Skip to main content

Smart Machining Process Using Machine Learning: A Review and Perspective on Machining Industry

Abstract

The Fourth Industrial Revolution incorporates the digital revolution into the physical world, creating a new direction in a number of fields, including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, nanotechnology, biotechnology, robotics, 3D printing, autonomous vehicles, and the Internet of Things. The artificial intelligence field has encountered a turning point mainly due to advancements in machine learning, which allows machines to learn, improve, and perform a specific task through data without being explicitly programmed. Machine learning can be utilized with machining processes to improve product quality levels and productivity rates, to monitor the health of systems, and to optimize design and process parameters. This is known as smart machining, referring to a new machining paradigm in which machine tools are fully connected through a cyber-physical system. This paper reviews and summarizes machining processes using machine learning algorithms and suggests a perspective on the machining industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Shrouf, F., Ordieres, J., and Miragliotta, G., “Smart Factories in Industry 4.0: A Review of the Concept and of Energy Management Approached in Production Based on the Internet of Things Paradigm,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 697–701, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yan, J., Meng, Y., Lu, L., and Guo, C., “Big-Data-Driven Based Intelligent Prognostics Scheme in Industry 4.0 Environment,” Proc. of Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHMHarbin), pp. 1–5, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Coulter, R. and Pan, L., “Intelligent Agents Defending for an IoT World: A Review,” Computers & Security, Vol. 73, pp. 439–458, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    TrendForce, “TrendForce Forecasts Size of Global Market for Smart Manufacturing Solutions to Top US$320 Billion by 2020; Product Development Favors Integrated Solutions,” https://doi.org/press.trendforce.com/press/20170731-2911.html (Accessed 8 AUG 2018)

  5. 5.

