Advertisement

Gender and Sexual Minority Students’ Engagement with School: the Impacts of Grades, Feeling Unsafe, and Gay/Straight Alliances

  • Cynthia E. HazelEmail author
  • N. Eugene Walls
  • Lacey Pomerantz
Article
  • 362 Downloads

Abstract

Compared to the general student population, gender and sexual minority (GSM) students are at increased risk of low academic achievement, poor attendance, and not completing high school with their cohort. One construct that has the potential to identify GSM students at increased risk for negative educational outcomes is school engagement. Based on self-report data from 411 middle and high school GSM students who attended community sexual minority youth support programming, this study utilized statistical stepwise regression to develop a model of behavioral and demographic variables that predicted a sexual minority student’s engagement with school. Confirmatory hierarchical regression found that school grades, feeling unsafe, and presence of a school-based Gay/Straight Alliance support group accounted for 31% of the variance seen in student school engagement scores. Recommendations for supporting the engagement of GSM students and future research are given.

Keywords

Gender and sexual minority students LGBTQ Student school engagement 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (2009). Missing Data. In R. E. Millsap & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology (pp. 72–89). Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications Inc..Google Scholar
  2. Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & MacIver, D. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educ Psychol, 42, 223–235.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701621079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bobko, P. (2001). Correlation and regression: Applications for industrial organizational psychology and management (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruce, M., Bridgeland, J. M., Fox, J. H., & Balfanz, R. (2011). On track for success: The use of early warning indicator and intervention systems to build a grad nation. Washington, D.C.: Civic Enterprises & Everyone Graduates Center at Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  5. Buhi, E. R., Goodson, P., & Neilands, T. B. (2008). Out of sight, not out of mind: Strategies for handling missing data. Am J Health Behav, 32, 83–92.  https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.32.1.8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance 2013. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs/index.htm.
  7. Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gurnar & A. L. Straufe (Eds.), Self-process and development: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 43–77). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  9. Connor, J. (2008). Student engagement in an independent research project: The influence of cohort culture. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 8–38.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X0902100102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Craig, S. L., & Smith, M. S. (2014). The impact of perceived discrimination and social support on the school performance of multiethnic sexual minority youth. Youth Soc, 46(1), 30–50.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X11424915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
  12. Della, B., Wilson, M., & Miller, R. L. (2002). Strategies for managing heterosexism used among African American gay and bisexual men. The Journal of Black Psychology, 28, 371–391.  https://doi.org/10.1177/009579802237543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Rev Educ Res, 59, 117–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, E. S., & Kennedy, K. S. (2012). Responsive school practices to support lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning students and families. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 305–321). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Furlong, M. J., Whipple, A. D., St. Jean, G., Simental, J., Soliz, A., & Punthuna, S. (2003). Multiple contexts of school engagement: Moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice. California School Psychologist, 8, 99–113.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodenow, C., & Szalacha, L. (2003). Which schools are safer for sexual minority adolescents? Paper presented at the American Psychological Association convention. Toronto: Ontario.Google Scholar
  19. Goodenow, C., Szalacha, L., & Westheimer, K. (2006). School support groups, other school factors, and the safety of sexual minority adolescents. Psychol Sch, 43, 573–589.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grossman, A. H., Haney, A. P., Edwards, P., Alessi, E. J., Ardon, M., & Howell, T. J. (2009). Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth talk about experiencing and coping with school violence: A qualitative study. Journal of LGBT Youth, 6, 24–46.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19361650802379748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen, A. L. (2007). School-based support for GLBT students: A review of three levels of research. Psychol Sch, 44, 839–847.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hazel CE, Jack C, Wonner R, Albanes J (2009) Measuring student school engagement: Analysis of three measures. Poster presented at the 41st Annual National Conference of the National Association of School Psychologists, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Hazel, C. E., Vazirabadi, G. E., & Gallagher, J. (2013). Measuring aspirations, belonging, and productivity in secondary students: Validation of the student school engagement measure. Psychol Sch, 50, 689–704.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hazel, C. E., Vazirabadi, G. E., Albanes, J., & Gallagher, J. (2014). Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the student school engagement measure. Psychol Assess, 26, 806–814.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036277.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hazel, C. E. (2016). Empowered Learning in Secondary Schools: Promoting Positive Youth Development through a Multi-Tiered System of Supports. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  26. Heck, N. C., Poteat, V. P., & Goodenow, C. S. (2016). Advances in research with LGBTQ youth in schools. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 3(4), 381–385.  https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000206.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, T. (2015). Policy and gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex students. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones, R. P., Cox, D., & Navarro-Rivera, J. (2014). A shifting landscape: A decade of change in American attitudes about same-sex marriage and LGBT issues. Public Religion Research Institute, Washington, D.C..Google Scholar
