Advertisement

Modal Data Processing for High Resolution Deflectometry

  • Maham Aftab
  • James H. Burge
  • Greg A. Smith
  • Logan Graves
  • Chang-jin Oh
  • Dae Wook KimEmail author
Regular Paper
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we present a modal data processing methodology, for reconstructing high resolution surfaces from measured slope data, over rectangular apertures. One of the primary goals is the ability to effectively reconstruct deflectometry measurement data for high resolution and freeform surfaces, such as telescope mirrors. We start by developing a gradient polynomial basis set which can quickly generate a very high number of polynomial terms. This vector basis set, called the G polynomials set, is based on gradients of the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind. The proposed polynomials represent vector fields that are defined as the gradients of scalar functions. This method yields reconstructions that fit the measured data more closely than those obtained using conventional methods, especially in the presence of defects in the mirror surface and physical blockers/markers such as fiducials used during deflectometry measurements. We demonstrate the strengths of our method using simulations and real metrology data from the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST) primary mirror.

Keywords

Surface measurements, numerical approximation and analysis Instrumentation, measurement, and metrology Information processing Deflectometry Testing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This material is partly based on work performed for the DKIST. DKIST is managed by the National Solar Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy Inc. under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. Also, it is based in part upon work performed for the “Post-processing of Freeform Optics” project supported by the Korea Basic Science Institute. The deflectometry related software development is partially funded by the II–VI Foundation Block grant.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    18.3 Definitions. DLMF: 18.3 definitions. N.p., n.d. Web. Retrieved July 25, 2017 from http://dlmf.nist.gov/18.3.
  2. 2.
    Daniel K. Inouye solar telescope. N.p., n.d. Web. Retrieved July 31, 2017 from http://dkist.nso.edu/.
  3. 3.
    Chung, S., Song, S. E., & Cho, Y. T. (2017). Effective software solutions for 4D printing: A review and proposal. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing., 4, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Els, S., Lock, T., Comoretto, G., Gracia, G., O’Mullane, W., Cheek, N., et al. (2014). The commissioning of Gaia. Proceedings of SPIE, 9150, 91500A.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fox, L., & Parker, J. B. (1968). Approximation. Minimax and least-squares theories. Chebyshev polynomials in numerical analysis (pp. 1–17). London: Oxford U Pr.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2014). Large-scale dimensional metrology (LSDM): From tapes and theodolites to multi-sensor systems. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 15, 1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jüptner, W., & Bothe, T. (2009). Sub-nanometer resolution for the inspection of reflective surfaces using white light. Proceedings of SPIE, 7405, 740502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, B. C. (2015). Development of aspheric surface profilometry using curvature method. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 16, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, D. W., Aftab, M., Choi, H., Graves, L., & Trumper, I. (2016). Optical metrology systems spanning the full spatial frequency spectrum, FW5G.4. Washington: Optical Society of America.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, D. W., Su, P., Oh, C. J., and Burge, J. H., Extremely large freeform optics manufacturing and testing, In 2015 Conference on lasers and electro-optics pacific rim, (Optical Society of America, 2015), paper 26F1_1.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, D., Su, T., Su, P., Oh, C., Graves, L., & Burge, J. (2015). Accurate and rapid IR metrology for the manufacture of freeform optics. SPIE Newsroom.  https://doi.org/10.1117/2.1201506.006015.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knauer, M. C., Kaminski, J., & Hausler, G. (2004). Phase measuring deflectometry: A new approach to measure specular free-form surfaces. Proceedings of SPIE, 5457, 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, M., Li, D., Jin, C., Yuan, X., Xiong, Z., & Wang, Q. (2017). Improved zonal integration method for high accurate surface reconstruction in quantitative deflectometry. Applied Optics, 56, F144–F151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, M., Li, D., Zhang, C., Wang, Q., & Chen, H. (2015). Modal wavefront reconstruction from slope measurements for rectangular apertures. