Sleep Tracking: a Systematic Review of the Research Using Commercially Available Technology
Purpose of Review
To systematically review the available research studies that characterize the benefits, uncertainty, or weaknesses of commercially available sleep-tracking technology.
Sleep is a vital component of health and well-being. Research shows that tracking sleep using commercially available sleep-tracking technology (e.g., wearable or smartphone-based) is increasingly popular in the general population.
Systematic literature searches were conducted using PubMed/Medline, Embase (Ovid) the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL, and Web of Science Plus (which included results from BIOSIS Citation Index, InSpec, and Food, Science and Technology Abstracts) (n = 842).
Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Three independent reviewers reviewed eligible articles that administered a commercially available sleep tracker to participants and reported on sleep parameters as captured by the tracker, including either sleep duration or quality. Eligible articles had to include sleep data from users for > = 4 nights.
Seven articles met criteria for review. A wearable sleep tracker (e.g., wrist-based) was utilized to track sleep in five of the seven studies, a smartphone-based sleep tracker app was used to record sleep in two of the seven studies. Studies in this review may be characterized in several broad categories, including studies that examined: (1) sleep before and after a clinical procedure (e.g., surgery) (two studies); (2) sleep and a health-related outcome (e.g., asthma symptoms (two studies); (3) the relationship between sleep tracker data and self-reported sleep (one study); and (4) sleep tracker data before and after major political events (one study). Among the studies examining sleep tracker data and health-related outcomes, sleep tracker data was associated with health outcomes, including asthma symptoms, blood pressure, and mood.
KeywordsSleep tracking Health promotion Sleep research Mobile technology Information technology
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Rebecca Robbins, Azizi Seixas, Lillian Walton Masters, Nicholas Chanko, Fatou Diaby, Dorice Vieira, and Girardin Jean-Louis each declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 2.Watson NF, Badr MS, Belenky G, Bliwise DL, Buxton OM, Buysse D, et al. Joint consensus statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society on the recommended amount of sleep for a healthy adult: methodology and discussion. Sleep. 2015;38:1161–83. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.4886.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 5.Sheehan CM, Frochen SE, Walsemann KM, Ailshire JA. Are U.S. adults reporting less sleep?: findings from sleep duration trends in the National Health Interview Survey, 2004–2017. Sleep. 2019;42. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsy221.
- 8.Stranges S, Tigbe W, Gómez-Olivé FX, Thorogood M, Kandala N-B. Sleep problems: an emerging global epidemic? Findings from the INDEPTH WHO-SAGE study among more than 40,000 older adults from 8 countries across Africa and Asia. Sleep. 2012;35:1173–81. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.2012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.• Robbins R, Krebs P, Rapoport DM, Jean-Louis G, Duncan DT. Examining use of mobile phones for sleep tracking among a national sample in the USA. Health Commun. 2018;0:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1422104 This study used a sample of geographically representative adults to examine self-reported use of sleep-tracking apps. Results of the study show approximately one quarter of adults reported use of sleep-tracking apps. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Mobile Fact Sheet. In: Pew research center: internet, Science & Tech [internet]. 12 Jan 2017 [cited 27 Jul 2017]. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/.
- 12.Research2guidance. Mobile Health Market Report 2013–2017: The commercialization of mHealth applications. Berlin; 2013.Google Scholar
- 16.Bian J, Guo Y, Xie M, Parish AE, Wardlaw I, Brown R, et al. Exploring the association between self-reported asthma impact and Fitbit-derived sleep quality and physical activity measures in adolescents. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2017;5. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7346.
- 17.• Anýž J, Bakštein E, Dudysová D, Veldová K, Kliková M, Fárková E, et al. No wink of sleep: population sleep characteristics in response to the brexit poll and the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Soc Sci Med 1982. 2019;222:112–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.024 This study used data from a commercially available sleep tracker to compare sleep before and after major political events in the UK and the USA. Results suggested a significant drop in sleep duration on the night after major political events in both countries. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Weatherall J, Paprocki Y, Meyer TM, Kudel I, Witt EA. Sleep tracking and exercise in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (step-D): pilot study to determine correlations between Fitbit data and patient-reported outcomes. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2018;6:e131. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.8122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Fagherazzi G, El Fatouhi D, Bellicha A, El Gareh A, Affret A, Dow C, et al. An international study on the determinants of poor sleep amongst 15,000 users of connected devices. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7930.
- 21.Agarwal DK, Viers BR, Rivera ME, Nienow DA, Frank I, Tollefson MK, et al. Physical activity monitors can be successfully implemented to assess perioperative activity in urologic surgery. mHealth. 2018;4. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2018.09.05.
- 22.DeMasi O, Feygin S, Dembo A, Aguilera A, Recht B. Well-being tracking via smartphone-measured activity and sleep: cohort study. JMIR MHealth UHealth. 2017;5. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7820.
- 29.• de Zambotti M, Goldstone A, Claudatos S, Colrain IM, Baker FC. A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2TMcompared with polysomnography in adults. Chronobiol Int. 2018;35:465–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2017.1413578 This study compared a commercially available sleep tracker, the FitBit Charge 2, to the polysomnography, which is the gold standard for sleep measurement. Results suggested the sleep tracker overestimated sleep time, yet did not differ from PSG in measurement of wake after sleep onset (WASO) or time spent in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. CrossRefGoogle Scholar