Advertisement

Kronecker’s first limit formula, revisited

  • W. Duke
  • Ö. Imamoḡlu
  • Á. Tóth
Research
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Modular Forms are Everywhere: Celebration of Don Zagier’s 65th Birthday

Abstract

We give some new applications of Kronecker’s first limit formula to real quadratic fields. In particular, we give a surprising geometrical relationship between the CM points associated with two imaginary quadratic fields with discriminants d and \(d^{\prime }\) and certain winding number functions coming from the closed geodesics associated with the real quadratic field of discriminant \(d^{\prime }d\).

Notes

Author's contributions

Acknowlegements

Duke and Tóth are grateful to FIM of ETH Zürich for its generous continued support of our joint research. Duke’s research on this paper was supported by NSF Grant DMS 1701638, the Simons Foundation and the Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach. Á. Tóth is supported by NKFIH (National Research, Development and Innovation Office) Grant ERC_HU_15 118946.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Asai, T., Kaneko, M., Ninomiya, H.: Zeros of certain modular functions and an application. Comment. Math. Univ. St. Paul 46(1), 93–101 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berger, A.: Sur une application des nombres des classes des formes quadratiques binaires pour un déterminant négatif. Nova Acta Soc. Sci. Upsaliensis 3(12), 29–31 (1883)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Birch, B.J.: Diophantine analysis and modular functions. In: 1969 Algebraic Geometry (International Colloqium, Tata Institute Fundamental Research, Bombay) pp. 35–42. Oxford University Press, London (1968)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Birch, B.J.: Heegner’s Proof. Arithmetic of L-Functions. IAS/Park City Mathematical Series, 18, pp. 281–291. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2011)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calegari, D.S.C.L.: MSJ Memoirs, 20. Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calegari, D., Louwsma, J.: Immersed surfaces in the modular orbifold. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 139, 2295–2308 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chowla, S., Selberg, A.: On Epstein’s zeta function (I). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 35, 371–374 (1949)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Selberg, A., Chowla, S.: On Epstein’s zeta-function. J. Reine Angew. Math. 227, 86–110 (1967)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen, H., Lenstra Jr., H.W.: Heuristics on Class Groups. Number theory (New York, 1982). Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1052, pp. 26–36. Springer, Berlin (1984)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deninger, C.: On the analogue of the formula of Chowla and Selberg for real quadratic fields. J. Reine Angew. Math. 351, 171–191 (1984)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deuring, M.F.: On Epstein’s zeta function. Ann. Math. (2) 38(3), 585–593 (1937)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deuring, M.: Imaginäre quadratische Zahlkörper mit der Klassenzahl Eins. Invent. Math. 5(3), 169–179 (1968)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D’Hoker, E., Phong, D.H.: On determinants of Laplacians on Riemann surfaces. Commun. Math Phys. 104, 537–545 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duke, W., Imamoḡlu, Ö., Tóth, Á.: Cycle integrals of the j-function and mock modular forms. Ann. Math. (2) 173(2), 947–981 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duke, W., Imamoḡlu, Ö., Tóth, Á.: Geometric invariants for real quadratic fields. Ann. Math. 184(2), 94–990 (2016)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Duke, W., Imamoḡlu, Ö., Tóth, Á.: Modular cocycles and linking numbers. Duke Math. J. 166(6), 1179–1210 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fay, John: Analytic torsion and Prym differentials. In: Riemann Surfaces and Related Topics: Proceedings of the 1978 Stony Brook Conference (State University New York, Stony Brook, NY, 1978), pp. 107–122. Annals in Mathematical Studies, 97. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1981)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghys, E.: Knots and Dynamics. International Congress of Mathematicians, vol. I, pp. 247–277. European Mathematical Society, Zürich (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rademacher, H., Grosswald, E.: Dedekind Sums, The Carus Mathematics Monographs, MAA (1972)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hammond, W.F., Hirzebruch, F.: L-series, modular imbeddings, and signatures. Math. Ann. 204, 263–270 (1973)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hecke, E.: Über die Kroneckersche Grenzformell für reelle quadratische Körper und die Klassenzhal relative-Abelscher Körper, Verhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Basel Bd. 28, S.363–372 = Werke 10, pp. 198–207 (1917)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hecke, E.: Bestimmung der Klassenzahl einer neuen Reihe von algebraischen Zahlkörpern, Nachrichten der K. Gesellschaft der Wissenschafter zu Göttingen. Mathematische-physikalische Klasse, S.1–23= Werke 15, pp. 290–312 (1921)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hecke, E.: Darstellung von Klassenzahl als Peioden von Integralen3. Gattung aus dem Gebiet der elliptischen Modulfunktionen, Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematichen Seminar der Hamburgischen Universität Bd. 4, 1925, S.211–223=Werke 21, pp. 405–417Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heegner, K.: Diophantische analysis und modulfunktionen. Math. Z. 56(3), 227–253 (1952)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. Herglotz, Über die Kroneckersche Grenzformel für reele, quadratische Körper. I, II, Leipziger Ber. 75 (1923), pp. 3–14 and pp. 31–37; Ges. Schriften, pp. 466–484Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hirzebruch, F.E.P.: Hilbert modular surfaces. Enseign. Math. (2) 19, 183–281 (1973)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hirzebruch, F., Zagier, D.: Classification of Hilbert modular surfaces. In: Complex Analysis and Algebraic Geometry, pp. 43–77. Collected Papers II. Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo (1977)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hurwitz, A.: Einige Eigenschaften der Dirichlet’schen Funktionen \(F(s)=\sum (D/n)1/(n^s)\), die bei der Bestimmung der Klassenanzahlen Binärer quadratischer Formen auftreten. Z. Math. Phys. 27, 86–101 (1882)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Katok, S.: Coding of closed geodesics after Gauss and Morse. Geom. Dedicata 63(2), 123–145 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kronecker, Werke IV Chelsea pp. 221–225 (1929)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lagarias, J.C., Rhoades, R.C.: Polyharmonic maass forms for \(\text{ PSL }(2,{{\mathbb{Z}}})\). Ramanujan J. 41(1–3), 191–232 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Landau, E.: Über die zu einem algebraischen Zahlkörper gehörige Zetafunction und die Ausdehnung der Tschebyschefschen Primzahltheorie auf das Problem der Verteilung der Primideale J. reine angew. Math. (Crelles J.) 125, 64–188 (1902). (Collected Works Vol. I, pp. 201–326)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lang, S.: Elliptic Functions. With an Appendix by J. Tate, 2nd edn. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 112. Springer, New York (1987)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lerch, M.: Sur quelques formules relatives du nombre des classes. Bull. Sci. Math. 21, 290–304 (1897)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Muzaffar, H., Williams, K.S.: A restricted Epstein zeta function and the evaluation of some definite integrals. Acta Arithm. 104(1), 23–66 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Meyer, C.: Die Berechnung der Klassenzahl Abelscher Körper über quadratischen Zahlkörpern. (German) Akademie-Verlag, Berlin (1957)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ramachandra, K.: Some applications of Kronecker’s limit formulas. Ann. Math. 2(80), 104–148 (1964)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ray, D.B., Singer, I.M.: Analytic torsion for complex manifolds. Ann. Math. 2(98), 154–177 (1973)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sarnak, P.: Special Values of Selberg’s Zeta-Function. Number Theory, Trace Formulas and Discrete Groups (Oslo, 1987), pp. 457–465. Academic Press, Boston, MA (1989)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sarnak, P.: Determinants of Laplacians; Heights and Finiteness. Analysis, et cetera, pp. 601–622. Academic Press, Boston, MA (1990)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sarnak, P.: Reciprocal Geodesics. In: Analytic Number Theory, Clay Math. Proceedings, 7, pp. 217–237. American Mathemaical Society, Providence, RI (2007)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shintani, T.: On a Kronecker limit formula for real quadratic fields. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 24(1), 167–199 (1977)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shintani, T.: A proof of the classical Kronecker limit formula. Tokyo J. Math. 3(2), 191–199 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Siegel, C.L.: Advanced Analytic Number Theory. Tata, Bombay (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Siegel, C.L.: Bernoullische Polynome und quadratische Zahlkörper, Collected Papers IV, pp. 9–40 (1968)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stark, H.M.: Class-number problems in quadratic fields. Actes du Congrés International des Mathématiciens (Nice, 1970), Tome 1, pp. 511–518. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1971)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Stark, H.M.: Values of L-functions at s=1. I. L-functions for quadratic forms. Adv. Math. 7, 301–343 (1971)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Stark, H.: The origin of the “Stark conjectures”. In: Arithmetic of L-Functions. IAS/Park City Mathematical Series, 18, pp. 33–44. Americal Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2011)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vlasenko, M., Zagier, D.: Higher Kronecker limit formulas for real quadratic fields. J. Reine Angew Math. 679, 23–64 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Weber, H.M.: Elliptische functionen und algebraische zahlen. Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig (1891)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Weber, H.M.: Lehrbuch der Algebra, vol. 3, 3rd edn. Chelsea, New York (1961)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Weil, A.: Elliptic Functions According to Eisenstein and Kronecker. Reprint of the 1976 original. Classics in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (1999)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Whittaker, E.T., Watson, G.N.: A Course of Modern Analysis. An Introduction to the General Theory of Infinite Processes and of Analytic Functions: With an Account of the Principal Transcendental Functions, 4th edn. Reprinted Cambridge University Press, New York (1962)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zagier, D.: A Kronecker limit formula for real quadratic fields. Math. Ann. 213, 153–184 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zagier, D.: Nombres de classes et fractions continues. J. Arithm. Bordeaux Astérisque 24–25, 81–97 (1975)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zagier, D.B.: Zetafunktionen und quadratische Körper (German) [Zeta functions and quadratic fields]. Eine Einführung in die höhere Zahlentheorie [An introduction to higher number theory]. Hochschultext [University Text]. Springer, Berlin (1981)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SpringerNature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics DepartmentUCLALos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Mathematics DepartmentETHZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Eotvos Lorand UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations