Skip to main content
Log in

Fabrication of Enzymatic Biofuel Cell with Electrodes on Both Sides of Microfluidic Channel

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 24 May 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Enzymatic biofuel cells (EBFCs) that utilize glucose as fuel in a human body to produce electricity are being explored as promising alternatives to power implantable devices. However, some limitations need to be overcome to render such micro-electronic devices practically applicable. Here, we propose a microfluidic EBFC architecture with electrodes on both sides of the microchannel and its fabrication via stencil method. Multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) electrodes are fabricated on both sides of a Y-shaped microfluidic channel to reduce the effect of the depletion boundary layer and cross-diffusional mixing of the fuel and oxidant, which are functions of the distance from the microchannel inlet. Therefore, the microchannel length is reduced by half, while maintaining the same MWCNT electrode area. The microchannel is produced by polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) casting whereas the electrodes are fabricated by a PDMS stencil, using MWCNT patterned on etched indium tin oxide glass. The electrodes are modified with glucose oxidase and laccase via direct covalent bonding. The cell performance is studied at different microchannel heights and flow rates, obtaining a maximum power and current density of 153 µW cm−2 and 450 µA cm−2, respectively, at a microchannel height of 450 µm and flow rate of 25 mL h−1. The double-layer EBFC shows a 23% improvement in the performance compared to a single-layer EBFC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 24 May 2019

    The original version of this article unfortunately contains a mistake. The acknowledgement section of the above article is incorrect. The correct acknowledgements are as follows:

References

  1. Moehlenbrock, M. J., & Minteer, S. D. (2008). Extended lifetime biofuel cells. Chemical Society Reviews, 37(6), 1188–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shukla, A. K., et al. (2004). Biological fuel cells and their applications. Current Science, 87(4), 455–468.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bullen, R. A., et al. (2006). Biofuel cells and their development. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 21(11), 2015–2045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yahiro, A. T., Lee, S. M., & Kimble, D. O. (1964). Bioelectrochemistry: I. Enzyme utilizing bio-fuel cell studies. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) Specialized Section on Biophysical Subjects, 88(2), 375–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bockris, J., & Srinivasan, S. (1969). Fuel cells: Their electrochemistry. McGraw-Hill, NewYork.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Govil, G., & Saran, A. (1982). Biochemical fuel cells. Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 59,1226–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Palmore, G., & Whitesides, G. M. (1994). Microbial and enzymatic biofuel cells. ACS Symposium Series, 566, 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Halámková, L., et al. (2012). Implanted biofuel cell operating in a living snail. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 134(11), 5040–5043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vielstich, W., Yokokawa, H., & Gasteiger, H. A. (2009). Handbook of fuel cells: Fundamentals technology and applications. John Wiley: New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mohiuddin, M., et al. (2015). Transparent and flexible haptic actuator based on cellulose acetate stacked membranes. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 16(7), 1479–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, H. J., Seo, K. J., & Kim, D. E. (2016). Investigation of mechanical behavior of single-and multi-layer graphene by using molecular dynamics simulation. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 17(12), 1693–1701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, J., & Yang, G. (2006). Nanohole fabrication using FIB, EB and AFM for biomedical applications. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 7(4), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, J., Jia, H., & Wang, P. (2006). Challenges in biocatalysis for enzyme-based biofuel cells. Biotechnology advances, 24(3), 296–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shin, Y. C., Novin, E., & Kim, H. (2015). Electrical and thermal conductivities of carbon fiber composites with high concentrations of carbon nanotubes. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 16(3), 465–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bae, K. M., et al. (2015). Thermobattery based on CNT coated carbon textile and thermoelectric electrolyte. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 16(7), 1245–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Suh, Y. D., et al. (2016). Selective electro—thermal growth of zinc oxide nanowire on photolithographically patterned electrode for microsensor applications. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Green Technology, 3(2), 173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rincon, R. A., et al. (2011). Enzymatic fuel cells: Integrating flow-through anode and air-breathing cathode into a membrane-less biofuel cell design. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 27(1), 132–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zebda, A., et al. (2009). Electrochemical performance of a glucose/oxygen microfluidic biofuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 193(2), 602–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choban, E. R., et al. (2004). Microfluidic fuel cell based on laminar flow. Journal of Power Sources, 128(1), 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Amatore, C., et al. (2007). Theory and experiments of transport at channel microband electrodes under laminar flows. 1. Steady-state regimes at a single electrode. Analytical chemistry, 79(22), 8502–8510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, F., Chang, M. H., & Lin, M. K. (2007). Analysis of membraneless formic acid microfuel cell using a planar microchannel. Electrochimica acta, 52(7), 2506–2514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Choban, E. R., Waszczuk, P., & Kenis, P. J. A. (2005). Characterization of limiting factors in laminar flow-based membraneless microfuel cells. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 8(7), A348–A352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zebda, A., et al. (2011). Enzyme-based microfluidic biofuel cell to generate micropower. Enzyme, 2, O2.

  24. Zebda, A., et al. (2010). Membraneless microchannel glucose biofuel cell with improved electrical performances. Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, 149(1), 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. T. D., Dang, T. D., et al. (2011). A novel simple preparation method of a hydrogel mold for PDMS micro-fluidic device fabrication. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 22(1), 015017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi, J. H., et al. (2012). Micropatterning of neural stem cells and Purkinje neurons using a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stencil. Lab on a Chip, 12(23), 5045–5050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Beneyton, T., et al. (2013). Membraneless glucose/O2 microfluidic biofuel cells using covalently bound enzymes. Chemical Communications, 49(11), 1094–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Farneth, W. E., & D’Amore, M. B., (2005). Encapsulated laccase electrodes for fuel cell cathodes. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 581(2), 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bedekar, A. S., et al. (2007). Oxygen limitation in microfluidic biofuel cells. Chemical Engineering Communications, 195(3), 256–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferrigno, R., et al. (2002). Membraneless vanadium redox fuel cell using laminar flow. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 124(44), 12930–12931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. González-Guerrero, M. J., et al. (2013). Membraneless glucose/O2 microfluidic enzymatic biofuel cell using pyrolyzed photoresist film electrodes. Lab on a Chip, 13(15), 2972–2979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Brunel, L., et al. (2007). Oxygen transport through laccase biocathodes for a membrane-less glucose/O2 biofuel cell. Electrochemistry Communications, 9(2), 331–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tamaki, T., & Yamaguchi, T. (2006). High-surface-area three-dimensional biofuel cell electrode using redox-polymer-grafted carbon. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 45(9), 3050–3058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant (NRF-2017R1A2B4004966 and NRF-2012K1A3A1A19038448) funded by the Korean Government (KMEST).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyu Man Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, H., Kim, C.M., Kim, S.Y. et al. Fabrication of Enzymatic Biofuel Cell with Electrodes on Both Sides of Microfluidic Channel. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 6, 511–520 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00056-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00056-x

Keywords

Navigation