Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nonverbal and Language-Reduced Measures of Cognitive Ability: a Review and Evaluation

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
Contemporary School Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the number of new and revised nonverbal and language-reduced tests of cognitive ability, selection and interpretation of appropriate measures can be complicated. Seven nonverbal or language-reduced tests with normative data collected within the last 15 years were evaluated. Besides evaluating technical adequacy, other variables affecting test selection and interpretation including adequacy of floors and item gradients, provision of data for subgroups of students, percent of timed items, and response mode are described. Eight additional tests with language-reduced components also were reviewed. Implications for practice and research are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Third ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

  • Bracken, B. A. (1987). Limitations of preschool instruments and standards for minimal levels of technical adequacy. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 4, 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A. (1988). Ten psychometric reasons why similar tests produce dissimilar results. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, R. S. (1998) Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

  • Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, R. S. (2016). Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (Second ed.). Austin: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnsen, S. K. (2010). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (Fourth ed.). Austin: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, C., Dennison, A., & Estrella, I. (2014). Best practices in the assessment of English language learners. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology VI (pp. 75–87). Bethesda: NASP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeThorne, L. S., & Schaefer, B. A. (2004). A guide to child nonverbal IQ measures. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 275–290. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2004/029).

  • Ehrler, D. J., & McGhee, R. L. (2008). Primary Test of Nonverbal Intelligence. Austin: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C. D. (2008). Differential Abilities Scale (Second ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, D. P., Alfonso, V. C., & Dynda, A. M. (2008). Best practices in cognitive assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 633–650). Bethesda: NASP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 29–51. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, J. R. (1998). WAIS-III and WISC-III: IQ gains in the United States from 1972 to 1995: how to compensate for obsolete norms. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 1231–1239. doi:10.2466/pms.1998.86.3c.1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, T. W., & Youngstrom, E. A. (2007). Historical increase in the number of factors measured by commercial tests of cognitive ability: are we overfactoring? Intelligence, 35, 169–182. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, D. D., & Bryant, B. (2005). Detroit Test of Learning Aptitude-Primary (Third ed.). Austin: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N., & Wiederholt, L. J. (2009). Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (Second ed.). Austin: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanaya, T., Scullin, M. J., & Ceci, S. J. (2003). The Flynn Effect and US policies: the impact of rising IQ scores on American society via mental retardation diagnoses. American Psychologist, 58, 778–790. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.10.778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (Second ed.). Circle Pines: AGS.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, R. S. (2003). Context for nonverbal assessment of intelligence and related abilities. In R. S. McCallum (Ed.), Handbook of nonverbal assessment (pp. 3–21). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, R. J. (2016). Investigation of the factor structure of the Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence-Second Edition (CTONI-2) using exploratory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34, 339–350. doi:10.1177/0734282915610717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A., & Otero, T. M. (2012). The Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of Ability. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: theories, tests, and issues (pp. 436–455). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, S. O. (2014). Best practices in nondiscriminatory assessment. In P. L. Harrison & A. Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology VI (pp. 61–74). Bethesda: NASP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, S. O., & Ochoa, S. H. (2005). Cognitive assessment of culturally and linguistically diverse individuals. In R. L. Rhodes, S. H. Ochoa, & S. O. Ortiz (Eds.), Assessing culturally and linguistically diverse students (pp. 168–201). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. A., & Wilson, V. L. (2006). Measurement and assessment in the classroom. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H., Miller, L. J., Pomplun, M., & Koch, C. (2013). Leiter International Performance Scale (Third ed.). Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H. (2003). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales (Fifth ed.). Itasca: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H., & Sampers, J. L. (2004). Merrill-Palmer-revised: scales of development. Wood Dale: Stoelting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J., & Bolt, S. (2010). Assessment in special and inclusive education (11th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. (2008). Assessment of children: cognitive foundations (5th ed.). La Mesa: Jerome M. Sattler Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simeonsson, R. J., Wax, T. M., & White, K. (2001). Assessment of children who are deaf or hard of hearing. In R. J. Simeonsson & S. L. Rosenthal (Eds.), Psychological and developmental assessment: children with disabilities and chronic conditions (pp. 248–266). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2012). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (Fourth ed.). San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (Fifth ed.). Bloomington: NCS Pearson, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Fourth ed.). San Antonio: NCS Pearson, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D., & Naglieri, J. A. (2006). Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of Ability. San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Zhu, J., & Weiss, L. G. (2010). Peeking inside the “black box” of the Flynn effect: evidence from three Wechsler instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 399–411. doi:10.1177/073428291-37340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI, 48859, USA

    Daniel D. Drevon & Sharon Bradley-Johnson

  2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health Systems, 1011 Cornwell Pl, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA

    Rachel M. Knight

Authors
  1. Daniel D. Drevon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rachel M. Knight
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sharon Bradley-Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel D. Drevon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drevon, D.D., Knight, R.M. & Bradley-Johnson, S. Nonverbal and Language-Reduced Measures of Cognitive Ability: a Review and Evaluation. Contemp School Psychol 21, 255–266 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-016-0114-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-016-0114-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation