Skip to main content

Enhanced Learning and Retention of Medical Knowledge Using the Mobile Flash card Application Anki

Abstract

Introduction

As medical schools condense the basic science phase of undergraduate medical education, it has become increasingly important to identify methods and tools that facilitate learning, mastery, and application of medical knowledge. One increasingly popular tool that promotes engagement with content is Anki, a web-based flash card system. Using Anki, medical students can access pre-made flash cards specifically tailored to prepare students for the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 exam. The objective of this study was to identify Anki use and its association to USMLE Step 1 performance.

Methods

In March 2020, medical students in years 2, 3, and 4 who had completed USMLE Step 1 were administered a survey to measure Anki usage. The survey was locally developed and was reviewed by survey experts on campus. Survey responses were paired with USMLE Step 1 results for analyses. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for analysis.

Results

Anki usage was associated with higher USMLE Step 1 scores. Additionally, amongst those who used Anki, those with more consistent use had higher USMLE Step 1 scores and higher perceived levels of knowledge retention.

Conclusions

This research suggests that Anki is an effective educational tool that should be recommended to medical students alongside other evidenced-based study tools, such as the popular question bank USMLE World. Future research should attempt to identify a relationship between Anki usage and future clinical performance to demonstrate the implications that Anki has on clinical skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Availability of Data and Material (Data Transparency)

Data is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Code Availability (Software Application or Custom Code)

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.

    Schneid SD, Pashler H, Armour C. How much basic science content do second-year medical students remember from their first year? Med Teach. 2019;41(2):231–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Custers EJFM. Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review study. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2010;15:109–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Roediger HL III, Karpicke JD. The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006;1(3):181–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    McSparron JI, Vanka A, Smith CC. Cognitive learning theory for clinical teaching. Clin Teach. 2019;16:96–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Racsmány M, Szõllõsi Á, Bencze D. Retrieval practice makes procedure from remembering: an automatization account of the testing effect. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cog. 2018;44(1):157–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lee HS, Ahn D. Testing prepares students to learn better: the forward effect of testing in category learning. J Educ Psychol. 2018;110(2):203–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Greene RL. Repetition and spacing effects. In Roediger III HL (Ed.). Learning and memory: a comprehensive reference (Vol. 2): cognitive psychology of memory. Oxford: Elsevier; 2008. pp. 65–78.

  8. 8.

    Karpicke JD, Roediger HL III. Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials? Mem Cogn. 2010;38(1):116–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gardiner JM, Craik FIM, Bleasdale FA. Retrieval difficulty and subsequent recall. Mem Cognit. 1973;1(3):213–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pyc MA, Rawson KA. Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice. Mem Cognit. 2007;35(8):1917–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Karpicke JD, Bauernschmidt A. Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011;37(5):1250–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Parry S, Pachunka J, Beck Dallaghan GL. Factors predictive of performance on USMLE Step 1: do commercial study aids improve scores? Med Sci Educ. 2019;29(3):667–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00722-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Deng F, Gluckstein JA, Larsen DP. Student-directed retrieval practice is a predictor of medical licensing examination performance. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:308–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Senzaki S, Hackathorn J, Appleby DC, Gurung RAR. Reinventing flashcards to increase student learning. Psychol Learn Teach. 2017;16(3):353–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Schmidmaier R, Ebersbach R, Schiller M, Hege I, Holzer M, Fischer MR. Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: retesting versus restudying. Med Educ. 2011;45(11):1101–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04043.x. PMID: 21988625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rana T, Laoteppitaks C, Zhang G, Troutman G, Chandra S. An investigation of Anki flashcards as a study tool among first year medical students learning anatomy. FASEB J. 2020;34(S1):1. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasdbj.2020.34.s1.09736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sun M, Tsai S, Engle DL, Holmer S. Spaced repetition flashcards for teaching medical students psychiatry. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31:1125–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wu W, Garcia K, Chandrahas S, Siddiqui A, Baronia R, Ibrahim Y. Predictors of performance on USMLE Step 1. Southwest Respir Crit Care Chron. 2021;9(39):63–72. Available from: https://pulmonarychronicles.com/index.php/pulmonarychronicles/article/view/813. Accessed 25 Aug 2021.

  19. 19.

    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Versteeg M, Hendriks RA, Thomas A, Ommering BWC, Steendijk P. Conceptualising spaced learning in health professions education: a scoping review. Med Educ. 2020;54:205–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kerfoot BP, DeWolf WC, Masser BA, Church PA, Federman DD. Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ. 2007;41:23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dobson JL. Effect of selected “desirable difficulty” learning strategies on the retention of physiology information. Adv Physiol Educ. 2011;35:378–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kerfoot BP. Learning benefits of on-line spaced education persist for 2 years. J Urol. 2009;181:2671–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Boespflug A, Guerra J, Dalle S, Thomas L. Enhancement of customary dermoscopy education with spaced education e-learning: a prospective controlled trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:847–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kerfoot BP. Adaptive spaced education improves learning efficiency: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2010;183:678–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kerfoot BP, Fu Y, Baker H, Connelly D, Ritchey ML, Genega EM. Online spaced education generates transfer and improves long-term retention of diagnostic skills: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:331–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gauer JL, Jackson JB. The association between United States Medical Licensing Examination scores and clinical performance in medical students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019;26(10):209–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kenny S, McInnes M, Singh V. Associations between residency selection strategies and doctor performance: a meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2013;47(8):790–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Guiot HM, Franqui-Rivera H. Predicting performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge using results from previous examinations. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018;14(9):943–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Tsai S, Sun M, Asbury ML, Weber JM, Truong T, Deans E. Novel spaced repetition flashcard system for the in-training examination for obstetrics and gynecology. Med Sci Educ. 2021; ePub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01344-5.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Neva Howard for providing input on the content of the survey instrument.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mr. Lu, Mr. Farhat, and Dr. Beck Dallaghan actively participated in the conception and design of the study along with analysis and interpretation of the data. Each author contributed to the preparation of the manuscript and has approved the final submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary L. Beck Dallaghan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board.

Consent to Participate

Participants provided consent when they agreed to complete the survey instrument.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 29 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, M., Farhat, J.H. & Beck Dallaghan, G.L. Enhanced Learning and Retention of Medical Knowledge Using the Mobile Flash card Application Anki. Med.Sci.Educ. 31, 1975–1981 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01386-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Anki
  • USMLE Step 1
  • Spaced retrieval
  • Medical students
  • Flash cards