Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Exploratory Investigation of Threat Assessment Practices in Colorado Schools

  • Published:
Contemporary School Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple professional associations and agencies have recommended that schools establish threat assessment processes and procedures. Such recommendations have been directed at school districts in Colorado, a state that has experienced multiple school shootings. In this exploratory study, the nature and prevalence of threat assessment conducted in four Colorado school districts, as well as the demographics of students, were examined. The sample consisted of 759 threat assessment cases reported by the four participating Colorado school districts for the 2014–2015 academic year. Students were in grades pre-K to Grade 12. The majority of the threat cases were male (81.70%) and 39.9% received special education services. Just over 42% of the sample was white, 16.9% Hispanic, 16.1% African American, 5.3% Asian, and 4.2% Native American. Raw threat assessment data was provided by safety coordinators in each of the school districts. Data included student demographics and threat characteristics, though the availability of these data varied by district. Analyses revealed that males, students in special education, and African American and Native American students were overrepresented in the threat assessment sample. Logistic regression indicated that students in special education were significantly more likely to have a threat rated as serious than those not in special education. Study findings have implications for school assessment practices and training in public schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Netherlands)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aber, J. L., Brown, J. L., & Jones, S. M. (2003). Developmental trajectories toward violence in middle childhood: Course, demographic differences, and response to school-based intervention. Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.2.324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K., Cornell, D., Lorek, E., & Sheras, P. (2008). Response of school personnel to student threat assessment training. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802332184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, C. (2015). Understanding relative risk, odds ratios, and related terms: as simple as it can get. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 76(7), e857–e861. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.15f10150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borum, R., Cornell, D., Modzeleski, W., & Jimerson, S. R. (2010). What can be done about school shootings? A review of the evidence. Educational Researcher, 39, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, M., Kriger, N., & Miró, R. (2018). School safety policies and programs administered by the US federal government: 1990–2016. https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=273697

  • Burnette, A. G., Datta, P., & Cornell, D. (2017). The distinction between transient and substantive student threats. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 5(a), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colorado School Safety Resource Center. (2009). Essentials of School Threat Assessment: Preventing Targeted School Violence. http://cdpsdocs.state.co.us/safeschools/CSSRC%20Documents/CSSRC-Essentials-of-TA.pdf

  • Colorado School Safety Resource Center. (2016). Review of the three Arapahoe High School Shooting 2013 reports facilitated by the Colorado School Safety Resource Center, September 2016. http://cdpsdocs.state.co.us/safeschools/CSSRC%20Documents/CSSRC-RWG-Report-FINAL.pdf

  • Colorado School Safety Resource Center. (2018). Essentials of School Threat Assessment: Preventing Targeted School Violence. http://cdpsdocs.state.co.us/safeschools/CSSRC%20Documents/CSSRC-Essentials-of-TA.pdf

  • Cornell, D. G. (2011). A developmental perspective on the Virginia student threat assessment guidelines. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2011(129), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D. (2014). Best practices in threat assessment in schools. In A. Thomas & P. Harrison (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology (6th ed., pp. 259–272) National Association of School Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D. (2015). Our schools are safe: Challenging the misperception that schools are dangerous places. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85(3), 217–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D., & Sheras, P. (2006). Guidelines for responding to student threats of violence. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D. G., Sheras, P. L., Kaplan, S., McConville, D., Douglass, J., Elkon, A., McKnight, L., Branson, C., & Cole, J. (2004). Guidelines for student threat assessment: field-test findings. School Psychology Review, 33(4), 527–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D., Sheras, P., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2009). A retrospective study of school safety conditions in high schools using the Virginia threat assessment guidelines versus alternative approaches. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2011). Reductions in long-term suspensions following adoption of the Virginia student threat assessment guidelines. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 95, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636511415255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D., Allen, K., & Fan, X. (2012). A randomized controlled study of the Virginia student threat assessment guidelines in grades K-12. School Psychology Review, 41, 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/e669802012-500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D., Maeng, J. L., Burnette, A. G., Jia, Y., Huang, F., Konold, T., Datta, P., Malone, M., & Meyer, P. (2018a). Student threat assessment as a standard school safety practice: Results from a statewide implementation study. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D., Maeng, J., Huang, F., Shukla, K., & Konold, T. (2018b). Racial/ethnic parity in disciplinary consequences using student threat assessment. School Psychology Review, 47(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0030.V47-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diliberti, M., Jackson, M., Correa, S., and Padgett, Z. (2019). Crime, Violence, Discipline, and Safety in U.S. Public Schools: Findings From the School Survey on Crime and Safety: 2017–18 (NCES 2019-061). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for education statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.

