Skip to main content
Log in

Solution Team: Outcomes of a Target-Centered Approach to Resolving School Bullying

  • Published:
Contemporary School Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because school bullying causes short-term and long-term suffering for both victims and perpetrators, many schools want more effective interventions. Traditional, punitive approaches have been shown to exacerbate the problem, but one organization (No Bully) has developed a system that is peer-driven, empathy-building, and target-centered. This article considers one part of this system, known as Solution Team, wherein a teacher or staff member leads the student accused of bullying, bystanders, and pro-social peers through a series of solution-focused meetings. Analysis of data from 284 Solution Teams shows reduced intensity and frequency of bullying in 86.8% and 87.6% of cases, respectively. Perceived school safety significantly improved for targets after the intervention (p < .0001), and in 87% of cases, the adult facilitator reported a successful process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, E. (2005). Pastoral care to regulate school bullying: shame management among bystanders. Pastoral Care in Education, 23(2), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0264-3944.2005.00328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, E., & Braithwaite, V. (2004). What, me ashamed? Shame management and school bullying. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 269–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427804266547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, E., & Braithwaite, J. (2005). Forgiveness, shaming, shame and bullying. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 38, 298–323. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.38.3.298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task, F. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools?: an evidentiary review and recommendations. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 63(9), 852–862. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amstutz, L. S., & Mullet, J. H. (2005). The little book of restorative discipline for schools: Teaching responsibility, creating caring climates. Intercourse: Good Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beran, T., Hughes, G., & Lupart, J. (2008). A model of achievement and bullying: analyses of the Canadian National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth data. Educational Research, 50, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573509357046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthold, K. A., & Hoover, J. H. (2000). Correlates of bullying and victimization among intermediate students in the Midwestern USA. School Psychology International, 21, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034300211005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkett, M., Espelage, D. L., & Koenig, B. (2009). LGB and questioning students in schools: the moderating effects of homophobic bullying and school climate on negative outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(7), 989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9389-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bowes, L., Maughan, B., Ball, H., Shakoor, S., Ouellet-Morin, I., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Arseneault, L. (2013). Chronic bullying victimization across school transitions: the role of genetic and environmental influences. Development and Psychopathology, 25(2), 333–346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2000). Shame and criminal justice. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42, 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (2003). Restorative justice and a better future. In E. McLaughlin, R. Fergusson, G. Hughes, & L. E. Westmarland (Eds.), Restorative justice: Critical issues (pp. 54–65). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. C., Low, S., Smith, B. H., & Haggerty, K. P. (2011). Outcomes from a school-randomized controlled trial of steps to respect: a bullying prevention program. School Psychology Review, 40, 423–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18, 140–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, N., & Rofes, E. (2007). School Bullying: Do Adult Survivors Perceive Long-Term Effects? Traumatology, 13(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534765607299911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chingos, M. M., & Blagg, K. (2017). Making sense of state school funding policy. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cougnard, A., Marcelis, M., Myin-Germeys, I., De Graaf, R., Vollebergh, W., Krabbendam, L., Lieb, R., Wittchen, H. U., Henquet, C., & Spauwen, J. (2007). Does normal developmental expression of psychosis combine with environmental risk to cause persistence of psychosis? A psychosis proneness–persistence model. Psychological Medicine, 37(04), 513–527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, H. (2013). Restorative approaches in schools. In H. Cremin, E. Sellman, & G. McCluskey (Eds.), Restorative approaches to conflict in schools. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00145-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S., & Davis, J. (2007). Empowering Bystanders in Bullying Prevention, Grades K-8. Champaign: Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: some theoretical notes. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 10, 275–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinkes, R., Kemp, J., & Baum, K. (2009). Indicators of school crime and safety: (NCES 2009-022/NCJ 226343). Washington, DC.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L. (2016). Leveraging school-based research to inform bullying prevention and policy. The American Psychologist, 71(8), 768–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2004). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2010). In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), A social-ecological model for bullying prevention and intervention: Understanding the impact of adults in the social ecology of youngsters. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, A., Justinger, B., Pelischek, E., & Schulz, S. (2009). Zero tolerance policies and the public schools: When suspension is no longer effective. National Association of School Psychologists Communiqué, 37(5), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., Hamm, J. V., Lane, K. L., Lee, D., Sutherland, K. S., & Hall, C. M. (2013). Conceptual foundations and components of a contextual intervention to promote student engagement in early adolescence: the supporting early adolescent learning and social success (SEALS) model. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 23(2), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.785181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1993). Understanding and preventing bullying. Crime and Justice, 17, 381–458. https://doi.org/10.1086/449217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. (2009). School based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2009.6.

  • Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2011). Bullying as a predictor of offending, violence and later life outcomes. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(2), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, B. A. (2003). Restitution and restorative justice in juvenile justice and school discipline. Youth Studies Australia, 22(4), 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garandeau, C. F., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). Tackling acute cases of school bullying in the KiVa anti-bullying program: a comparison of two approaches. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(6), 981–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9861-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garrity, C. B. (2004). Bully-proofing your school: Teacher’s manual and lesson plans for elementary schools. Dallas: Sopris West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, A., Jordan, P., & Change, H. (2014). Absences Add up: How school attendance influences student success. Oakland: Attendance Works https://www.attendanceworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Absenses-Add-Up_September-3rd-2014.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glew, G. M., Fan, M. Y., Katon, W., Rivara, F. P., & Kernic, M. A. (2005). Bullying, psychosocial adjustment, and academic performance in elementary school. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159(11), 1026–1031. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.159.11.1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, T. (2012). Keeping kids in schools: restorative justice, punitive discipline, and the school to prison pipeline. Journal of Law & Education, 41(2), 281–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102(3), 458–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R. (1998/2009). The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, N. (2001). Shaming, and shame: regulating drunk-driving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, E. V., & Perry, D. G. (1996). Victims of Peer Abuse: An Overview. Reclaiming Children and Youth: Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Problems, 5(1), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33(3), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027580.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J. S., Peguero, A. A., Espelage, D. L., & Allen-Meares, P. (2016). Preventing violence and victimization among racial/ethnic minority and immigrant youth: Looking beyond the individual factors. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymel, S., McClure, R., Miller, M., Shumka, E., & Trach, J. (2015). Addressing school bullying: insights from theories of group processes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Is low empathy related to bullying after controlling for individual and social background variables? Journal of Adolescence, 34(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.02.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J., Graham, S., & Schuster, M. A. (2003). Bullying among young adolescents: the strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112(6 Pt 1), 1231–1237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpela, M., Rantanen, P., & Rimpela, A. (2000). Bullying at school--an indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. Journal of Adolescence, 23(6), 661–674. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2000.0351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kasen, S., Berenson, K., Cohen, P., & Johnson, J. G. (2004). The effects of school climate on changes in aggressive behavior and other behaviors related to bullying. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 187–210). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, C. A. (2008). School absenteeism and school refusal behavior in youth: a contemporary review. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(3), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.07.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A., Kumpulainen, K., Piha, J., Tamminen, T., Moilanen, I., & Gould, M. S. (2008). Childhood bullying as a risk for later depression and suicidal ideation among Finnish males. Journal of Affective Disorders, 109(1–2), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.12.226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. H. (2011). An ecological systems approach to bullying behaviors among middle school students in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1664–1693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510370591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, L., & Welander-Vatn, A. (2013). Factors associated with the persistence of bullying victimization from 10th grade to 13th grade: a longitudinal study . Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 9, 243–250. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901309010243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R., & Dishion, T. (1983). Early predictors of male delinquency: a review. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 68–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1993). Victimization by peers: Antecedents and long-term outcomes. In K. H. Rubin & J. B. Asendorf (Eds.), Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness (pp. 315–341). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X. (2002). Bullying in middle school: individual and school characteristics of victims and offenders. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.13.1.63.3438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macevoy, J. P., & Leff, S. S. (2012). Children’s sympathy for peers who are the targets of peer aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(7), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9636-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, S. (2009). A system gone berserk: how are zero-tolerance policies really affecting schools? Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 53(3), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.53.3.153-158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCluskey, C. P., Bynum, T. S., & Patchin, J. W. (2004). Reducing chronic absenteeism: an assessment of an early truancy initiative. Crime and Delinquency, 50(2), 214–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128703258942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525–543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirsky, L. (2007). SaferSanerSchools: Transforming school cultures with restorative practices. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 16(2), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirskky, L., & Wachtel, T. (2007). The worst school I’ve ever been to: empirical evaluations of a restorative school and treatment milieu. Reclaiming Children and Youth, Summer, 2007, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, B. (2002). Bullying and victimization in schools: A restorative justice approach (Vol. 219). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, B. (2007). Restoring safe school communities: A whole school response to bullying, violence and alienation. Annandale: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA, 285(16), 2094–2100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nansel, T. R., Craig, W., Overpeck, M. D., Saluja, G., & Ruan, W. J. (2004). Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158(8), 730–736. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.158.8.730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (1992). Bullying among school children: intervention and prevention. In R. D. Peters, R. J. McMahon, & V. L. Quinsey (Eds.), Aggression and violence throughout the lifespan (pp. 100–125). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H., & Aronow, P. M. (2016). Changing climates of conflict: a social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(3), 566–571. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514483113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pepler, D., Smith, P. K., & Rigby, K. (2004). Looking back and looking forward: Implications for making interventions work effectively. In P. K. Smith, D. Pepler, & K. Rigby (Eds.), Bullying in schools: How successful can schools be? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pikas, A. (2002). New developments of the shared concern method. School Psychology International, 23(3), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034302023003234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., & Salimivalli, C. (2010). What does it take to stand up for the victim of bullying?: the interplay between personal and social factors. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 56(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., Skiba, R. J., Graham, S., et al. (2008). Are Zero Tolerance Policies Effective in the Schools? An Evidentiary Review and Recommendations. American Psychologist, 63(9), 852–862. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K. (2000). Effects of peer victimization in schools and perceived social support on adolescent well-being. J Adolescence, 23(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1999.0289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K. (2007). Bullying in schools: And what to do about it. Victoria: Acer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, K., & Griffiths, C. (2011). Addressing cases of bullying through the method of shared concern. School Psychology International, 32(3), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034311402148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivara, F., & Le Menestrel, S. (2016). Preventing bullying through science, policy, and practice. Washington (DC): National Academies Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G., & Maines, B. (2003). Crying for help: The no blame approach to bullying. Bristol: Lucky Duck Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G., & Maines, B. (2008). Bullying: A complete guide to the support group method. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, E., & Galloway, D. (2002). Classroom influences on bullying. Educational Research, 44(3), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188022000031597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. A., Espelage, D. L., & Monda-Amaya, L. E. (2009). Bullying and victimisation rates among students in general and special education: a comparative analysis. Educational Psychology, 29(7), 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903254864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. T., Ryan, C., Toomey, R. B., Diaz, R. M., & Sanchez, J. (2011). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adolescent school victimization: implications for young adult health and adjustment. Journal of School Health, 81, 223–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saarento, S., Boulton, A. J., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Reducing bullying and victimization: student- and classroom-level mechanisms of change. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9841.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Poskiparta, E., Ahtola, A., & Haataja, A. (2013). The implementation and effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying program in Finland. European Psychologist, 18(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, A. L., Bradshaw, C. P., & O'Brennan, L. M. (2008). Examining Ethnic, Gender, and Developmental Differences in the Way Children Report Being a Victim of “Bullying” on Self-Report Measures. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.12.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seals, D., & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38(152), 735–747.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J. (2013). Zero tolerance, suspension, and expulsion: Questions of equity and effectiveness. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., Ritter, S., Simmons, A., Peterson, R., & Miller, C. (2006). The Safe and Responsive Schools Project: A school reform model for implementing best practices in violence prevention. In S. R. Jimerson & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice (pp. 631–650). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., Howard, S. J., & Thompson, F. (2007). Use of the support group method to tackle bullying, and evaluation from schools and local authorities in England. Pastoral Care in Education, 25(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0122.2007.00402.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, A. D. (2010). Solution team: A program evaluation of an anti-bullying intervention. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved August 1, 2017 from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI Number: 3434806).

