Abstract
The study employs an exploratory approach to examine the satisfaction of normal and dyslexic learners toward different web text modes. As an average of 10 % of the population shows some traits of dyslexia, presenting web text solely based on the guidelines for normal web users will put users with dyslexia at disadvantage. Due to the ubiquitous use of the web for online learning purposes and the availability of tremendous amount of text on the web, this investigation intends to derive appropriate guidelines for presenting web text that could accommodate both groups of learners. This qualitative study uses a multiple case study design and data are mainly collected via observations and guided interviews. The study reveals that existing dyslexia-friendly text guidelines are also appropriate for normal learners and the use of screen reader, an assistive technology that reads text aloud, does not fit every dyslexic and normal learner.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based courses: An exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs. Management Learning, 33(3), 331–347.
British Dyslexia Association. (n.d.a). Dyslexia and specific difficulties: Overview, Retrieved Oct 7 2015 from http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/dyslexic/dyslexia-and-specific-difficulties-overview
British Dyslexia Association. (n.d.b). Dyslexia style guide, Retrieved July 15 2014 from http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/about-dyslexia/further-information/dyslexia-style-guide.html
Buzzi, M. C., Buzzi, M., & Leporini, B. (2009). Accessing e-learning systems via screen reader: an example. In Human–Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains (pp. 21–30). Berlin: Springer.
Chandrashekar, S. (2010). Is hearing believing? Perception of online information credibility by screen reader users who are blind or visually impaired (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto).
Elkind, J., Cohen, K., & Murray, C. (1993). Using computer-based readers to improve reading comprehension of students with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 43(1), 238–259.
Evett, L., & Brown, D. (2005). Text formats and web design for visually impaired and dyslexic readers—clear text for all. Interacting with Computers, 17(4), 453–472.
Freire, A. P., Petrie, H., & Power, C. (2011). Empirical results from an evaluation of the accessibility of websites by dyslexic users. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Accessible Design in the Digital World. Lisboa, Portugal: CEUR-WS. org (pp. 41–53).
Gardner, C., & Amoroso, D. L. (2004). Development of an instrument to measure the acceptance of internet technology by consumers. In System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on IEEE.
Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Education research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. New Jersey: Prentice hall.
Geske, J., & Bellur, S. (2008). Differences in brain information processing between print and computer screens: Bottom-up and top-down attention factors. International Journal of Advertising, 27, 399–423.
Grabinger, R. S., & Amedeo, D. (1988). CRT text layout: Perceptions of viewers. Computers in Human Behavior, 4(3), 189–205.
GreatSchools (2008). Assistive technology: A parent’s guide http://www.disabilityrightsca.org/pubs/Assistive_Technology_Parents_Guide.pdf
Gregor, P., Dickinson, A., Macaffer, A., & Andreasen, P. (2003). Seeword—a personal word processing environment for dyslexic computer users. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 341–355.
Hersh, M. (2014). Evaluating ICT based learning technologies for disabled people. In K. Miesenberger, J. Klaus, W. Zagler & A. Karshmer (Eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs (pp. 315–322). Springer International Publishing.
International Organization for Standardization. (2008). Ergonomics of human-system interaction. Part 151: Guidance on World Wide Web user interfaces. International standard ISO 9241-151. Switzerland.
Isik, O. (2008). E-learning satisfaction factors. In Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the decision sciences institute, Baltimore (pp. 941–946).
Kiraly, J., & Ridge, P. M. (2001). U.S. Patent No. 6,324,511. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Kolers, P. A., Duchnicky, R. L., & Ferguson, D. C. (1981). Eye movement measurement of readability of CRT displays. Human Factors, 23(5), 517–527.
Lazar, J., Allen, A., Kleinman, J., & Malarkey, C. (2007). What frustrates screen reader users on the web: A study of 100 blind users. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 22(3), 247–269.
Lee, Y. J. (2008). A study of the influence of instructional innovation on learning satisfaction and study achievement. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 4(2), 43–54.
Leporini, B., & Paternò, F. (2004). Increasing usability when interacting through screen readers. Universal Access in the Information Society, 3(1), 57–70.
Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.
Lynch, P. J., & Horton, S. (2008). Web style guide: Basic design principles for creating web sites. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). Defining dyslexia, comorbidity, teachers’ knowledge of language and reading a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 1–14.
McCarthy, J. E., & Swierenga, S. J. (2010). What we know about dyslexia and Web accessibility: A research review. Universal Access in the Information Society, 9, 147–152.
Nielsen, J. (2003). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Retrieved Aug 11 2014 from didattica.uniroma2.it
Raskind, M. H., & Higgins, E. L. (1998). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities an overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(1), 27–40.
Rello, L., Kanvinde, G., & Baeza-Yates, R. (2012). Layout guidelines for web text and a web service to improve accessibility for dyslexics. In Proceedings of the international cross-disciplinary conference on web accessibility (p. 36). ACM.
Schoeberlein, J. G., & Wang, Y. K. (2009). Groupware accessibility for persons with disabilities. In S. Constantine (Ed.), Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction. Applications and Services (pp. 404–413). Berlin: Springer.
Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2012). Dyslexia and Reading Disorders. Psychopathology of Childhood and Adolescence: A Neuropsychological Approach, p 127
Smythe, I. (2011). Dyslexia. British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 72(1), 39.
Stenneken, P., Egetemeir, J., Schulte-Körne, G., Müller, H. J., Schneider, W. X., & Finke, K. (2011). Slow perceptual processing at the core of developmental dyslexia: A parameter-based assessment of visual attention. Neuropsychologia, 49(12), 3454–3465.
Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.
Tough, A. M. (1982). Intentional changes: A fresh approach to helping people change. New York: Cambridge Book Co.
Tunmer, W., & Greaney, K. (2010). Defining dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(3), 229–243.
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2–40.
Wies, E. F., O’Modhrain, M. S., Hasser, C. J., Gardner, J. A., & Bulatov, V. L. (2001). Web-based touch display for accessible science education. In Haptic human–computer interaction (pp. 52-60). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
World Wide Web Consortium. (2008). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Retrieved October 23, 2014 from http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag
Wu, J. P., Tsai, R. J., Chen, C. C., & Wu, Y. C. (2006). An integrative model to predict the continuance use of electronic learning systems: Hints for teaching. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(2), 287–302.
Zarach, V. (2002). Ten guidelines for improving accessibility for people with dyslexia. CETIS University of Wales Bangor. Retrieved July 15, 2014 from http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/Ten_Guidelines_for_Improving_Accessibility_for_People_with_Dyslexia
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the financial support rendered by Universiti Malaysia Sarawak through Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, Ministry of Education, Malaysia, grant no. FRGS/06(20)/847/2012(87).
Funding
We, the authors whose names are listed above certify that we have NO affiliation with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter discussed in this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, C.J., Keong, M.W.Y., Teh, C.S. et al. Web text reading: what satisfy both dyslexic and normal learners?. J. Comput. Educ. 3, 47–58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0046-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0046-x