    Antony, P., Jnanesh, N., and Prajna, M., “Machine Learning Models for Material Selection: Framework for Predicting Flatwise Compressive Strength Using Ann,” Proc. of 2nd International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Computing and Communication Technology (iCATccT), pp. 424–427, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kang, H. S., Lee, J. Y., Choi, S., Kim, H., Park, J. H., et al., “Smart Manufacturing: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 111–128, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Beier, G., Niehoff, S., Ziems, T., and Xue, B., “Sustainability Aspects of a Digitalized Industry-A Comparative Study from China and Germany,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 227–234, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Arisoy, Y. M. and Özel, T., “Machine Learning Based Predictive Modeling of Machining Induced Microhardness and Grain Size in Ti-6Al-4V Alloy,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 425–433, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wen, L., Li, X., Gao, L., and Zhang, Y., “A New Convolutional Neural Network-Based Data-Driven Fault Diagnosis Method,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 65, No. 7, pp. 5990–5998, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Benkedjouh, T., Medjaher, K., Zerhouni, N., and Rechak, S., “Health Assessment and Life Prediction of Cutting Tools Based on Support Vector Regression,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 213–223, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bergmann, S., Feldkamp, N., and Strassburger, S., “Emulation of Control Strategies through Machine Learning in Manufacturing Simulations,” Journal of Simulation, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 38–50, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cho, S. J. and Kang, S. H., “Industrial Applications of Machine Learning (Artificial Intelligence),” Korean Institute Industrial Engineers ie Magazine, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 34–38, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Pontes, F. J., de Paiva, A. P., Balestrassi, P. P., Ferreira, J. R., and da Silva, M. B., “Optimization of Radial Basis Function Neural Network Employed for Prediction of Surface Roughness in Hard Turning Process Using Taguchi’s Orthogonal Arrays,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, No. 9, pp. 7776–7787, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Somashekhar, K. P.., Ramachandran, N., and Mathew, J., “Optimization of Material Removal Rate in Micro-EDM Using Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithms,” Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 467–475, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wuest, T., Irgens, C., and Thoben, K.-D., “An Approach to Monitoring Quality In Manufacturing Using Supervised Machine Learning on Product State Data,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 1167–1180, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Le Cun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G., “Deep Learning,” Nature, Vol. 521, No. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Schmidhuber, J., “Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overview,” Neural Networks, Vol. 61, pp. 85–117, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Vahabli, E. and Rahmati, S., “Application of an RBF Neural Network for FDM Parts’ Surface Roughness Prediction for Enhancing Surface Quality,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 17, No. 12, pp. 1589–1603, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mekid, S., Pruschek, P., and Hernandez, J., “Beyond Intelligent Manufacturing: A New Generation of Flexible Intelligent NC Machines,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 466–476, 2009.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Szkilnyk, G., Hughes, K., and Surgenor, B., “Vision Based Fault Detection of Automated Assembly Equipment,” Proc. of International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 691–697, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tüfekci, P., “Prediction of Full Load Electrical Power Output of a Base Load Operated Combined Cycle Power Plant Using Machine Learning Methods,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 60, pp. 126–140, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kroll, B., Schaffranek, D., Schriegel, S., and Niggemann, O., “System Modeling Based on Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection and Predictive Maintenance in Industrial Plants,” Proc. of IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA), pp. 1–7, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Elforjani, M. and Shanbr, S., “Prognosis of Bearing Acoustic Emission Signals Using Supervised Machine Learning,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 65, No. 7, pp. 5864–5871, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Pinto, A. M., Rocha, L. F., and Moreira, A. P., “Object Recognition Using Laser Range Finder and Machine Learning Techniques,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 12–22, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tsai, M.-S., Yen, C.-L., and Yau, H.-T., “Integration of an Empirical Mode Decomposition Algorithm with Iterative Learning Control for High-Precision Machining,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 878–886, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sumesh, A., Rameshkumar, K., Mohandas, K., and Babu, R. S., “Use of Machine Learning Algorithms for Weld Quality Monitoring Using Acoustic Signature,” Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 50, No. pp. 316–322, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yiakopoulos, C., Gryllias, K. C., and Antoniadis, I. A., “Rolling Element Bearing Fault Detection in Industrial Environments Based on a K-Means Clustering Approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 2888–2911, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chu, W.-S., Kim, M.-S., Jang, K.-H., Song, J.-H., Rodrigue, H., et al., “From Design for Manufacturing (DFM) to Manufacturing for Design (MFD) via Hybrid Manufacturing and Smart Factory: A Review and Perspective of Paradigm Shift,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 209–222, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chu, W.-S., Kim, C.-S., Lee, H.-T., Choi, J.-O., Park, J.-I., et al “Hybrid Manufacturing in Micro/Nano Scale: A Review,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 75–92, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lu, X., Hu, X., Wang, H., Si, L., Liu, Y., and Gao, L., “Research on the Prediction Model of Micro-Milling Surface Roughness of Inconel718 Based on SVM,” Industrial Lubrication and Tribology, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 206–211, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Peng, C., Wang, L., and Liao, T. W., “A New Method for the Prediction of Chatter Stability Lobes Based on Dynamic Cutting Force Simulation Model and Support Vector Machine,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 354, pp. 118–131, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhang, D., Bi, G., Sun, Z., and Guo, Y., “Online Monitoring of Precision Optics Grinding Using Acoustic Emission Based on Support Vector Machine,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 80, Nos. 5–8, pp. 761–774, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Deng, S., Xu, Y., Li, L., Li, X., and He, Y., “A Feature-Selection Algorithm Based on Support Vector Machine-Multiclass for Hyperspectral Visible Spectral Analysis,” Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 1, pp. 159–166, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Demetgul, M., “Fault Diagnosis on Production Systems with Support Vector Machine and Decision Trees Algorithms,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 67, Nos. 9–12, pp. 2183–2194, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Çaydaş, U. and Hascalık, A., “A Study on Surface Roughness in Abrasive Waterjet Machining Process Using Artificial Neural Networks and Regression Analysis Method,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 202, Nos. 1–3, pp. 574–582, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Laha, D., Ren, Y., and Suganthan, P. N., “Modeling of Steelmaking Process with Effective Machine Learning Techniques,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42, No. 10, pp. 4687–4696, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yuan, Y., Zhang, H.-T., Wu, Y., Zhu, T., and Ding, H., “Bayesian Learning-Based Model-Predictive Vibration Control for Thin-Walled Workpiece Machining Processes,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 509–520, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lu, Y., Rajora, M., Zou, P., and Liang, S. Y., “Physics-Embedded Machine Learning: Case Study with Electrochemical Micro-Machining,” Machines, Vol. 5, No. 1, Paper No. 4, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Jia, F., Lei, Y., Lin, J., Zhou, X., and Lu, N., “Deep Neural Networks: A Promising Tool for Fault Characteristic Mining and Intelligent Diagnosis of Rotating Machinery with Massive Data,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 72, pp. 303–315, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tan, S. C., Watada, J., Ibrahim, Z., and Khalid, M., “Evolutionary Fuzzy ARTMAP Neural Networks for Classification of Semiconductor Defects,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 933–950, 2015.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sukthomya, W. and Tannock, J., “The Optimisation of Neural Network Parameters Using Taguchi’s Design of Experiments Approach: An Application in Manufacturing Process Modelling,” Neural Computing & Applications, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 337–344, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Taga, Ö., Kiral, Z., and Yaman, K., “Determination of Cutting Parameters in End Milling Operation Based on the Optical Surface Roughness Measurement,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 579–589, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jang, D.-Y., Jung, J., and Seok, J., “Modeling and Parameter Optimization for Cutting Energy Reduction in MQL Milling Process,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 5–12, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Huang, P. B., Ma, C.-C., and Kuo, C.-H., “A PNN Self-Learning Tool Breakage Detection System in End Milling Operations,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 37, pp. 114–124, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pontes, F. J., Ferreira, J. R., Silva, M. B., Paiva, A. P., and Balestrassi, P. P., “Artificial Neural Networks for Machining Processes Surface Roughness Modeling,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 49, Nos. 9–12, pp. 879–902, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Le, C. V., Pang, C. K., Gan, O. P., Chee, X. M., Zhang, D. H., et al., “Classification of Energy Consumption Patterns for Energy Audit and Machine Scheduling in Industrial Manufacturing Systems,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 583–592, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Yuan, J., Wang, K., Yu, T., and Fang, M., “Reliable Multi-Objective Optimization of High-Speed WEDM Process Based on Gaussian Process Regression,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 47–60, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kupp, N., Huang, K., Carulli, J., and Makris, Y., “Spatial Estimation of Wafer Measurement Parameters Using Gaussian Process Models,” Proc. of 2012 IEEE International Test Conference, pp. 1–8, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., and Meyarivan, T., “A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 182–197, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Su, M.-S., Chia, C.-C., Chen, C.-Y., and Chen, J.-F., “Classification of Partial Discharge Events in GILBS Using Probabilistic Neural Networks and the Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Approach,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 61, pp. 173–179, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Majumder, A., “Comparative Study of Three Evolutionary Algorithms Coupled with Neural Network Model for Optimization of Electric Discharge Machining Process Parameters,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 229, No. 9, pp. 1504–1516, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Polczynski, M. and Kochanski, A., “Knowledge Discovery and Analysis in Manufacturing,” Quality Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 169–181, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Lin, W., Yu, D., Wang, S., Zhang, C., Zhang, S., et al., “Multi-Objective Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization Algorithm for Reducing Carbon Emissions and Operation Time in Turning Operations,” Engineering Optimization, Vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 994–1007, 2015.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Shaban, Y., Yacout, S., Balazinski, M., Meshreki, M., and Attia, H., “Diagnosis of Machining Outcomes Based on Machine Learning with Logical Analysis of Data,” Proc. of International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM), pp. 1–8, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    García-Ordás, M., “Wear Characterization of the Cutting Tool in Milling Processes Using Shape and Texture Descriptors,” Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de León, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Cho, S., Asfour, S., Onar, A., and Kaundinya, N., “Tool Breakage Detection Using Support Vector Machine Learning in a Milling Process,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 241–249, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Wu, D., Jennings, C., Terpenny, J., Gao, R. X., and Kumara, S., “A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Prediction Using Random Forests,” Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 7, Paper No. 071018, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Park, J., Law, K. H., Bhinge, R., Biswas, N., Srinivasan, A., et al., “A Generalized Data-Driven Energy Prediction Model with Uncertainty for a Milling Machine Tool Using Gaussian Process,” Proc. of American Society of Mechanical Engineers on International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Vol. 2, Paper No. MSEC2015–9354, 2015.

