Screening for Sleep Apnea: When and How?
- 16 Downloads
Purpose of Review
Several models aimed at screening for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have been published, and most of these are based on questions containing clinical, demographic, and anthropometric features previously identified as OSA risk factors. Here, our main objective was to review the usefulness of some of these screening tools and delineate their performance when attempting to identify subjects at risk for OSA.
We evaluated some of the most cited screening tools including Sleep Apnea Clinical Score, Berlin and STOP-Bang questionnaires, Four-Variable Screening Tool, NoSAS score, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Analysis of the predictive performance of the different tools is influenced by the sleep test used, the type of population studied, and the threshold of the apnea/hypopnea index used for OSA diagnosis.
Nowadays, it would appear that the most employed screening instrument is the STOP-Bang questionnaire. It is a mnemonic method with eight questions dichotomized into yes-or-no responses and exhibits high sensitivity at all levels of OSA severity while also having been widely validated in several different populations.
KeywordsObstructive sleep apnea Polysomnography Diagnostic test Screening
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Ricardo L. M. Duarte, Flavio J. Magalhães-da-Silveira, and David Gozal each declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 16.Kapur VK, Auckley DH, Chowdhuri S, Kuhlmann DC, Mehra R, Ramar K, et al. Clinical practice guideline for diagnostic testing for adult obstructive sleep apnea: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(3):479–504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.•• Abrishami A, Khajehdehi A, Chung F. A systematic review of screening questionnaires for obstructive sleep apnea. Can J Anesth. 2010;57(5):423–38. Detailed systematic review on several screening models applied in clinical practice: inconsistency of results possibly due to studies with heterogeneous design (population, questionnaire type, and validity). CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.•• Ramachandran SK, Josephs LA. A meta-analysis of clinical screening tests for obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(4):928–39. Meta-analysis designed to compare clinical screening tests for obstructive sleep apnea and establish an evidence base for their preoperative use. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Collop NA, Anderson WM, Boehlecke B, Claman D, Goldberg R, Gottlieb DJ, et al. Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable monitoring task force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007;3(7):737–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.• Nagappa M, Patra J, Wong J, Subramani Y, Singh M, Ho G, et al. Association of STOP-Bang questionnaire as a screening tool for sleep apnea and postoperative complications: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective cohort studies. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(4):1301–8. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the main complications present in surgical patients screened with STOP-Bang. This study supports the implementation of the STOP-Bang questionnaire as a perioperative risk stratification tool. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.• Jonas DE, Amick HR, Feltner C, Weber RP, Arvanitis M, Stine A, et al. Screening for obstructive sleep apnea in adults: evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2017;317(4):415–33. The US Preventive Services Task Force concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for OSA in asymptomatic adults CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Nigro CA, Dibur E, Borsini E, Malnis S, Ernst G, Bledel I, et al. The influence of gender on symptoms associated with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-017-1612-4.
- 53.• Myers KA, Mrkobrada M, Simel DL. Does this patient have obstructive sleep apnea? The rational clinical examination systematic review. JAMA. 2013;310(7):731–41. Careful systematic review of the various items of signs and symptoms used in the clinical suspicion of obstructive sleep apnea: nocturnal gasping or choking is the most reliable indicator of obstructive sleep apnea, whereas snoring is not very specific CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 54.• Steyerberg EW, Vickers AJ, Cook NR, Gerds T, Gonen M, Obuchowski N, et al. Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for some traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology. 2010;21(1):128–38. This study shows useful measures for assessing performance of predictive models as Brier score to indicate overall performance, discriminative ability by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and goodness-of-fit statistics for calibration CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 69.Soler X, Liao S-Y, Marin JM, Lorenzi-Filho G, Jen R, DeYoung P, et al. Age, gender, neck circumference, and Epworth sleepiness scale do not predict obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): the challenge to predict OSA in advanced COPD. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177289.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 89.•• Nagappa M, Liao P, Wong J, Auckley D, Ramachandran SK, Memtsoudis S, et al. Validation of the STOP-Bang questionnaire as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea among different populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0143697. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the several studies validating the STOP-Bang questionnaire in several settings Google Scholar
- 98.Duarte RL, Rabahi MF, Magalhães-da-Silveira FJ, Oliveira-e-Sá TS, Mello FC, Gozal D. Simplifying the screening of obstructive sleep apnea with a 2-item model, named “No-Apnea”: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Sleep Med 2018 (in press).Google Scholar