  • Steiner, R. J., & Rasberry, C. N. (2015). Brief report: associations between in-person and electronic bullying victimization and missing school because of safety concerns among U.S. high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.05.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swearer, S., Espelage, D., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010). What can be done about school bullying?:linking research to educational practice. Educational Researcher, 39, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P. (1995). Shame and guilt in interpersonal relationships. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., Hill-Barlow, D., Marschall, D. E., & Gramzow, R. (1996). Relation of shame and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal Personal and Social Psychology, 70, 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. P., Sims, L., Kingree, J. B., & Windle, M. (2008). Longitudinal associations between problem alcohol use and violent victimization in a national sample of adolescents. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2008a). Bullying: Short-term and long-term effects, and the importance of defiance theory in explanation and prevention. Victims and Offenders, 3, 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564880802143397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2008b). Reintegrative shaming theory, moral emotions and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 34(4), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, M. S. (1998). Restorative justice through victim offender mediation: A multi-site assessment. Western Criminology Review, 1(1). ISSN 1096-4886 http://www.westerncriminology.org/Western_Criminology_Review.htm.

  • van der Ploeg, R., Steglich, C., & Veenstra, R. (2016). The support group approach in the Dutch KiVa anti-bullying programme: effects on victimisation, defending and well-being at school. Educational Research, 58(3), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1184949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noorden, T. H., Haselager, G. J., Cillessen, A. H., & Bukowski, W. M. (2015). Empathy and involvement in bullying in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(3), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0135-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vossekuil, B., Fein, R. A., Reddy, M., Borum, R., & Modzeleski, W. (2002). The final report and findings of the safe school initiative: implications for the prevention of school attacks in the United States. Washington: US Secret Service and US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warachan, B. (2011). Appropriate Statistical analysis for two independent groups of likert-type data (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from American University Digital Research Archive. Ref # Warachan_american_0008E_10166. https://auislandora.wrlc.org/islandora/object/thesesdissertations%3A159/datastream/PDF/view. Accessed 12 Dec 2018.

  • Wumser, L. (1987). Shame: The veiled companion of narcissism. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M. L., Prescott, T. L., & Espelage, D. L. (2016). Stepwise development a text messaging-based bullying prevention program for middle school students (BullyDown). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 4(2), e60. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4936.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, H., & Gohar, A. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Brattleboro: Good Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions and support of Nicholas Carlisle, the founder and Chief Executive Officer of No Bully, for ensuring that the description of the intervention model was accurate and that the literature review included relevant references. He also contributed to the design of the Solution Team log itself, several years ago, as a means of tracking how the intervention was being implemented at client sites. That tool and the data it generates are the intellectual property of No Bully, which means that Mr. Carlisle had to allow the researchers to access the de-identified dataset derived from No Bully’s Solution Team logs, which is the basis of the analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Moira DeNike, Ph.D. is the primary author of the article. She conducted all of the analysis of the Solution Team log data and wrote the bulk of the text in the manuscript.

Holly Gordon, DMH is the second author. She assisted by producing a first draft of the literature review section, and critically reviewing and revising the draft manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with ethical standards and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Solution Team logs were originally designed to collect internally relevant evaluative data, meant to provide schools and No Bully with information as to the impact of Solution Team. The data were not collected with the purpose of contributing to generalizable knowledge, nor were they administered by the investigators of this study. As such, no informed consent procedure was administered, other than the standard process for obtaining consent to participate in the Solution Team process itself. As the effectiveness of the model became evident through the evaluation process, the investigators of this study were provided access to evaluation log data, stripped of all identifying information, in order to run the analyses that are the basis of the article.

Conflict of Interest

Moira DeNike, Ph.D. is an independent evaluator who provides consulting services to various youth-serving nonprofits and public agencies. She has received compensation from No Bully in the past, serving as the organization’s program evaluator. The time spent conducting analysis, research, and writing for this article, however, was not compensated in any way. Holly Gordon is a member of the Board of Directors of No Bully. This is a position that includes no compensation, monetary or other, but is a notable connection to the organization.

Assurance

Our article, “Solution Team: Outcomes of a Target-Centered Approach to Resolving School Bullying,” has not been previously published, nor is it being considered for publication elsewhere.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeNike, M., Gordon, H. Solution Team: Outcomes of a Target-Centered Approach to Resolving School Bullying. Contemp School Psychol 24, 181–195 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-019-00234-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-019-00234-3

Keywords

Navigation