Skip to main content

Principle Component Analysis and Social Network Analysis for Decision Support of Ultra-Precision Machining

Abstract

Ultra-precision machining (UPM) technology is actively engaged in manufacturing high technological products nowadays. However, as its complicated machining mechanisms, the induced intricate relationships between various machining factors erect barriers in obtaining optimal machining conditions. The goal of this study is to use social network analysis (SNA) and principal component analysis (PCA) to combine the metrics of individual UPM factors and prioritize UPM factors based on their combined characteristics. In the beginning, the preliminary results of SNA approach act as the input to conduct PCA and generate principal components (PCs). The PCs were then combined into multiple characteristic performance indexes (MPCI), which have the balance characteristics of all main metrics from SNA, allowing to demonstrate the UPM factors with relatively high MPCI to be the dominant variables in optimizations. Few case studies have been provided for validation of the effectiveness of adjustments in UPM factors with high MPCI on the machining outcomes. The optimal machining conditions with multi-objectives could be effectively reached by executing the machining strategies with considering the prioritized UPM factors from the results of the hybrid SNA and PCA approach in this study. Overall, this study contributes to providing a comprehensive reference to academics and industry for prioritizing UPM factors with considering the balanced machining outcomes and developing practical machining strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Availability of Data and Material

provide upon the request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Schneider, F., Das, J., Kirsch, B., Linke, B., &Aurich, J. C. (2019). Sustainability in ultra precision and micro machining: a review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 1–10.

  2. Chen, B., Li, S., Deng, Z., Guo, B., & Zhao, Q. (2017). Grinding marks on ultra-precision grinding spherical and aspheric surfaces. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 4(4), 419–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, S., Li, Z., & Xiong, Z. (2019). A theoretical and experimental study of forced spindle vibration under unbalanced magnetic forces in ultra-precision machining. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 103(9), 4689–4694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao, X., Li, C., Chen, X., Cui, J., &Cao, B. (2021). Data-driven cutting parameters optimization method in multiple configurations machining process for energy consumption and production time saving. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 1–20.

  5. LaFé Perdomo, I., Quiza, R., Haeseldonckx, D., & Rivas, M. (2020). Sustainability-focused multi-objective optimization of a turning process. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 7(5), 1009–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, B., Tian, X., &Zhang, M. (2021). Modeling and multi-objective optimization method of machine tool energy consumption considering tool wear. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 1–15.

  7. Deb, K., & Datta, R. (2012). Hybrid evolutionary multi-objective optimization and analysis of machining operations. Engineering Optimization, 44(6), 685–706.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alvarado-Iniesta, A., Cuate, O., & Schütze, O. (2019). Multi-objective and many objective design of plastic injection molding process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 102(9), 3165–3180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deb, K., &Sundar, J. (2006). Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, 635–642.

  10. Jang, K., & Yang, K. (2001). Improving principal component analysis (PCA) in automotive body assembly using artificial neural networks. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 20(3), 188–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yip, W., To, S., & Wang, W. (2018). Design of an optical lens for LED lighting using a hybrid principal components analysis–Taguchi method. Lighting Research & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153518780512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sabio, N., Kostin, A., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., & Jiménez, L. (2012). Holistic minimization of the life cycle environmental impact of hydrogen infrastructures using multi-objective optimization and principal component analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(6), 5385–5405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Agarwal, S., Jacobs, D. R., Vaidya, D., Sibley, C. T., Jorgensen, N. W., Rotter, J. I., Chen, Y.-D. I., Liu, Y., Andrews, J. S., Kritchevsky, S., &others. (2012). Metabolic syndrome derived from principal component analysis and incident cardiovascular events: the multi ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA) and health, aging, and body composition (Health ABC). Cardiology Research and Practice, 2012.

  14. Alarcon-Rodriguez, A., Ault, G., & Galloway, S. (2010). Multi-objective planning of distributed energy resources: A review of the state-of-the-art. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(5), 1353–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Datta, S., Nandi, G., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2009). Application of entropy measurement technique in grey based Taguchi method for solution of correlated multiple response optimization problems: A case study in welding. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 28(2–3), 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, F.-C., & Chyu, C.-C. (2004). Optimization of correlated multiple quality characteristics robust design using principal component analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 23(2), 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pozo, C., Ruiz-Femenia, R., Caballero, J., Guillén-Gosálbez, G., & Jiménez, L. (2012). On the use of Principal Component Analysis for reducing the number of environmental objectives in multi-objective optimization: Application to the design of chemical supply chains. Chemical Engineering Science, 69(1), 146–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yip, W. S., To, S., & Zhou, H. (2020). Social network analysis for optimal machining conditions in ultra-precision manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 56, 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leung, C. S. K., &Lau, H. Y. K. (2019). A multi-objective simulation-based optimization approach applied to material handling system. In Innovative Computing Trends and Applications (pp. 1–12). Springer.