  • Farrell, A. D., Sullivan, T. N., Esposito, L. E., Meyer, A. L., & Valois, R. F. (2005). A latent growth curve analysis of the structure of aggression, drug use, and delinquent behaviors and their interrelations over time in urban and rural adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00091.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, R. A., Vossekuil, B., Pollack, W. S., Borum, R., Modzeleski, W., & Reddy, M. (2004). Threat assessment in schools: A guide to managing threatening situations and to creating safe school climates. https://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/safety/threatassessmentguide.pdf

  • Goodrum, S., Evans, M. K., Thompson, A. J., & Woodward, W. (2019). Learning from a failure in threat assessment: 11 questions and not enough answers. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 37, 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., Huang, F. L., Anyon, Y., Greer, E., & Downing, B. (2018). An examination of restorative interventions and racial equity in out-of-school suspensions. School Psychology Review, 47(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0073.V47-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, K. M., Hall, J. E., Wang, J., Gaylor, E. M., Johnson, L. L., Shelby, D., et al. (2019). Characteristics of school-associated youth homicides—United States, 1994–2018. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(3), 53–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson, S. R., Brock, S. E., & Cowan, K. C. (2005). Threat assessment: an essential component of a comprehensive safe school program. Principal Leadership, 6(2), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Queen, B., et al. (2018). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2017. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 67(8), 1–479. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. G., & Cornell, D. G. (2005). Threats of violence by students in special education. Behavioral Disorders, 31(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290503100102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeng, J. L., Cornell, D., & Huang, F. (2020). Student threat assessment as an alternative to exclusionary discipline. Journal of School Violence, 19(3), 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meloy, J. R., Hempel, A., Mohandie, K., Shiva, A., Gray, T., & Richards, T. (2004). A comparative analysis of north American adolescent and adult mass murderers. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 22, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M., & Palk, G. (2016). Traversing the space between threats and violence: a review of threat assessment guidelines. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(6), 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1164638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2013). IBM SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (5th ed.). Taylor and Francis.

  • Musu-Gillette, L., Zhang, A., Wang, K., Zhang, J., and Oudekerk, B.A. (2017). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2016 (NCES 2017-064/NCJ 250650). National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC.

  • National Association of School Psychologists School Safety and Crisis Response Committee. (2010). Model for comprehensive and integrated school psychological services. National Association of School Psychologists. https://www.nasponline.org/standards-and-certification/nasp-practice-model

  • National Association of School Psychologists School Safety and Crisis Response Committee. (2015). Threat assessment for school administrators and crisis teams. National Association of School Psychologists. https://www.nasponline.org/resourcesand-publications/resources/school-safety-and-crisis/threat-assessmentat-school/threat-assessment-for-school-administrators-and-crisis-teams.

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). Percentage of students suspended and expelled from public elementary and secondary schools, by sex, race/ethnicity, and state: 2013–14. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d18/tables/dt18_233.28.asp?current=yes

  • National Threat Assessment Center. (2018). Enhancing school safety using a threat assessment model: An operational guide for preventing targeted school violence. Department of Homeland Security: U.S. Secret Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Threat Assessment Center. (2019). Protecting America’s schools: A U.S, Secret service analysis of targeted school violence. Department of Homeland Security: U.S. Secret Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nekvasil, E. K., & Cornell, D. G. (2012). Student reports of peer threats of violence: Prevalence and outcomes. Journal of School Violence, 11(4), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2012.706764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nekvasil, E., & Cornell, D. (2015). Student threat assessment associated with positive school climate in middle schools. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2, 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, M. D., Wolf-Prusan, L., Lima Rodriguez, C., Xiong, R., & Swarts, M. R. (2019). Cultural-competence considerations for contemporary school-based threat assessment. Psychology in the Schools, 56(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, M. E. (2000). The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective. National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime: Critical Incident Response Group, FBI Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. A., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). Risk and protective factors associated with the bullying involvement of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 37(3), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291203700302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). Social anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. American Journal of Public Health, 95(2), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.037705.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation. (2017). Safety assessment and intervention. http://www.sandyhookpromise.org/prevention_Programs

  • Sawchuk, S. (2019). What are threat assessments and how do schools use them? Education Week,39 (3), 7.

  • Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C. G., Rausch, M. K., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40, 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, K., & Cornell, D. (2008). Student threat assessment in Memphis City schools: A descriptive report. Behavioral Disorders, 34(1), 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swearer, S. M., Wang, C., Maag, J. W., Siebecker, A. B., & Frerichs, L. J. (2012). Understanding the bullying dynamic among students in special and general education. Journal of School Psychology, 50(4), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.04.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Office for Civil Rights. (2014). School discipline. Author.

  • Van Dyke, R. B., & Schroeder, J. L. (2006). Implementation of the Dallas threat of violence risk assessment. In S. R. Jimerson & M. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice (pp. 603–616). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  • Vossekuil, B., Fein, R. A., Reddy, M., Borum, R., & Modzeleski, W. (2004). The final report and findings of the safe school initiative: Implications for the prevention of school attacks in the United States. United States Secret Service and United States Department of Education.

  • Woitaszewski, S., Crepeau-Hobson, F., Conolly, C., & Cruz, M. (2018). Rules, requirements, and resources for school-based threat assessment: A fifty state analysis. Contemporary School Psychology, 22(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0161-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franci Crepeau-Hobson.

Ethics declarations

This study was not supported by any funding and the authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

This study was approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board in 2018.

Existing, deidentified data were used in this study and informed consent was not required.

Due to agreements with participating school districts, the data used in this study cannot be made available to other researchers.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crepeau-Hobson, F., Leech, N. An Exploratory Investigation of Threat Assessment Practices in Colorado Schools. Contemp School Psychol 26, 458–468 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00356-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00356-7

Keywords

Navigation