  29. Kena, G., Aud, S., Johnson, F., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Rathbun, A., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., & Kristapovich, P. (2014). The condition of education 2014 (NCES 2014–083). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.Google Scholar
  30. Kosciw, J. G., Greytak, E. A., Diaz, E. M., & Bartkiewicz, M. J. (2010). The 2009 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered youth in our nation’s schools. New York: Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Educational Network.Google Scholar
  31. Kosciw, J. G., Greytak, E. A., Palmer, N. A., & Boesen, M. J. (2014). The 2013 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth in our nation’s schools. New York: GLSEN.Google Scholar
  32. Kosciw, J. G., Greytak, E. A., Giga, N. M., Villenas, C., & Danischewski, D. J. (2016). The 2015 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth in our nation’s schools. New York: GLSEN.Google Scholar
  33. Kull, R. M., Kosciw, J. G., & Greytak, E. A. (2015). From statehouse to schoolhouse: Anti-bullying policy efforts in U.S. states and school districts. New York: GLSEN.Google Scholar
  34. Lasser, J., Tharinger, D., & Cloth, A. (2006). Gay, lesbian, and bisexual youth. In G. Bear & K. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, Prevention, and Intervention (pp. 419–430). Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, C. (2002). The impact of belonging to a high school gay/straight alliance. High Sch J, 85, 13–26.  https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2002.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mudrey, R., & Medina-Adams, A. (2006). Attitudes, perceptions, and knowledge of pre-service teachers regarding the educational isolation of sexual minority youth. J Homosex, 51, 63–90.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v51n04_04.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. National Association of School Psychologists. (2004). Position paper on sexual minority youth. Bethesda: Author.Google Scholar
  38. Nunnally, J. O. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  39. Pearson, J., Muller, C., & Wilkinson, L. (2007). Adolescent same-sex attraction and academic outcomes: The role of school attachment and engagement. Soc Probl, 54, 523–542.  https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.4.523.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rivers, K., & Noret, N. (2008). Well-being among same-sex- and opposite-sex-attracted youth at school. Sch Psychol Rev, 37, 174–187.Google Scholar
  42. Robinson, J. P., & Espelage, D. L. (2011). Inequities in educational and psychological outcomes between LGBTQ and straight students in middle and high school. Educ Res, 40, 315–330.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00113189X11422112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Russell, S. T. (2005). Beyond risk: Resilience in the lives of sexual minority youth. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Issues in Education, 2(3), 5–18.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J367v02n03_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seelman, K. L., Walls, N. E., Hazel, C., & Wisneski, H. (2012). Student school engagement among sexual minority students: Understanding the contributors to predicting academic outcomes. J Soc Serv Res, 38, 3–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2011.583829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, E., Jones, T., Ward, R., Dixon, J., Mitchell, A., & Hillier, L. (2014). From blues to rainbows: The mental health and well-being of gender diverse and transgender young people in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health, and Society.Google Scholar
  46. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  47. Thompson, R. (2006). Nurturing future generations: Promoting resilience in children and adolescents through social, emotional and cognitive skills (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Toomey, R. B., & Russell, S. T. (2011). Gay-straight alliances, social justice involvement, and school victimization of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer youth: Implications for school well-being and plans to vote. Youth Soc, 20, 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X11422546.Google Scholar
  49. Ullman, J. (2017). Teacher positivity towards gender diversity: Exploring relationships and school outcomes for transgender and gender-diverse students. Sex Education, 17(3), 276–289.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2016.1273104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. United Nations Educational, Scientific, & Cultural Organization. (2016a). Out in the open: Education sector response to violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  51. United Nations Educational, Scientific, & Cultural Organization. (2016b). Reaching out: Preventing and addressing SOGIE-related school violence in Viet Nam. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  52. Walls, N. E., Kane, S., & Wisneski, H. (2010). Gay-straight alliances and school experiences of sexual minority youth. Youth Soc, 41, 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walls, N. E., Wisneski, H., & Kane, S. B. (2013). School climate, individual support, or both? Gay straight alliances and the mental health of sexual minority youth. School Social Work Journal, 37, 88–111.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X09334957.Google Scholar
  54. Waters, S., Cross, D., & Runions, K. (2009). Social and ecological structures supporting adolescent connectedness to school: A theoretical model. J Sch Health, 79, 516–524.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00443.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wylie, C., & Hodgen, E. (2012). Trajectories and patterns of student engagement: Evidence from a longitudinal study. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 585–599). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© California Association of School Psychologists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Child, Family, and School PsychologyUniversity of DenverDenverUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of Social WorkUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations