Skip to main content
Log in

Fabrication and Performance of Segmented Thermoplastic Composite Wind Turbine Blades

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large-scale wind turbine blades exceed 50 m in length, and they are currently fashioned as single pieces. Along with the significant challenge of fabricating these blades, there is also an issue of transporting them to field sites, which can account for a substantial portion of the installation cost. Further, typical blades are produced from thermoset composite materials, which cannot be reused at the end of the turbine lifetime. Therefore, a new manufacturing process is developed, forming the blades in smaller segments that can be joined after transportation to the field. The process uses vacuum-assisted thermoforming of thermoplastic composites, which can be recycled after use. Six turbine blades were fabricated from two separate segments composed of two elements each, and they were joined using fusion welding and adhesives. A set of three blades was tested at a small-scale wind farm, producing power outputs on the order of 20 W at low wind speeds, comparable to an existing commercial turbine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CLmax :

The maximum lift coefficient

α :

The angle of attack

c :

The chord length

θ p :

The pitch angle

U :

The blade velocity

r :

The radius

P :

The power

Pw :

The wind power

V :

The local wind speed

ρ :

The density

Cp :

The power coefficient

References

  1. U.S. Energy Information Administration, “International Energy Statistics,” www.eia.gov (Accessed 16 MAR 2018)

  2. Abedinia, O. and Amjady, N., “Short-Term Wind Power Prediction Based on Hybrid Neural Network and Chaotic Shark Smell Optimization,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 245–254, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, H., Kim, K., and Paek, I., “Power Regulation of Upstream Wind Turbines for Power Increase in a Wind Farm,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., Vol. 17, No. 5 pp. 665–670. 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park, Y.-J., Kim, J.-G., Lee, G.-H., Kim, Y.-J., and Oh, J.-Y., “Effects of Bearing Characteristics on Load Distribution and Sharing of Pitch Reducer for Wind Turbine,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 55–65, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sung, C.-M. and Han, M.-C., “Design and Performance Evaluation of Hinge Type Pitch Control System in Small-Size Wind Turbine,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 335–341, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wind Power Monthly, “The Ten Biggest Turbines in the World,” https://www.windpowermonthly.com/10-biggest-turbines (Accessed 16 MAR 2018)

  7. Cotrell, J., Musial, W., and Hughes, S., “Necessity and Requirements of a Collaborative Effort to Develop a Large Wind Turbine Blade Test Facility in North America,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Technical Report #TP-500-38044, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brondsted, P., Lilholt, H., and Lystrup, A., “Composite Materials for Wind Power Turbine Blades,” Annual Review of Materials Research, Vol. 35, pp. 505–538, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parks, L. G. and Dawson, H., “Wind Turbine Manufacturing in the U.S.: Developments and Considerations,” New York: Nova Science, 1st Ed., 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhandari, B., Poudel, S., R., Lee, K. T., Ahn, S. H., “Mathematical Modeling of Hybrid Renewable Energy System: A Review on Small Hydro-Solar-Wind Power Generation,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 157–173, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, K., “WindPACT Turbine Design Scaling Studies Technical Area 2 -Turbine, Rotor, and Blade Logistics,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Technical Report, Article ID: SR-500-29439, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Veers, P. S., Ashwill, T. D., Sutherland, H. J., Laird, D. L., Lobitz, D. W., et al., “Trends in the Design, Manufacture and Evaluation of Wind Turbine Blades,” Wind Energy, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 245–259, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Larsen, K., “Recycling Wind,” Renewable Energy Focus, Vol. 9, No. 7, pp. 70–73, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim, J.-W. and Lee, D.-G., “Study on the Fiber Orientation during Compression Molding of Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 335–339, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bullis, K., “The Quest for the Monster Wind Turbine Blade,” MIT Technology Review, https://www.technologyreview.com/s/ 510031/ the-quest-for-the-monster-wind-turbine-blade (Accessed 16 MAR 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Offringa, A. R., “Thermoplastic Composites -Rapid Processing Applications,” Composites Part A-Applied Science and Manufacturing, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 329–336, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffin, D. A. and Ashwill, T. D., “Alternative Composite Materials for Megawatt-Scale Wind Turbine Blades: Design Considerations and Recommended Testing,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-Transactions of the ASME, Vol. 125, No. 4, pp. 515–521, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grand, J. A., “Wind Power Blades Energize Composites Manufacturing,” Plastics Technology, Vol. 54, No. 10, pp. 68–77, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sunforce Products, “600 Watt Marine Turbine,” User’s Manual, 2011.

  20. Hansen, A. C. and Butterfield, C. P., “Aerodynamics of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbines,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 25, pp. 115–149, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tangler, J. L., “The Evolution of Rotor and Blade Design,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Technical Report, Article ID: CP-500-28410, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Drela, M., “XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils,” Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, Springer-Verlag, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Melin, T., “Parametric Airfoil Catalog, Part II: Göttingen 673 to YS930: An Aerodynamic and Geometric Comparison Between Parametrized and Point Cloud Airfoils,” Linköping University Electronic Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Da Rosa, A. V., “Fundamentals of Renewable Energy Processes,” 3rd Ed., Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Prabhakaran, R. T. D., “Are Reactive Thermoplastic Polymers Suitable for Future Wind Turbine Composite Materials Blades?” Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 213–221, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hodge, B. K., “Alternative Energy Systems and Applications,” John Wiley & Sons, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dave Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garate, J., Solovitz, S.A. & Kim, D. Fabrication and Performance of Segmented Thermoplastic Composite Wind Turbine Blades. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 5, 271–277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0028-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0028-3

Keywords

Navigation