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 32, 1916–1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, F., Robinson, B. M., Reardon, P. J., & Geary, J. M. (2001). Analyzing optics test data on rectangular apertures using 2-D Chebyshev polynomials. Optical Engineering, 50(4), 043609–043618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mahajan, V. N. (2010). Orthonormal aberration polynomials for anamorphic optical imaging systems with rectangular pupils. Applied Optics, 49, 6924–6929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mahajan, V. N. (2013). Optical imaging and aberrations, Part III: Wavefront analysis . Bellingham: SPIE Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mason, J. C., & Christopher, D. (2003). Handscomb. Chebyshev polynomials. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oh, C., Lowman, A. E., Smith, G. A., Su, P., Huang, R., Su, T., et al. (2016). Fabrication and testing of 4.2 m off-axis aspheric primary mirror of Daniel K. Inouye solar telescope. Proceedings of SPIE Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation II, 9912, 99120O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Polidan, R. S., Breckinridge, J. B., Lillie, C. F., MacEwen, H. A., Flannery, M. R., Dailey, D. R., et al. (2015). An evolvable space telescope for future astronomical missions 2015 update. Proceedings of SPIE, 9602, 960207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Primot, J., Rousset, G., & Fontanella, J. C. (1990). Deconvolution from wave-front sensing: A new technique for compensating turbulence-degraded images. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. Optics and Image Science, 7, 1598–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rivlin, T. J. (1974). The Chebyshev polynomials. New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith, G. A., Lewis, B. J., Palmer, M., Kim, D. K., Loeff, A. R., & Burge, J. H. (2012). Open source data analysis and visualization software for optical engineering. Proceedings of SPIE, 8487, 84870F.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Southwell, W. H. (1980). Wave-front estimation from wave-front slope measurements. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 70, 998–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Su, T. (2014). Asphercial metrology for non-specular surfaces with the scanning long-wave optical test system . Tucson: University of Arizona (Academic).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Su, P., Khreishi, M. H., Su, T., Huang, R., Dominguez, M. Z., Maldonado, A., et al. (2013). Aspheric and freeform surfaces metrology with software configurable optical test system: A computerized reverse Hartmann test. Optical Engineering, 53(3), 031305–031316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Su, T., Park, W. H., Parks, R. E., Su, P., & Burge, J. H. (2011). Scanning long-wave optical test system: A new ground optical surface slope test system. Proceedings of SPIE, 8126, 81260E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Su, P., Parks, R. E., Wang, L., Angel, R. P., & Burge, J. H. (2010). Software configurable optical test system: a computerized reverse Hartmann test. Applied Optics, 49, 4404–4412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Su, P., Wang, Y., Burge, J., Kaznatcheev, K., & Idir, M. (2012). Non-null full field X-ray mirror metrology using SCOTS: A reflection deflectometry approach. Optics Express, 20, 12393–12406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Su, T., Wang, S., Parks, R. E., Su, P., & Burge, J. H. (2013). Measuring rough optical surfaces using scanning long-wave optical test system. 1. Principle and implementation. Applied Optics, 52, 7117–7126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tan, G., Zhang, L., Liu, S., & Zhang, W. (2015). A fast and differentiated localization method for complex surfaces inspection. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 16, 2631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tang, Y., Su, X., Liu, Y., & Jing, H. (2008). 3D shape measurement of the aspheric mirror by advanced phase measuring deflectometry. Optics Express, 16, 15090–15096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhao, C., & Burge, J. H. (2007). Orthonormal vector polynomials in a unit circle, part I: Basis set derived from gradients of Zernike polynomials. Optics Express, 15, 18014–18024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhao, C., & Burge, J. H. (2008). Orthonormal vector polynomials in a unit circle, part II: Completing the basis set. Optics Express, 16, 6586–6591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zwillinger, D. (2003). Special functions. CRC standard mathematical tables and formulae (31st ed., pp. 532–538). Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Optical SciencesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Steward Observatory, University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations