Skip to main content
Log in

G-invariant Hilbert schemes on Abelian surfaces and enumerative geometry of the orbifold Kummer surface

  • Research
  • Published:
Research in the Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For an Abelian surface A with a symplectic action by a finite group G, one can define the partition function for G-invariant Hilbert schemes

$$\begin{aligned} Z_{A, G}(q) = \sum _{d=0}^{\infty } e(\text {Hilb}^{d}(A)^{G})q^{d}. \end{aligned}$$

We prove the reciprocal \(Z_{A,G}^{-1}\) is a modular form of weight \(\frac{1}{2}e(A/G)\) for the congruence subgroup \(\Gamma _{0}(|G|)\) and give explicit expressions in terms of eta products. Refined formulas for the \(\chi _{y}\)-genera of \(\text {Hilb}(A)^{G}\) are also given. For the group generated by the standard involution \(\tau : A \rightarrow A\), our formulas arise from the enumerative geometry of the orbifold Kummer surface \([A/\tau ]\). We prove that a virtual count of curves in the stack is governed by \(\chi _{y}(\text {Hilb}(A)^{\tau })\). Moreover, the coefficients of \(Z_{A, \tau }\) are true (weighted) counts of rational curves, consistent with hyperelliptic counts of Bryan, Oberdieck, Pandharipande, and Yin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that \(G_{0}\) and \(G'\) are abstractly isomorphic. But we distinguish them because they are different groups acting on different spaces.

  2. Throughout, we must handle \(d=0\) separately. In this case, choose the product Abelian surface \(A=E \times F\), with \(\beta _{0}\) the class of \(E \times \{\text {pt}\}\).

  3. The definition of the BPS invariants by Maulik–Toda applies to Calabi–Yau threefold. But in the case of a local Calabi–Yau surface, the theory reduces to a theory of sheaves on the surface, see Sect. 4.1. Our results are therefore intrinsic to \([A/\tau ]\).

  4. In [5, Sec. 5.4] what we are calling \({\mathsf {h}}_{d}(g)\) was denoted \(\textsf {h}_{g, \beta }^{A,{\text {Hilb}}}\).

  5. This was equivalently carried out from a physics perspective in [21] by studying symmetry groups of certain nonlinear sigma models on the underlying real torus \(T^{4}\).

  6. We claim there are a few minor but relevant typos in Lemma 3.19 and equation (19) of [10]. Nonetheless, the ten actions described in Lemma 3.19 are precisely the ten non-trivial actions in Table 1.

  7. Here, \(M_{X}(0, 0, \beta , 1)\) is the moduli space of Simpson stable torsion sheaves on X with generic polarization, and Chern character \((0,0,\beta ,1) \in H^{2*}(X, {\mathbb {Z}})\). Moreover, \({\text {Chow}}_{\beta }(X)\) is the Chow variety of effective curves in the class \(\beta \).

  8. See Remark 1.7.

  9. Equivalently, \(\eta (q)\) is a modular form of weight \(\frac{1}{2}\) on the metaplectic double cover \(\text {Mp}_{2}({\mathbb {Z}})\) of \({\text {SL}}_{2}({\mathbb {Z}})\).

References

  1. Bartocci, C., Bruzzo, U., Ruipérez, D.H.: Fourier–Mukai and Nahm Transforms in Geometry and Mathematical Physics. Progress in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Basel (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Beauville, A.: Counting rational curves on \(K3\) surfaces. Duke Math. J. 97(1), 99–108 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bryan, J., Gyenge, Á.: \(G\)-fixed Hilbert schemes on \(K3\) surfaces, modular forms, and eta products. arXiv:1907.01535 [math] (2020)

  4. Bryan, J., Leung, N.: The enumerative geometry of K3 surfaces and modular forms. J. Am. Math. Soc. (1999)

  5. Bryan, J., Oberdieck, G., Pandharipande, R., Yin, Q.: Curve counting on abelian surfaces and threefolds. Algebr. Geom. 5(4), 398–463 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bryan, J., Pietromonaco, S.: Counting invariant curves: a theory of Gopakumar–Vafa invariants for Calabi–Yau threefolds with an involution. (in preparation)

