In 2013, VA became the first state to mandate the use of threat assessment teams in its K-12 public schools. We provide an account of the development and adaptation of threat assessment as a school safety practice and research on the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines in VA schools. We describe the state law and the question of whether suicide assessment should be considered a form of threat assessment. We then describe research on the statewide implementation of threat assessment and summarize results indicating overall positive outcomes for schools who are actively engaged in threat assessment, but qualitative findings from a needs assessment identified team training gaps as well as a need to orient the larger school community to the threat assessment process. We describe a series of online programs to educate students, parents, teachers, and other school staff about the threat assessment process. In conclusion, this paper presents some lessons learned in the statewide implementation of threat assessment as a safe and effective violence prevention strategy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Dr. Dewey Cornell led this research group and is the principal developer of the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines.
VA law does not prescribe a specific model of threat assessment but requires that any model be consistent with the model policies developed by the Virginia Center for School and Campus Safety. The Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines developed at the University of Virginia is recognized in the model policies document as one such model.
American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effect in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63, 852–862. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.852.
Borum, R., Cornell, D., Modzeleski, W., & Jimerson, S. R. (2010). What can be done about school shootings?: a review of the evidence. Educational Researcher, 39, 27–37. doi:10.3102/0013189X09357620.
Cooper, A., Levin, B., & Campbell, C. (2009). The growing (but still limited) importance of evidence in education policy and practice. Journal of Educational Change, 10, 159–171.
Cornell, D. (2009). Recommended practices for Virginia college threat assessment. Richmond: Prepared for the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services’ School Safety Center.
Cornell, D., & Allen, K. (2011). Development, evaluation, and future directions of the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines. Journal of School Violence, 10, 88–106. doi:10.1080/15388220.2010.519432.
Cornell, D., Allen, K., & Fan, X. (2012). A randomized controlled study of the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines in grades K-12. School Psychology Review, 41, 100–115.
Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2011). Reductions in long-term suspensions following adoption of the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 95, 175–194.
Cornell, D., & Lovegrove, P. (2015). Student threat assessment as a method for reducing student suspensions. In D. Losen (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: research for policymakers (pp. 180–191). New York: Teachers College Press.
Cornell, D., Maeng, J., Burnette, A. G., Datta, P., Huang, F., & Jia, Y. (2016). Threat assessment in Virginia schools: technical report of the Threat Assessment Survey for 2014–2015. Charlottesville: Curry School of Education, University of Virginia.
Cornell, D., Maeng, J., Burnette, A. G., Jia, Y., Huang, F., Konold, T., Datta, P., Malone, M., & Meyer, P. (2017a). Student threat assessment as a standard school safety practice: Results from a statewide implementation study. School Psychology Quarterly (in press).
Cornell, D., Maeng, J., Huang, F., Shukla, K., & Konold, T. (2017b). Racial/ethnic parity in disciplinary consequences using student threat assessment. School Psychology Review (in press).
Cornell, D., & Sheras, P. (2006). Guidelines for responding to student threats of violence. https://www.amazon.com/Guidelines-Responding-Student-Threats-Violence/dp/1593185022
Cornell, D., Sheras, P., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2009). A retrospective study of school safety conditions in high schools using the Virginia Threat Assessment Guidelines versus alternative approaches. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 119–129. doi:10.1037/a0016182.
Cornell, D., Sheras, P., Kaplan, S., McConville, D., Douglass, J., Elkon, A., McKnight, L., Branson, C., & Cole, J. (2004). Guidelines for student threat assessment: field-test findings. School Psychology Review, 33, 527–546.
Council on School Health. (2013). Out-of-school suspension and expulsion. Pediatrics, 131, e1000–e1007. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3932.
Fein, R. A., Vossekuil, B., Pollack, W. S., Borum, R., Modzeleski, W., & Reddy, M. (2002). Threat assessment in schools: A guide to managing threatening situations and creating safe school climates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program and U.S. Secret Service, National Threat Assessment Center.
