Abstract
As editors for this special journal, Graves and Woods have compiled a discussion of the accuracy of the labels for Black children. It is exciting that they have brought together a team of scholars to tackle the very specific question posed by Hilliard (1991) and Guthrie (1976/2002) about the validity of IQ testing in regards to accurately and predictively focusing on high quality assessments for Black youth. As practitioner[1]scholars who have trained and practiced for nearly 50 combined years in California, we appreciate the opportunity to share our perspective regarding the important topic of this special issue. In America, 49 other states and its territories do not have a ban on tests that can be used with students. However, in California, since the 1970’s, due to the Larry P v. Riles court case and resultant directives from the Special Education Department within the California Department of Education (CDE), there has been a ban on using Intellectual Quotient (IQ) tests for use in special education placement for Black students in any of the 13 handicapping conditions, which is an expansion of the findings for Larry P. v. Riles , 495 F. Supp. 926 (California 1979) which dealt exclusively with Intellectual Disability and whose expansion was ruled against in Crawford v. Honig 37 F .3d 485 (9 th Cir. 1994). For this commentary, the authors answer the following questions. What would happen if the ban was lifted in California? How does California special education eligibility, with its injunction not to use cognitive ability/intelligence tests for Black students, compare to the rest of the nation that does not have such an injunction? Should school psychologists use IQ tests or not and is that the best question to ask? The authors conclude with recommendations for practitioners and scholars.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychological Association, Task Force on Resilience and Strength in Black Children and Adolescents. (2008). Resilience in African American children and adolescents: A vision for optimal development. Author Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/cyf/resilience.html.
California Department of Education (n.d.). Data and Statistics. As retrieved from https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/
Cordington, J. & Fairchild, H. (2012). Special education and the mis-education of the African American children: A call to action. A position paper of the Association of Black Psychologists. Ft. Washington, MD: Author. As retrieved from https://www.abpsi.org/pdf/specialedpositionpaper021312.pdf
Gamble, B. (2013). Larry P moved down the hall: from educably mentally retarded to emotionally disturbed the over-representation of African American students in special education. CASP Today: A publication of the California Association of School Psychologists., 62(3), 10–11.
Graves, S. L., & Blake, J. J. (Eds.). (2016). Applying psychology in the schools book series. Psychoeducational assessment and intervention for ethnic minority children: Evidence-based approaches. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14855-000.
Guthrie, R. (1976/2002). Even the Rat Was White: A Historical View of Psychology (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Harper, S. R. (2012). Black male student success in higher education: A report from the national Black male college achievement study. University of Pennsylvania, Center for the Study of Race and Equity in Education. As Retrieved from https://web-app.usc.edu/web/rossier/publications/231/Harper%20(2012)%20Black%20Male%20Success.pdf.
Hilliard, A. (1991). Testing African American students: Special re-issue of the Negro Educational Review (Editor). Third World Press.
Hilliard, A. (2003). No mystery: Closing the achievement gap between Africans and excellence. In Young, gifted, and Black: Promoting high achievement among African-American Students (pp. 131–166). Beacon Press.
Hiramoto, J. (2013). Best practice guidelines for the assessment of African American students’ cognitive processes. Northern California Diagnostic Center. As Retrieved from http://www.dcn-cde.ca.gov/documents/crt-2013.pdf.
Hiramoto, J., & Gamble, B. (2018). Regarding African American student achievement and success: A position paper. California Association of School Psychologists. As Retrieved from https://casponline.org/event-handouts/fall19/SS-02-2.pdf.
Kaufman, S. B., Reynolds, M. R., Liu, X., Kaufman, A. S., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). Are cognitive g and academic achievement g one and the same g? An exploration on the Woodcock-Johnson and Kaufman tests. Intelligence, 40(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.01.009.
Naglieri, J. A., & Bornstein, B. T. (2003). Intelligence and achievement: Just how correlated are they? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21(3), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290302100302.
National Association of School Psychologists (2011). NASP Position Statement: Racial and ethnic disproportionality in education. As retrieved 02/21/20 from https://www.nasponline.org/x26829.xml
Sandoval, L. (1997). Memorandum – Clarification on the use of standardized intelligence tess with African-American students for special education eligibility assessment.
Stevenson, H. (2003). Commentary: The conspicuous invisibility of Black ways of being: Missing data in new models of children’s mental health. School Psychology Review, 32(4), 520–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2003.12086216.
Sullivan, A., & Proctor, S. (2016). The shield or the sword? Revising the debate on racial disproportionality in special education and implications for school psychologists. School Psychology Forum, 10(3), 278–288 As retrieved from https://www.nasponline.org/.
United States Depart of Education’s Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services (2016). Racial and ethnic disparities in special education: A multi-year disproportionality analysis by state, analysis category, and race/ethnicity. As retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/programs/osepidea/618-data/LEA-racial-ethnic-disparities-tables/disproportionality-analysis-by-state-analysis-category.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors contributed to the commentary conception, lit review, research, and information in the manuscript. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by the second author, and the lit review by the first author. The first draft of the manuscript was written by the authors who also commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Consideration and Informed Consent
Ethical consideration for data reviewed in the commentary was taken regarding the data being available in the public domain (i.e., State or Federal webpages). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest other than unpaid positions on the board for the California Association of School Psychologists as well as the Association of Black Psychologists.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gamble, B., Hiramoto, J. Commentary of the Special Issue Regarding Black Children: a California School Psychology Perspective. Contemp School Psychol 25, 213–218 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00382-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00382-5