Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of two Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) early literacy measures with first-grade Korean speaking English Learners (ELs). A total of 30 first-grade Korean ELs were screened three times during the year using early literacy measures from DIBELS. A sample of students was provided an empirically supported phonological awareness (PA) intervention to determine whether DIBELS measures were sensitive to growth caused by an intervention. Results suggest screening measures of phoneme segmentation fluency (phoneme segmentation fluency, PSF) were not predictive of reading performance at the middle and end of first grade. Measures of alphabetics (nonsense word fluency, NWF) were predictive of reading skills for this sample of first-grade Korean ELs. PSF and NWF were sensitive to change caused by an intervention, and appear to be able to be used to monitor the impact of a PA intervention. Implications and recommendations for the use of DIBELS with Korean speaking ELs are provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
APA, AERA, & NCME. (1999). Testing individuals of diverse linguistic backgrounds. In AERA/APA/NCME (Ed.), Standards for educational and psychological testing (pp. 91–97). Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
Baker, S. K., & Good, R. H. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: a validation study with second-grade students. School Psychology Review, 24, 561–578.
Cho, J. R., & McBride-Chang, C. (2005). Correlates of Korean Hangul acquisition among kindergartners and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 3–16.
Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934–945.
Durgunoglu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 453–465.
Edformation. (2007). AIMSweb growth tables. Retrieved July 13, 2007, from http://www.aimsweb.com/
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.
Fien, H., Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Smith, J. L., Kame’enui, E. J., & Beck, C. T. (2008). Using nonsense word fluency to predict reading proficiency in kindergarten through second grade for English learners and native English speakers. School Psychology Review, 37, 391–408.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45–58.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: a review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28, 659–671.
Gersten, R., Baker, S. K., Shanahan, T., Linan-Thompson, S., Collins, P., & Scarcella, R. (2007). Effective literacy and English language instruction for English learners in the elementary grades: a practice guide. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, M. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Education Achievement.
Haager, D. S., & Windmueller, M. P. (2001). Early reading intervention for English language learners at-risk for learning disabilities: student and teacher outcomes in an urban school. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 24, 235–250.
Healy, K., Vanderwood, M., & Edelston, D. (2005). Early literary interventions for English language learners: support for an RTI model. The California School Psychologist, 10, 55–63.
Hopstock, P. J., & Stephenson, T. G. (2003). Special Topic Report #1: Native languages of LEP students. Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/resabout/ research/descriptivestudyfiles/native_languages1.pdf
Kaminski, R. A., & Good, R. H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215–227.
Kindler, A. L. (2002). Survey of the states’ limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services: 2000-2001 summary report. Retrieved from National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition website: http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/files/rcd/BE021853/Survey_of_the_States.pdf
Klingner, J. K., & Edwards, P. (2006). Cultural considerations with response to intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 108–117.
Korean American Coalition-Census Information Center. (2003). Korean population in the United States, 2000. Retrieved from California State University, Center for Korean American and Korean Studies website: http://www.calstatela.edu/centers/ ckaks/census/ 7203_tables.pdf
Lesaux, N. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1005–1019.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). Reading 2009. National assessment of educational progress at grades 4 and 8. Retrieved from National Assessment for Educational Progress website: http://nationsreportcard.gov/reading_ 2009 /nat_g4.asp.
National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2007). The growing numbers of LEP students: 2005-2006 poster. Retrieved April 9, 2008, from http://www.ncela.gwu edu/stats/2_nation.htm.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Retrieved June 10, 2007, from http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/Publications.
O’Connor, R. E., & Jenkins, J. R. (1999). The prediction of reading disabilities in kindergarten and first grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 159–197.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Quiroga, T., Lemos-Britton, Z., Mostafapour, E., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2002). Phonological awareness and beginning reading in Spanish-speaking ESL first graders: Research into practice. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 85–111.
Riedel, B. W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 546–567.
Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2010). Assessment in special and inclusive education (11th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: a longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282.
Shin, J., Deno, S. L., & Espin, C. A. (2000). Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth. Journal of Special Education, 34, 164–172.
Shinn, M. R., & Shinn, M. M. (2002). AIMSweb training workbook: administration and scoring of reading maze for use in general outcome measurement. Retrieved February 10, 2007 from http://www.aimsweb.com
Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement reading fluency: a confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459–479.
Snow, C. E., Burns, S. M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children. Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175–190.
Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. M. (1995). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean, and Japanese. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Vanderwood, M. L. (2004). Phonemic Awareness and Vocabulary Intensive Intervention (PAVII) Version 1.0. Unpublished manual, Graduate School of Education, University of California-Riverside, Riverside, CA.
Vanderwood, M. L., & Nam, J. (2008). Best practices in using a response to intervention model with English language learners. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Vanderwood, M. L., Linklater, D., & Healy, K. (2008). Predictive accuracy of nonsense word fluency for English language learners. School Psychology Review, 37, 5–17.
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Tanzman, M. S. (1998). The case for early intervention in diagnosing specific reading disability. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 367–397.
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1993). The development of young readers’ phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 1–20.
Wiley, H. I., & Deno, S. L. (2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 207–214.
Zehler, A., Fleischman, H., Hopstock, P., Stephenson, T., Pendzick, M., & Sapru, S. (2003). Policy report: summary of findings related to LEP and SPED-LEP students. Retrieved from http://onlineresources.wnylc.net/pb/orcdocs/LARC_.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vanderwood, M.L., Nam, J.E. & Sun, J.W. Validity of DIBELS Early Literacy Measures with Korean English Learners. Contemp School Psychol 18, 205–213 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0032-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-014-0032-8