Just Children and Cornell, D. (2013). Prevention v. punishment: threat assessment, school suspensions, and racial disparities. Retrieved from http://curry.virginia.edu/uploads/resourceLibrary/UVA_and_JustChildren_Report_-_Prevention_v._Punishment.pdf
Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W.A., Shanklin, S.L., Flint, K.H., Hawkins, J., … & Zaza, S. (2016). Youth risk behavior surveillance United States, 2015. MMWR, 65, 1–174. Retrieved from doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6506a1.
Maeng, J. L., Burnette, A. G., Cornell, D., & Jia, Y. (2017). Student threat assessment as an innovative violence prevention strategy: results from a statewide implementation study. San Antonio: A poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association.
Meloy, J. R., & Hoffmann, J. (Eds.). (2014). International handbook of threat assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Morgan, E., Salomen, N., Plotkin, M., & Cohen, R. (2014). The school discipline consensus report: strategies from the field to keep students engaged in school and out of the juvenile justice system. New York: The Council of State Governments Justice Center Available from: http://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/The_School_Discipline_Consensus_Report.pdf.
National Association of School Psychologists School Safety and Crisis Response Committee. (2014). Threat assessment for school administrators and crisis teams. Bethesda: National Association of School Psychologists Available at https://www.nasponline.org/resources-and-publications/resources/school-safety-and-crisis/threat-assessment-at-school/threat-assessment-for-school-administrators-and-crisis-teams .
Nekvasil, E., & Cornell, D. (2012). Student reports of peer threats of violence: prevalence and outcomes. Journal of School Violence, 11, 357–375. doi:10.1080/15388220.2012.706764.
Nekvasil, E., & Cornell, D. (2015). Student threat assessment associated with positive school climate in middle schools. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2, 98–113. doi:10.1037/tam0000038.
National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (n.d.). Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines. http://legacy.nreppadmin.net/ViewIntervention.aspx?id=263
O’Toole, M. E. (2000). The school shooter: a threat assessment perspective. Quantico: FBI Academy, National Center for Analysis of Violent Crime Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/school-shooter .
Reddy, M., Borum, R., Vossekuil, B., Fein, R., Berglund, J., & Modzeleski, W. (2001). Evaluating risk for targeted violence in schools: comparing risk assessment, threat assessment, and other approaches. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 157–172.
Stohlman, S., & Cornell, D. (2017). An online educational program to increase student understanding of threat assessment. Poster to be presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC.
Strong, K., & Cornell, D. (2008). Student threat assessment in Memphis City schools: a descriptive report. Behavioral Disorders, 34, 42–54.
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2016). Civil Rights Data Collection, 2011–12. Available at http://ocrdata.ed.gov
Virginia. (2008). Code of Virginia § 23–9.2:10 (recodified as § 23.1–805 on October 1, 2016). Violence prevention committee; threat assessment team.
Virginia. (2013). Code of Virginia § 22.1–79.4. Threat assessment teams and oversight committees.
Virginia Tech Review Panel (2007). Mass shootings at Virginia Tech: April 16, 2007. https://governor.virginia.gov/media/3772/fullreport.pdf
Vossekuil, B., Fein, R., Reddy, M., Borum, R., & Modzeleski, W. (2002). The final report and findings of the Safe School Initiative: implications for the prevention of school attacks in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Secret Service and U.S. Department of Education.
Weiss, C. H., Murphy-Graham, E., Petrosino, A., & Gandhi, A. G. (2008). The fairy godmother—and her warts making the dream of evidence-based policy come true. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 29–47.
Zhang, A., Musu-Gillette, L., & Oudekerk, B. A. (2016). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2015. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016079.pdf
We thank members of our research team including Anna Grace Burnette, Pooja Datta, Frances Huang, Yuane Jia, Timothy Konold, Patrick Meyer, and Shelby Stohlman. The project was conducted in cooperation with the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services.
This study was funded by Grant No. NIJ 2014-CK-BX-0004 awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Justice or the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The principal author of this report (Cornell) is the primary developer of the Virginia Student Threat Assessment Guidelines (VSTAG), one of the threat assessment models used in VA schools.
About this article
Cite this article
Cornell, D., Maeng, J. Statewide Implementation of Threat Assessment in Virginia K-12 Schools. Contemp School Psychol 22, 116–124 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0146-x
- School discipline
- School safety
- School violence
- Threat assessment
- Violence prevention