Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bringing Social Justice Principles to Practice: New Practitioners Speak

  • Published:
Contemporary School Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using consensual qualitative research methods, this qualitative study explored how nine recent graduates, all graduating within the past 7 years from an overtly social justice-oriented school psychology program, were experiencing social justice in practice. Semistructured interviews were conducted covering the following three theme areas: defining social justice, potential application of social justice principles to their practice, and evaluating their graduate training on social justice relative to their experiences as practitioners. Practitioners discussed barriers faced when implementing social justice in practice, and ways training programs can more effectively prepare trainees for advocacy work. The implications of this research include informing school psychology training models for social justice and stimulating the impetus for greater acknowledgment and emphasis on social justice research in school psychology literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briggs, A. (2013). The school psychologist as social justice advocate. In D. Shriberg, S. Y. Song, A. H. Miranda, & K. M. Radliff (Eds.), School psychology and social justice: conceptual foundations and tools for practice (pp. 294–310). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, A., McArdle, L., Bartucci, G., Kowalewicz, E., & Shriberg, D. (2009). Students’ perspectives on the incorporation of social justice in a school psychology graduate program. Trainer’s Forum, 28(4), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappadocia, M. C., Pepler, D., Cummings, J. G., & Craig, W. (2012). Individual motivations and characteristics associated with bystander intervention during bullying episodes among children and youth. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27, 201–216. doi:10.1177/08295735I2450567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, J. M., Curtis, M. J., & Gelley, C. (2012). School psychology 2010—part 2: school psychologists’ professional practices and implications for the field. Communiqué, 40(8), 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grapin, S. (2016). Social justice training in school psychology: applying principles of organizational consultation to facilitate change in graduate programs. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. doi:10.1080/10474412.2016.1217489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517. doi:10.1177/0011000097254001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International School Psychology Association (2011). Code of ethics. Retrieved November 13, 2015 from: http://www.ispaweb.org/wp/content/uploads/2013/01/ The_ISPA_Code_of_Ethics_2011.pdf.

  • Li, C., Kruger, L., Mulé, C., Lippus, K., Santora, K., Cicala, G., et al. (2009). Including social justice in the training of school psychologists. Trainer’s Forum, 28(4), 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, B., & Rogers, M. (2008). School consultants working for equity with families, teachers, and administrators. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 16(1&2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, P. C., & Robinson, F. (2008). Committing to social justice: the behavioral intention of school psychology and education trainees to advocate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered youth. School Psychology Review, 37(4), 469–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, A. H., Radliff, K. M., Cooper, J. M., & Eschenbrenner, C. R. (2014). Graduate student perceptions of the impact of training for social justice: development of a training model. Psychology in the Schools, 51, 348–365. doi:10.1002/pits.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moy, G., Briggs, A., Shriberg, D., Furrey, K. J., Smith, P., & Tompkins, N. (2014). Developing school psychologists as agents of social justice: a qualitative analysis of student understanding across three years. Journal of School Psychology, 52, 323–341. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2014.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nastasi, B. K. (2008). Social justice and school psychology. School Psychology Review, 37(4), 487–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of School Psychologists (2010). Model for comprehensive and integrated school psychological services. Bethesda: Author.

  • Nickerson, A. B., Aloe, A. M., & Werth, J. M. (2014). The relation of empathy and defending in bullying: a meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Review, 44, 372–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radliff, K. H., Miranda, A. H., Stoll, S., & Wheeler, A. (2009). A conceptual framework for infusing social justice in school psychology training. Trainer’s Forum, 28(4), 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratts, M. J., Singh, A. A., Nassar-McMillan, S., Butler, K., & Rafferty McCullough, J. (2016). Multicultural and social justice counseling competencies: guidelines for the counseling profession. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 44, 28–48. doi:10.1002/jmcd.12035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. R., & O’Bryon, E. C. (2008). Advocating for social justice: the context for change. School Psychology Review, 37(4), 493–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saumure, K., & Given, L. M. (2008). Data saturation. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 195–196). Thousand Oaks: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412963909.n99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriberg, D. (2016). Commentary: School psychologists as advocates for racial justice and social justice: some proposed steps. School Psychology Forum: Research Into Practice, 10, 337–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriberg, D., Bonner, M., Sarr, B., Walker, A., Hyland, M., & Chester, C. (2008). Social justice through a school psychology lens: definitions and applications. School Psychology Review, 37, 453–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriberg, D., Song, S. Y., Miranda, A. H., & Radliff, K. M. (2013). School psychology and social justice: conceptual foundations and tools for practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shriberg, D., Wynne, M. E., Bartucci, G., Briggs, A., & Lombardo, A. (2011). School psychologists’ perspectives on social justice. School Psychology Forum: Research in Practice, 5(2), 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. A., Urbano, A., Haston, M., & McMahon, E. (2010). School counselors’ strategies for social justice change: a grounded theory of what works in the real world. Professional School Counseling, 13, 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. L., & Proctor, S. L. (2016). The shield or the sword: revisiting the debate on racial disproportionality in special education and implications for school psychologists. School Psychology Forum: Research Into Practice, 10, 278–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, M., & Colvin, C. (2001). “Reading” families: deficit discourse and family literacy. Theory into Practice, 40, 212–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. A. S., & Crockett, D. P. (2012). Institutional barriers: poverty and education. In D. Shriberg, S. Y. Song, A. H. Miranda, & K. M. Radliff (Eds.), School psychology and social justice: conceptual foundations and tools for practice (pp. 137–154). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kisha V. Jenkins.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study received no outside funding.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they no conflict of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

Interview Protocol.

Defining Social Justice.

1. How do you define social justice?

2. What are your thoughts about how social justice may pertain to school psychology?

3. Has your perspective of social justice changed since you have become a practitioner? If yes, how so?

Social Justice Examples from Practice.

4. Do you have an example from your practice in which you believe you applied social justice principles?

5. Are there obstacles you have faced in applying social justice to your practice?

6. To what extent, if any, have you faced challenges imbuing your practice with social justice? Why?

7. Are there allies that you align yourself with?

Evaluation of Graduate Program Preparation in Social Justice.

8. What are your evaluations of your graduate program’s effectiveness in training for social justice? What were the strengths? Weaknesses? Suggestions for improvement?

9. What haven’t we discussed that is pertinent to applying of social justice to practice?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jenkins, K.V., Shriberg, D., Conway, D. et al. Bringing Social Justice Principles to Practice: New Practitioners Speak. Contemp School Psychol 22, 63–76 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0129-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0129-y

Keywords

Navigation