Skip to main content

Analysis and Optimization of Energy Consumption for Multi-part Printing Using Selective Laser Melting and Considering the Support Structure


Selective laser melting (SLM) can form complex and precise metal parts simultaneously and is widely used in medical and aerospace fields. The support structure plays an important role in SLM process, including supporting the overhanging structure, dissipating heat, and minimizing geometric deformation caused by internal stress. However, a non-optimal support structure causes increased energy and material consumption during processing and must be removed afterward to allow for utilization of the parts. Existing support structure design methods only consider reducing the support of a single part, and research on the support and energy consumption of simultaneous multi-part printing is lacking. Therefore, to reduce the energy and material consumption of simultaneous multi-part printing by SLM and improve processing efficiency, an energy consumption analysis and optimization method is proposed in this study from the perspective of the support structure. Based on previous studies on energy consumption distribution of the additive manufacturing process, a multi-component SLM energy consumption and material consumption model was established. Furthermore, a shared-support optimization strategy for simultaneous multi-part processing is proposed. For optimization, the method selects the appropriate printing direction of one part, and then combines multiple parts to form a shared support structure to minimize energy consumption. Finally, under the constraint of minimizing the mass, an optimization strategy of the SLM multi-part shared support combination is established, and the purpose of reducing the energy consumption and material consumption of the SLM is achieved under the premise of ensuring the geometric accuracy of the parts. The method was applied to the manufacturing process of a group of parts with a beam structure. Compared with the printing method using independent support, the shared support structure method reduced energy consumption more than 5.5%, material consumption for the support structure more than 17.2%, and printing time to a certain extent. This method effectively improves SLM production efficiency and sustainability and provides strategic support for additive manufacturing designers and producers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


  1. Lee, H., Lim, C. H. J., Low, M. J., Tham, N., Murukeshan, V. M., & Kim, Y. J. (2017). Lasers in additive manufacturing: A review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 4(3), 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cai, C., Wu, X., Liu, W., Zhu, W., Chen, H., Qiu, J. C. D., Sun, C.-N., Liu, J., Wei, Q., & Shi, Y. (2020). Selective laser melting of near-α titanium alloy Ti-6Al-2Zr-1Mo-1V: Parameter optimization, heat treatment and mechanical performance. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 57, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn, D.-G. (2016). Direct metal additive manufacturing processes and their sustainable applications for green technology: A review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 3(4), 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elsayed, M., Ghazy, M., Youssef, Y., & Essa, K. (2019). Optimization of SLM process parameters for Ti6Al4V medical implants. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 25(3), 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sabouri, A., Yetisen, A. K., Sadigzade, R., Hassanin, H., Essa, K., & Butt, H. (2017). Three-dimensional microstructured lattices for oil sensing. Energy & Fuels, 31(3), 2524–2529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, J., Wang, Y., & Shi, J. (2021). A novel time step fusion method with finite volume formulation for accelerated thermal analysis of laser additive manufacturing. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 8(4), 1181–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fiocchi, J., Biffi, C. A., Scaccabarozzi, D., Saggin, B., & Tuissi, A. (2020). Enhancement of the damping behavior of Ti6Al4V alloy through the use of trabecular structure produced by selective laser melting. Advanced Engineering Materials, 22(2), 1900722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, L., Li, E., Shen, H., Zou, R., Yu, A., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Adhesion effects on spreading of metal powders in selective laser melting. Powder Technology, 363, 602–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zou, S., Xiao, H., Ye, F., Li, Z., Tang, W., Zhu, F., Chen, C., & Zhu, C. (2020). Numerical analysis of the effect of the scan strategy on the residual stress in the multi-laser selective laser melting. Results in Physics, 16, 103005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, M., Li, L., Wang, Q., Ma, Z., Li, X., & Liu, Z. (2021). Integration of additive manufacturing in casting: Advances, challenges, and prospects. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 9, 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, C., & Qian, X. (2020). Simultaneous optimization of build orientation and topology for additive manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing, 34(3), 101246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vo, T. Q., & Kim, B. H. (2017). Molecular dynamics study of thermodynamic properties of nanoclusters for additive manufacturing. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 4(3), 301–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Allaire, G., Bihr, M., & Bogosel, B. (2020). Support optimization in additive manufacturing for geometric and thermo-mechanical constraints. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 61(6), 2377–2399.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng, L., & To, A. (2019). Part-scale build orientation optimization for minimizing residual stress and support volume for metal additive manufacturing: Theory and experimental validation. Computer-Aided Design, 113, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Das, P., Mhapsekar, K., Chowdhury, S., Samant, R., & Anand, S. (2017). Selection of build orientation for optimal support structures and minimum part errors in additive manufacturing. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 14(sup1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fritz, K., & Kim, I. Y. (2020). Simultaneous topology and build orientation optimization for minimization of additive manufacturing cost and time. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 121(15), 3442–3481.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuo, Y.-H., Cheng, C.-C., Lin, Y.-S., & San, C.-H. (2018). Support structure design in additive manufacturing based on topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 57(1), 183–195.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang, J., Stringer, J., & Xu, X. (2019). Support optimization for flat features via path planning in additive manufacturing. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 6(3), 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu, L., Feng, R., Xi, J., Li, P., & Wei, X. (2020). A lightweight design of tree-shaped support structures for SLM additive manufacturing. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 17, 716–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabiston, G., & Kim, I. Y. (2020). 3D topology optimization for cost and time minimization in additive manufacturing. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 61(2), 731–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Gomes, S., & Bernard, A. (2020). Bio-inspired generative design for support structure generation and optimization in Additive Manufacturing (AM). CIRP Annals, 69(1), 117–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma, Z., Gao, M., Wang, Q., Wang, N., Li, L., Liu, C., & Liu, Z. (2021). Energy consumption distribution and optimization of additive manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 116(11–12), 3377–3390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ma, F., Zhang, H., Hon, K. K. B., & Gong, Q. (2018). An optimization approach of selective laser sintering considering energy consumption and material cost. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 529–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matos, M. A., Rocha, A. M. A., Costa, L. A., & Pereira, A. I. (2019). A multi-objective approach to solve the build orientation problem in additive manufacturing. In International conference on computational science and its applications (pp. 261–276). Springer.

  25. Matos, M. A., Rocha, A. M. A., & Pereira, A. I. (2020). Improving additive manufacturing performance by build orientation optimization. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 107(5–6), 1993–2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, Y., Harik, R., Fadel, G., & Bernard, A. (2019). A statistical method for build orientation determination in additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 25(1), 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Das, P., Chandran, R., Samant, R., & Anand, S. (2015). Optimum part build orientation in additive manufacturing for minimizing part errors and support structures. Procedia Manufacturing, 1, 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Griffiths, V., Scanlan, J. P., Eres, M. H., Martinez-Sykora, A., & Chinchapatnam, P. (2019). Cost-driven build orientation and bin packing of parts in Selective Laser Melting (SLM). European Journal of Operational Research, 273(1), 334–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51775162, 52005146), National Social Science Foundation of China (20BGL108), Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2008085QE265, 2008085QE232, 2008085ME150), Demonstration experiment training Center of Suzhou University (szxy2020sfzx02), Domestic Visiting and Study Program for outstanding Young Backbone talents in Colleges and universities (gxgnfx2021151), The Research Platform of Anhui Provincial Engineering Laboratory on Information Fusion and Control of Intelligent Robot under grants (IFCIR2020005), and Opening Project of Suzhou University Research Platform (2020ykf11, 2020ykf12, 2020ykf13). Their financial contributions are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ZM wrote the manuscript. MG and LL contributed to the conception of the study and revised the manuscript. QW performed the experiments. KG performed the data analyses. GZ and CL contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation. ZL helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mengdi Gao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Z., Gao, M., Guo, K. et al. Analysis and Optimization of Energy Consumption for Multi-part Printing Using Selective Laser Melting and Considering the Support Structure. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Selective laser melting
  • Multi-part printing
  • Energy consumption
  • Support optimization