  7. de Cataldo, M., Migliorini, L.: The decomposition theorem, perverse sheaves and the topology of algebraic maps. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 46(4), 535–633 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Eichler, M., Zagier, D.: The Theory of Jacobi Forms. Progress in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Basel (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Fantechi, B., Göttsche, L., van Straten, D.: Euler number of the compactified Jacobian and multiplicity of rational curves. J. Algebr. Geom. 8, 115–133 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujiki, A.: Finite automorphism groups of complex tori of dimension two. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 24(1), 1–97 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Göttsche, L.: The Betti numbers of the Hilbert scheme of points on a smooth projective surface. Mathematische Annalen 286(1–3), 193–208 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang, J.-M.: Base manifolds for fibrations of projective irreducible symplectic manifolds. Inventiones mathematicae 174(3), 625 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Iwaniec, H.: Topics in Classical Automorphic Forms, volume 17 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Katz, S.: Genus zero Gopakumar–Vafa invariants of contractible curves. J. Differ. Geom. 79(2), 185–195 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Katz, S.H., Klemm, A., Vafa, C.: M theory, topological strings and spinning black holes. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3, 1445–1537 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9910181

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Köhler, G.: Eta Products and Theta Series Identities. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Maulik, D., Toda, Y.: Gopakumar–Vafa invariants via vanishing cycles. Inventiones mathematicae 213(3), 1017–1097 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Pandharipande, R., Thomas, R.P.: The Katz–Klemm–Vafa conjecture for \(K3\) surfaces. Forum Math. Pi 4, e4 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Rose, S.: Counting hyperelliptic curves on Abelian surfaces with quasi-modular forms. arXiv:1202.2094 [math], April 2012. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia (2012)

  20. Shen, J., Yin, Q.: Topology of Lagrangian fibrations and Hodge theory of hyper-Kahler manifolds. arXiv:1812.10673 [math] (2019)

  21. Volpato, R.: On symmetries of \(\cal{N}=(4,4)\) sigma models on \(T^{4}\). J. High Energy Phys. 8, 2014 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoshioka, K.: Moduli spaces of stable sheaves on abelian surfaces. Mathematische Annalen 321(4), 817–884 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Yau, S.-T., Zaslow, E.: BPS states, string duality, and nodal curves on K3. Nucl. Phys. B 471(3), 503–512 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhan, S.: Counting rational curves on K3 surfaces with finite group actions. Int. Math. Res. Notices (rnaa320) (2021). arXiv:1907.03330

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my advisor Jim Bryan for his guidance and many helpful suggestions throughout this project, as well as the anonymous referee for their important feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Pietromonaco.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A. Modular forms and eta products

Appendix A. Modular forms and eta products

This appendix will be devoted to giving a brief overview of the modular objects relevant to our results. An excellent reference is Chapters 1 and 2 of [16]. We are interested in modular forms of integral or half-integral weight with multiplier system for the congruence subgroup

$$\begin{aligned}\Gamma _{0}(N) := \bigg \{ \begin{pmatrix} a &{} b \\ c &{} d \end{pmatrix} \in {\text {SL}}_{2}({\mathbb {Z}}) \, \bigg | \, c \equiv 0 \ (\mathrm {mod}\ N) \bigg \} \subset {\text {SL}}_{2}({\mathbb {Z}}) \end{aligned}$$

for an integer \(N \geqslant 1\). A multiplier system on \(\Gamma _{0}(N)\) is a function \(v : \Gamma _{0}(N) \rightarrow {\mathbb {C}}^{*}\) satisfying some consistency conditions. We will not need the details, so we refer the reader to [13, Sec.  2.6].

