Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental impact assessment of composite small craft manufacturing using the generic work breakdown structure

  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 12 October 2016

Abstract

The number of studies on the environmental impact of products and services has increased in order to protect the environment. Recently, environmental impact assessments (EIA) and life cycle assessments (LCA), typically used for evaluating environmental impacts, have been gaining in popularity. Accordingly, this study performed an EIA using LCA methodology focusing on the manufacture of composite small craft. A work breakdown structure (WBS) is used in most shipyards to manage the overall life cycle of a craft. Therefore, for the EIA performed as part of this study, the generic WBS for environment (GWBSE) was defined by utilizing existing shipyard information. Unlike a general WBS with a determined structure, the GWBSE structure supports different combinations depending on the objectives; the EIA can be performed by combining different methods, materials, and product structures used in the manufacturing process for composite craft. Further, this study developed an application to effectively perform EIA utilizing GWBSE. The EIA was performed according to the manufacturing method and the combination of materials used for small leisure craft; the results were then analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

i:

Index of generic object

j:

Index of manufacturing process

k:

Index of material choice

l:

Index of environmental indicator

I:

Total number of generic objects

L:

Total number of environmental indicators

EI jk :

Environmental impact value of the target product against to the manufacturing process j and material k

p ijkl :

Environmental impact score of generic object i, manufacturing process j, material choice k, environmental indicator l

w l :

Weighted value of environmental indicator l

r i :

Proportion ratio of generic object i

References

  1. Yun, J.-H., Jeong, M.-S., Lee, S.-K., Jeon, J.-W., Park, J.-Y., et al., “Sustainable Production of Helical Pinion Gears: Environmental Effects and Product Quality,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 37–41, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Meng, Q., Li, F.-Y., Zhou, L.-R., Li, J., Ji, Q.-Q., et al., “A Rapid Life Cycle Assessment Method Based on Green Features in Supporting Conceptual Design,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Tech., Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 189–196, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayman, B., Dogliani, M., Kvale, I., and Fet, A. M., “Technologies for Reduced Environmental Impact from Ships-Ship Building, Maintenance and Dismantling Aspects,” 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tincelin, T., Mermier, L., Pierson, Y., Pelerin, E., and Jouanne, G., “A Life Cycle Approach to Shipbuilding and Ship Operation,” Proc. of the International Conference on Ship Design and Operation for Environmental Sustainability, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., et al., “Life Cycle Assessment: Part 1: Framework, Goal and Scope Definition, Inventory Analysis, and Applications,” Environment International, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 701–720, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vogtländer, J. G., Lindeijer, E., Witte, J. P. M., and Hendriks, C., “Characterizing the Change of Land-Use Based on Flora: Application for EIA and LCA,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 47–57, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, X., Zhu, Y., and Zhang, Z., “An LCA-Based Environmental Impact Assessment Model for Construction Processes,” Building and Environment, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 766–775, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Glasson, J., Therivel, R., and Chadwick, A., “Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment,” Routledge, 4th Ed., pp. 14–15, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tukker, A., “Life Cycle Assessment as a Tool in Environmental Impact Assessment,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 435–456, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finnveden, G. and Moberg, Å., “Environmental Systems Analysis Tools-an Overview,” Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 1165–1173, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Manuilova, A., Suebsiri, J., and Wilson, M., “Should Life Cycle Assessment be Part of the Environmental Impact Assessment? Case Study: EIA of CO2 Capture and Storage in Canada,” Energy Procedia, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 4511–4518, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Olofsson, K., Arnestad, G., Lönnö, A., Hedlund-Åström, A., Jansson, T., et al., “A High-Speed Craft with Composite Hull,” Proc. of the 13th European Conference of Composite Materials, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Okayama, Y. and Chirillo, L. D., “Product Work Breakdown Structure,” National Shipbuilding Research Program, Vol. 117, Washington, D.C.: US Department of Commerce, Maritime Administration in Cooperation with Todd Pacific Shipyards Corporation, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, D. K., Nam, S. H., Jeong, Y.-K., and Shin, J.-G., “Development of a Generic-YWBS for Engineering Integrated Management of Sailing Yacht,” Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, Vol. 51, No. 1. pp. 16–25, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koenig, P. C., MacDonald, P., Lamb, T., and Dougherty, J., “Towards a Generic Product-Oriented Work Breakdown Structure for Shipbuilding,” The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, pp. 21–23, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., et al., “Life Cycle Assessment Part 1: Framework, Goal and Scope Definition, Inventory Analysis, and Applications,” Environmental International, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 701–720, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson, J., Jansz, A., Steele, K., Thislethwaie., P., Bishop, G., et al., “Green Guide to Composites: An Environmental Profiling System for Composite Materials and Products,” REB Press, 1st Ed., pp. 1–35, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jeong, Y.-K., Lee, P., Nam, S. H., Lee, D. K., and Shin, J.-G., “Development of the Methodology for Environmental Impact of Composite Boats Manufacturing Process,” Procedia CIRP, Vol. 29, pp. 456–461, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Kun Lee.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40684-016-0050-2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nam, S., Lee, D.K., Jeong, YK. et al. Environmental impact assessment of composite small craft manufacturing using the generic work breakdown structure. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 3, 261–272 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-016-0034-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-016-0034-2

Keywords

Navigation