  59. 59.

    Bhinge, R., Biswas, N., Dornfeld, D., Park, J., Law, K. H., et al., “An Intelligent Machine Monitoring System for Energy Prediction Using a Gaussian Process Regression,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Big Data, pp. 978–986, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Klancnik, S., Brezocnik, M., and Balic, J., “Intelligent CAD/CAM System for Programming of CNC Machine Tools,” International Journal of Simulation Modeling, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 109–120, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Krishnakumar, P., Rameshkumar, K., and Ramachandran, K., “Tool Wear Condition Prediction Using Vibration Signals in High Speed Machining (HSM) of Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) Alloy,” Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 50, pp. 270–275, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Arnold, F., Hänel, A., Nestler, A., and Brosius, A., “New Approaches for the Determination of Specific Values for Process Models in Machining Using Artificial Neural Networks,” Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 11, pp. 1463–1470, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Elangovan, M., Sakthivel, N., Saravanamurugan, S., Nair, B. B., and Sugumaran, V., “Machine Learning Approach to the Prediction of Surface Roughness Using Statistical Features of Vibration Signal Acquired in Turning,” Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 50, pp. 282–288, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Jurkovic, Z., Cukor, G., Brezocnik, M., and Brajkovic, T., “A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Cutting Parameters Prediction in High Speed Turning Process,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2016. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1206-1)

