Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maintaining Sustainability in Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems Featuring Green-BOM

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dynamic and unpredictable market changes have brought more challenges to manufacturers. Manufacturers are required to design their production process with the ability not only to meet changing customer demands dynamically, but also to produce quality products at low cost and to stay sustainable by decreasing the emission and energy consumption. The reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) appeared as a promising solution to cope with rapidly changing market demands. The RMS has the ability to satisfy the demand by quickly adapting (removing, adding, adjusting, changing) parts, which highly consider the set of machines, as known as reconfiguration in RMS. The RMS also has the capability to increase companies profit by optimizing its reconfiguration process where product family formation is crucial. However, in sustainability, three main parts need to be satisfied, which are social, economic, and environmental. The RMS is still lack in the environmental area. In order to increase the sustainability of RMS, Green Bill of Material (Green-BOM) is used as a supporting tool to maintain the eco-friendliness of each part/product. In this paper, product family formation is introduced to represent the main problem of reconfiguration process, and Green-BOM is introduced to maintain the sustainability within RMS. However, there is still lack of discussion or researches regarding sustainability within RMS. Therefore, a systematic approach is discussed by featuring Green Bill of Material (Green-BOM) to maintain sustainability within products and during product family formation

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koren, Y. (2010). The global manufacturing revolution product-process-business integration and reconfigurable systems. Amsterdam: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehrabi, M., Ulsoy, A. G., & Koren, Y. (2002). Trends and Perspectives in Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,13(2), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koren, Y., & Ulsoy, A. G. (2002). Vision, principles and impact of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Journal of Powertrain International,5, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koren, Y., Heisel, U., & Jovane, F. (1998). Reconfigurable manufacturing system. Annals of CIRP,48(2), 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maier-Speredelozzi, V., Koren, Y., & Hu, S. J. (2003). Convertibility measures for manufacturing systems. Annals of CIRP,52(1), 367–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heisel, U. & Meitzner, M. (2001). RMS -opportunities and challenges. In: Proceedings of CIRP 1st International Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor (CD-ROM).

  7. Hauschild, M., Jeswiet, J., & Alting, L. (2005). From life cycle assessment to sustainable production: status and perspectives. Annals of CIRP,54(2), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryu, K. (2010). Green product and production information management in the fractal manufacturing system. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Prod. Res. (ICPR21), Stuttgart, Germany, p 1–6.

  9. Leahu, S. (2011). Sustainable manufacturing—an overview for manufacturing engineers, sustainable manufacturing consulting. https://sustainablemanufacturing.biz/. Accessed 30 Nov 2011.

  10. Brent, A.C. & Labuschagne, C. (2004). Sustainable life cycle management: indicators to assess the sustainability of engineering projects and technologies. In IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, Singapore.

  11. Azab, A., ElMaraghy, H. A., Nyhuis, P., Pachow-Frauenhofer, J., & Schmidt, M. (2013). Mechanics of change: A framework to reconfigure manufacturing systems. CIRP-JMST,6(2), 110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Löffler, C., Westkämper, E., and Unger, K. (2012). Changeability in structure planning of automotive manufacturing. In: Proceedings International ICMS 2012, Vol. 3, pp. 167–172.

  13. Karl, F., Reinhart, G., & Zäh, M. F. (2012). Strategic planning of reconfigurations on manufacturing resources. Procedia CIRP,3, 608–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mesa, J. A., Esparragoza, I., & Maury, H. (2019). Trends and perspectives of sustainable product design for open architecture products: Facing the circular economy model. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology,6(2), 377–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meng, Q., Li, F., Zhou, L., Li, J., Ji, Q., & Yang, X. (2015). A rapid life cycle assessment method based on green features in supporting conceptual design. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology,2(2), 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hermann, C., Schmidt, C., Kurle, D., Blume, S., & Thiede, S. (2014). Sustainability in manufacturing and factories of the future. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology,1(4), 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahn, S. (2014). An evaluation of green manufacturing technologies based on research databases. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology,1(1), 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jo, H., Noh, S. D., & Cho, Y. (2014). An agile operations management system for green factory. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology,1(2), 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mastura, M. T., Sapuan, S. M., Mansor, M. R., & Nuraini, A. A. (2018). Materials selection of thermoplastic matrices for ‘green’ natural fibre composites for automotive anti-roll bar with particular emphasis on the environment. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology,5(1), 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, J., Shim, B. S., Kim, H. S., Lee, Y., Min, S., Jang, D., et al. (2015). Review of nanocellulose for sustainable future materials. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology,2(2), 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koren, Y. (2006). General RMS characteristics. Comparison with dedicated and flexible systems. In A. I. Dashchenko (Ed.), Reconfigurable manufacturing systems and transformable factories (pp. 27–46). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Koren, Y., Jovane, F., & Heisel, U. (1999). Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. A keynote paper. Annals of CIRP,48(2), 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Koren, Y., & Moshe, S. (2010). Technical paper: Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing System,29, 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gershenson, J. K., Prasad, G. J., & Zhang, Y. (2003). Product modularity: Definitions and benefits. Journal of Engineering design,14(3), 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Srinivasan, G., Narendran, T. T., & Mahadevan, B. (1987). An assignment model for the part-family problem in group technology. International Journal of Production Research,28, 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dasari, R. V., & Moon, Y. B. (1997). Analysis of part family for group technology applications using decision trees. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,13, 116–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. He, D., & Babayan, A. (2002). Scheduling manufacturing systems for delayed product differentiation in agile manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research,40(11), 2461–2481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tu, Q., Vonderembse, A., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. (2004). Measuring modularity-based manufacturing practices and their impact on mass customization capability: A customer-driven perspective. Decision Science,35(20), 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kusiak, A. (1987). The generalized group technology concept. International Journal of Production Research,25, 561–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Galan, R., Racero, J., Eguia, I., & Garcia, J. M. (1997). A systematic approach for part family formation in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing,23, 489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rajamani, S., & Rajamani, D. (1996). Cellular manufacturing systems: design, planning and control. Suffolk: Chapman & Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Hajkowicz, S. A., McDonald, G. T., & Smith, P. N. (2000). An evaluation of multiple objective decision support weighting techniques in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,43(4), 505–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2016R1A2B4014898).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwangyeol Ryu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurniadi, K.A., Ryu, K. Maintaining Sustainability in Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems Featuring Green-BOM. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 7, 755–767 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00215-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00215-5

Keywords

Navigation