: Applied anatomy for students and junior doctors. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fairbairn, G., & Fairbairn, S. (2001). Reading at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fowler, G. A. (2009, July 30). Lawsuit: Amazon ate my homework. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from

  20. Gu, X., Wu, B., & Xu, X. (2015). Design, development, and learning in e-Textbooks: What we learned and where we are going. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hartley, J. (1990). Textbook design: Current status and future directions. International Journal of Educational Research, 14(6), 533–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoel, T. (2013, September). Digital textbooks: Current status European and International formal standardisation & a proposed lifecycle model. Retrieved from

  23. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34 (2013) ISO/IEC DTS 30135-1, Information technologyDigital publishingEPUB3Part 1: EPUB3 overview, Accessed June 15, 2017, from

  24. Jones, C., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation students: Agency and choice and the new technologies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 344–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jou, M., Tennyson, R. D., Wang, J., & Huang, S. Y. (2016). A study on the usability of E-books and APP in engineering courses: A case study on mechanical drawing. Computers & Education, 92, 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kropman, M., Schoch, H. P., & Teoh, H. Y. (2004). An experience in e-learning: Using an electronic textbook. In Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE conference (pp. 512–515), Perth.

  27. Landoni, M., Wilson, R., & Gibb, F. (2000). From the Visual Book to the WEB Book: The importance of design. The Electronic Library, 18(6), 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liang, T. H. (2015). The effects of keyword cues and 3R strategy on children’s e-book reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(2), 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. MacWilliam, A. (2013). The engaged reader. Publishing Research Quarterly, 29(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Morrel-Samuels, P. (2002). Getting the truth into workplace surveys. Harvard business review, 80(2), 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nelson, M. R. (2008). E-books in higher education: Nearing the end of the era of hype? Educause Review, 43(2), 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Clark, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H. R., & Olle, C. (2008). UK scholarly e-book usage: A landmark survey. ASLIB Proceedings, 60(4), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ogata, K., & Yang, Y. (1970). Modern control engineering. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  34. PolyU in Figures 2012/13. (2013, December 1). Retrieved March 13, 2014, from

  35. Ray, N. M., & Tabor, S. W. (2003). Cyber surveys come of age. Marketing Research, 15(1), 32–37.

  36. Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schcolnik, M. (2001). A study of reading with dedicated e-readers. Doctoral dissertation, Proquest Dissertations & Theses database (UMI No. 3028627).

  38. Sheen, K. A., & Luximon, Y. (2015a). Relationship between academic discipline and user perception of the future of electronic textbooks. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 5845–5850.

  39. Sheen, K. A., & Luximon, Y. (2015b). The future of electronic textbooks from a user perspective. In International conference on learning and collaboration technologies, August (pp. 704–713). Los Angeles, CA: Springer.

  40. Simon, E. J. (2001). An experiment using electronic books in the classroom. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(1), 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tian, X., & Martin, B. (2013). Value chain adjustments in educational publishing. Publishing Research Quarterly, 29(1), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wilson, R., Landoni, M., & Gibb, F. (2003). The WEB Book experiments in electronic textbook design. Journal of Documentation, 59(4), 454–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(3), article 11.

  45. Yi, M., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. zSpace. (2017). Virtual learning experience. Retrieved May 28, 2017, from

Download references


This work was supported by the Hong Kong Fellowship Scheme (1-904Z).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Luximon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheen, K.A., Luximon, Y. Student perceptions on future components of electronic textbook design. J. Comput. Educ. 4, 371–393 (2017).

Download citation


  • Electronic textbooks
  • Future design
  • Interface design
  • User experience
  • Human–computer interaction
  • Interface components