Skip to main content

Case Conceptualization as an Alternative to Educationally Related Mental Health Assessments

Abstract

School psychologists play an essential role in the provision of school-based mental health services yet continue to spend the majority of their time conducting psychoeducational assessments. In California, changes in law regarding the provision of mental health services have increased the tension around the role of school psychologists and led to models for determining the need for mental health services that are inefficient and present a potential barrier to students receiving services in a timely manner. The paper proposes case conceptualization as a more useful and efficient approach, than traditional assessment processes for determining students’ mental needs and writing goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael R. Hass.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This research leading to this paper did not involve gathering data from humans or animals; thus, no informed consent was required.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hass, M.R., Maupin, Z. & Doria, M. Case Conceptualization as an Alternative to Educationally Related Mental Health Assessments. Contemp School Psychol 26, 290–298 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00349-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00349-y

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Mental health
  • Case conceptualization