  20. Gusmerotti, N. M., Testa, F., Macellari, M., &Frey, M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility embeddedness through a social network analysis: The case of an Italian multiutility company. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

  21. Nieminen, U. J. (1973). On the centrality in a directed graph. Social Science Research, 2(4), 371–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Frenken, K. (2000). A complexity approach to innovation networks. The case of the aircraft industry (1909--1997). Research Policy, 29(2), 257–272.

  23. Hakimi, S. L. (1964). Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph. Operations Research, 12(3), 450–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (2006). A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Social Networks, 28(4), 466–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Spencer, J. W. (2003). Global gatekeeping, representation, and network structure: A longitudinal analysis of regional and global knowledge-diffusion networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(5), 428–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vamplew, P., Yearwood, J., Dazeley, R., &Berry, A. (2008). On the limitations of scalarisation for multi-objective reinforcement learning of pareto fronts. Australasian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 372–378.

  27. Gomes, J. H. F., Paiva, A. P., Costa, S. C., Balestrassi, P. P., & Paiva, E. J. (2013). Weighted multivariate mean square error for processes optimization: A case study on flux-cored arc welding for stainless steel claddings. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 522–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peruchi, R. S., Balestrassi, P. P., dePaiva, A. P., Ferreira, J. R., & deSantana Carmelossi, M. (2013). A new multivariate gage R&R method for correlated characteristics. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(1), 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yip, W. S., & To, S. (2017). Reduction of material swelling and recovery of titanium alloys in diamond cutting by magnetic field assistance. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yip, W. S., To, S., & Sun, Z. (2021). Hybrid ultrasonic vibration and magnetic field assisted diamond cutting of titanium alloys. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 62, 743–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yip, W. S., & To, S. (2020). Sustainable ultra-precision machining of titanium alloy using intermittent cutting. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 7(2), 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yip, W. S., & To, S. (2020). Energy consumption modeling of ultra-precision machining and the experimental validation. Energy, 196, 117018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zareena, A. R., & Veldhuis, S. C. (2012). Tool wear mechanisms and tool life enhancement in ultra-precision machining of titanium. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 212(3), 560–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, S. J., To, S., & Zhang, G. Q. (2017). Diamond tool wear in ultra-precision machining. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 88(1–4), 613–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8751-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pramanik, A., Neo, K. S., Rahman, M., Li, X. P., Sawa, M., & Maeda, Y. (2003). Cutting performance of diamond tools during ultra-precision turning of electroless-nickel plated die materials. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 140(1–3), 308–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yan, J., Syoji, K., & Tamaki, J. (2003). Some observations on the wear of diamond tools in ultra-precision cutting of single-crystal silicon. Wear, 255(7–12), 1380–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, S. J., To, S., Wang, S. J., & Zhu, Z. W. (2015). A review of surface roughness generation in ultra-precision machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 91, 76–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yip, W. S., & To, S. (2017). Tool life enhancement in dry diamond turning of titanium alloys using an eddy current damping and a magnetic field for sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rahman, M. A., Rahman, M., &Kumar, A. S. (2017). Modelling of flow stress by correlating the material grain size and chip thickness in ultra-precision machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 123, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.08.001

  40. Lee, W., Kim, S. H., Park, J., & Min, B.-K. (2017). Simulation-based machining condition optimization for machine tool energy consumption reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 352–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yip, W. S., & To, S. (2019). Reduction of minimum cutting thickness of titanium alloys in micro cutting by a magnetic field assistance. IEEE Access, 7, 152034–152041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ge, Y. F., Xu, J. H., Yang, H., Luo, S. B., & Fu, Y. C. (2008). Workpiece surface quality when ultra-precision turning of SiCp/Al composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 203(1–3), 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Liew, W. Y. H., Ngoi, B. K. A., & Lu, Y. G. (2003). Wear characteristics of PCBN tools in the ultra-precision machining of stainless steel at low speeds. Wear, 254(3–4), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work described in this paper was mainly supported by the funding support to the State Key Laboratories in Hong Kong from the Innovation and Technology Commission (ITC) of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR), China. The authors would also like to express their sincere thanks for the financial support from the Research Office (Project code: BBXM and BBX) of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

W.S. Yip: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing—review & editing. S. To: Supervision, Conceptualization, Resources, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suet To.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yip, W.S., To, S. Principle Component Analysis and Social Network Analysis for Decision Support of Ultra-Precision Machining. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-022-00451-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-022-00451-x

Keywords

  • Ultra-precision machining
  • Social network analysis
  • Principal component analysis
  • Optimization
  • Decision support