Let \({\mathfrak {H}}= \{ z \in {\mathbb {C}}\, | \, {\text {Im}}(z) > 0 \}\) be the upper-half plane in \({\mathbb {C}}\).

Definition A.1

A holomorphic function \(f: {\mathfrak {H}}\rightarrow {\mathbb {C}}\) is called a modular form of weight \(k \in \mathbb {R}\) and multiplier system v on \(\Gamma _{0}(N)\) if f is holomorphic at all cusps \(\mathbb {Q}\cup \{\infty \}\), and if for all \(L \in \Gamma _{0}(N)\), f transforms as

$$\begin{aligned} f(L \tau ) = f\bigg (\frac{a \tau + b}{c \tau + d}\bigg ) = v(L) (c \tau +d)^{k} f(\tau ), \,\,\,\,\,\,\, L= \begin{pmatrix} a &{} b \\ c &{} d \end{pmatrix}. \end{aligned}$$
(26)

We call f a cusp form if additionally, f vanishes at all cusps.

We employ the change of variables \(q = \exp (2 \pi i \tau )\) and with it, the abuse of notation writing \(f(\tau )\) and f(q) interchangeably. The fundamental building block of a large class of modular forms is the Dedekind eta function (or just eta function)

$$\begin{aligned} \eta (q) = q^{\frac{1}{24}} \prod _{n=1}^{\infty }(1-q^{n}), \end{aligned}$$

which is a modular form of weight \(\frac{1}{2}\) and multiplier system \(v_{\eta }\) on \({\text {SL}}_{2}({\mathbb {Z}})\); see [13, Sec.  2.8] where \(v_{\eta }\) is given explicitly.Footnote 9

Definition A.2

An eta product of level \(N \geqslant 1\) is a function \(f : {\mathfrak {H}}\rightarrow {\mathbb {C}}\) of the form

$$\begin{aligned} f(q) = \prod _{m|N} \eta (q^{m})^{a_{m}} \end{aligned}$$

such that \(a_{m} \in {\mathbb {Z}}\) (possibly negative, or zero) for all m|N, and where the product is over positive divisors of N.

From the modular properties of the Dedekind eta function, one can show that an eta product f of level N transforms as a modular form on \(\Gamma _{0}(N)\) of weight

$$\begin{aligned} k = \frac{1}{2} \sum _{m|N} a_{m} \in \tfrac{1}{2}{\mathbb {Z}}, \end{aligned}$$

and with multiplier system

$$\begin{aligned}v_{f}(L) = \prod _{m|N} \bigg (v_{\eta } \begin{pmatrix} a &{} mb \\ c/m &{} d \end{pmatrix}\bigg )^{a_{m}}, \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, L= \begin{pmatrix} a &{} b \\ c &{} d \end{pmatrix}. \end{aligned}$$

When we say “transforms as” we mean that f satisfies (26) for all \(L \in \Gamma _{0}(N)\). An eta product f is automatically holomorphic on \({\mathfrak {H}}\). This is because the form of \(\eta (q)\) indicates that any poles of f must occur at \(q=0\) or \(|q|=1\). All that is left to consider is when an eta product is holomorphic at the cusps. The following proposition gives necessary and sufficient conditions.

Proposition A.3

( [16, Cor.  2.3]). An eta product f of level N is holomorphic at the cusps if and only if the following holds for all positive divisors c of N

$$\begin{aligned} \sum _{m|N} \frac{(\gcd (c,m))^{2})}{m} a_{m} \geqslant 0. \end{aligned}$$

Moreover, f vanishes at all cusps if and only if each inequality is strict. An eta product is therefore a modular form of weight k for \(\Gamma _{0}(N)\) if and only if each inequality is satisfied, and it is a cusp form if and only if each is strictly satisfied.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pietromonaco, S. G-invariant Hilbert schemes on Abelian surfaces and enumerative geometry of the orbifold Kummer surface. Res Math Sci 9, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40687-021-00298-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40687-021-00298-9

Navigation