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    D’Addona, D. M., Ullah, A. S., and Matarazzo, D., “Tool-Wear Prediction and Pattern-Recognition Using Artificial Neural Network and DNA-Based Computing,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 1285–1301, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Painuli, S., Elangovan, M., and Sugumaran, V., “Tool Condition Monitoring Using K-Star Algorithm,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 2638–2643, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Karam, S., Centobelli, P., D’Addona, D. M., and Teti, R., “Online Prediction of Cutting Tool Life in Turning via Cognitive Decision Making,” Procedia CIRP, Vol. 41, pp. 927–932, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Tosun, N. and Özler, L., “A Study of Tool Life in Hot Machining Using Artificial Neural Networks and Regression Analysis Method,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 124, Nos. 1–2, pp. 99–104, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Saravanamurugan, S., Thiyagu, S., Sakthivel, N., and Nair, B. B., “Chatter Prediction in Boring Process Using Machine Learning Technique,” International Journal of Manufacturing Research, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 405–422, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Jędrzejewski, J. and Kwaśny, W., “Artificial Intelligence Tools in Diagnostics of Machine Tool Drives,” CIRP Annals, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 411–414, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Miao, E.-M., Gong, Y.-Y., Niu, P.-C., Ji, C.-Z., and Chen, H.-D., “Robustness of Thermal Error Compensation Modeling Models of CNC Machine Tools,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 69, Nos. 9–12, pp. 2593–2603, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Park, H.-S. and Tran, N.-H., “Development of a Smart Machining System Using Self-Optimizing Control,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 74, Nos. 9–12, pp. 1365–1380, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Teixidor, D., Grzenda, M., Bustillo, A., and Ciurana, J., “Modeling Pulsed Laser Micromachining of Micro Geometries Using Machine-Learning Techniques,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 801–814, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Ćojbašić, Ž., Petković, D., Shamshirband, S., Tong, C. W., Ch, S., et al., “Surface Roughness Prediction by Extreme Learning Machine Constructed with Abrasive Water Jet,” Precision Engineering, Vol. 43, pp. 86–92, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Deris, A. M., Zain, A. M., and Sallehuddin, R., “Hybrid GR-SVM for Prediction of Surface Roughness in Abrasive Water Jet Machining,” Meccanica, Vol. 48, No. 8, pp. 1937–1945, 2013.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Chiang, K.-T. and Chang, F.-P., “Optimization of the WEDM Process of Particle-Reinforced Material with Multiple Performance Characteristics Using Grey Relational Analysis,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 180, Nos. 1–3, pp. 96–101, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Mellal, M. A. and Williams, E. J., “Parameter Optimization of Advanced Machining Processes Using Cuckoo Optimization Algorithm and Hoopoe Heuristic,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 927–942, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Ullah, S. M. S., Muhammad, I., and Ko, T. J., “Optimal Strategy to Deal with Decision Making Problems in Machine Tools Remanufacturing,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 19–26, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Panda, B. N., Bahubalendruni, M. R., and Biswal, B. B., “A General Regression Neural Network Approach for the Evaluation of Compressive Strength of FDM Prototypes,” Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 1129–1136, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Kıran, M. S. and Fındık, O., “A Directed Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm,” Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 26, pp. 454–462, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Wright, P. K., “21st Century Manufacturing,” Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Walker, J., “Machine Learning in Manufacturing-Present and Future Use-Cases,” https://doi.org/www.techemergence.com/machinelearning-in-manufacturing/ (Accessed 8 AUG 2018)

  83. 83.

    Busch, R., “Artificial Intelligence: Optimizing Industrial Operations,” https://doi.org/www.siemens.com/innovation/en/home/picturesof-the-future/industry-and-automation/the-future-of-manufacturingai-in-industry.html, 2017, (Accessed 31 January)

  84. 84.

    Petry, D., “Siemens and IBM to bring Watson Analytics to MindSphere,” https://doi.org/www.siemens.com/press/en/pressrelease/?press=/en/pressrelease/2016/digitalfactory/pr2016120102dfen.htm (Accessed 8 AUG 2018)

  85. 85.

    Pease, A. F., “Tomorrow’s Information Factories,” https://doi.org/www.siemens.com/global/en/home/company/innovation/pictures-of-the-future/fom.html (Accessed 8 AUG 2018)

  86. 86.

    Gold, S., “How to Step inside a Gas Turbine,” https://doi.org/www.siemens.com/innovation/en/home/pictures-of-the-future/digitalization-and-software/simulation-and-virtual-reality-simulationsgas-turbines.html (Accessed 8 AUG 2018)

  87. 87.

    Trsek, H., “Isochronous Wireless Network for Real-Time Communication in Industrial Automation,” Springer, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    GE Imagination at Work, “GE Launches Brilliant Manufacturing Suite to Help Manufacturers Increase Production Efficiency, Execution and Optimization through Advanced Analytics,” https://doi.org/www.ge.com/digital/press-releases/ge-launches-brilliant-manufacturing-suite (Accessed 8 AUG 2018)

  89. 89.

    Knight, W., “This Factory Robot Learns a New Job Overnight,” https://doi.org/www.technologyreview.com/s/601045/this-factory-robotlearns-a-new-job-overnight/ (Accessed 8 AUG 2018)

  90. 90.

    Peukert, B., Benecke, S., Clavell, J., Neugebauer, S., Nissen, N. F., et al., “Addressing Sustainability and Flexibility in Manufacturing via Smart Modular Machine Tool Frames to Support Sustainable Value Creation,” Procedia CIRP, Vol. 29, pp. 514–519, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Yoon, H.-S., Lee, H.-T., Jang, K.-H., Kim, C.-S., Park, H., et al., “CAD/CAM for Scalable Nanomanufacturing: A Network-Based System for Hybrid 3D Printing,” Microsystems & Nanoengineering, Vol. 3, Paper No. 17072, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Cao, H., Zhang, X., and Chen, X., “The Concept and Progress of Intelligent Spindles: A Review,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 112, pp. 21–52, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Chen, T.-C., Chen, Y.-J., Hung, M.-H., and Hung, J.-P., “Design Analysis of Machine Tool Structure with Artificial Granite Material,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 1–14, 2016. (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016656533)

    Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Park, H.-S., Qi, B., Dang, D.-V., and Park, D. Y., “Development of Smart Machining System for Optimizing Feedrates to Minimize Machining Time,” Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 299–304, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Jędrzejewski, J. and Kwaśny, W., “Discussion of Machine Tool Intelligence, Based on Selected Concepts and Research,” Journal of Machine Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 5–26, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Tapoglou, N., Mehnen, J., Butans, J., and Morar, N. I., “Online On-Board Optimization of Cutting Parameter for Energy Efficient CNC Milling,” Procedia CIRP, Vol. 40, pp. 384–389, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Rao, R. V. and Kalyankar, V., “Parameters Optimization of Advanced Machining Processes Using TLBO Algorithm,” International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM), Singapore, Science Direct, pp. 20–21, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Gao, S. and Huang, H., “Recent Advances in Micro-And Nano-Machining Technologies,” Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 18–32, 2017.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Fujishima, M., Mori, M., Nishimura, K., and Ohno, K., “Study on Quality Improvement of Machine Tools,” Procedia CIRP, Vol. 59, pp. 156–159, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Ahn, S. H., Sundararajan, V., Smith, C., Kannan, B., D’ Souza, R., et al., “Cybercut: An Internet-Based CAD/CAM System,” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 52–59, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Garcıa, J. and Fernández, F., “A Comprehensive Survey on Safe Reinforcement Learning,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1437–1480, 2015.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Achiam, J., Held, D., Tamar, A., and Abbeel, P., “Constrained Policy Optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.10528, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Aswani, A., Gonzalez, H., Sastry, S. S., and Tomlin, C., “Provably Safe and Robust Learning-Based Model Predictive Control,” Automatica, Vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 1216–1226, 2013.

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Akametalu, A. K., Kaynama, S., Fisac, J. F., Zeilinger, M. N., Gillula, J. H., et al., “Reachability-Based Safe Learning with Gaussian Processes,” Proc. of the 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 1424–1431, 2014.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Berkenkamp, F., Turchetta, M., Schoellig, A., and Krause, A., “Safe Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guarantees,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 908–918, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Madry, A., Makelov, A., Schmidt, L., Tsipras, D., and Vladu, A., “Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06083, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Jha, S., Fredrikson, M., Celik, Z. B., et al., “The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings,” Proc. of IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P), pp. 372–387, 2016.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Humayed, A., Lin, J., Li, F., and Luo, B., “Cyber-Physical Systems Security-A Survey,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 1802–1831, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Barreno, M., Nelson, B., Joseph, A. D., and Tygar, J., “The Security of Machine Learning,” Machine Learning, Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 121–148, 2010.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung-Hoon Ahn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, DH., Kim, T.J.Y., Wang, X. et al. Smart Machining Process Using Machine Learning: A Review and Perspective on Machining Industry. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 5, 555–568 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0057-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • 4th industrial revolution
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Machine learning
  • Machining process
  • Machining industry