Student opinions are important to improve the physiotherapy and rehabilitation curriculum, and to maintain the quality of education. This study aimed to evaluate the students’ perception levels related to anatomy education in terms of electrotherapy lectures. Third and fourth-year physiotherapy students (61 female, 43 male) have voluntarily participated in this study. The data were obtained by a survey, which consists of 29 closed-ended (15 Likert-type questions) questions. The average age was 21.82 ± 1.62 years. The grade point average of the participants, which is based on the 4-point scale, is 2.33 ± 0.44 points. There was no difference between the genders in terms of the grade point averages (p = 0.78). Students stated that the anatomy knowledge of the musculoskeletal system is extremely important in terms of electrotherapy lectures. This is followed by the nervous system and the circulatory system, respectively. They also stated that they need more anatomy knowledge during motor point stimulation applications (50%), and less anatomy knowledge during ultrasound applications (15.38%). In the results of Likert-type survey, first and second highest scores were pertained to “I need anatomy knowledge when inserting electrodes” and “The knowledge which is obtained from anatomy lectures affect to the motor nerve stimulations” (1.42 ± 0.67 and 1.40 ± 0.66, respectively, p < 0.05) and the least score was pertained to “I need to look at my anatomy notes before the electrotherapy exams” (0.41 ± 0.88, p < 0.05). The results from this study help to enhance our conceptual understanding of students’ perception levels of anatomy education importance in terms of electrotherapy lectures.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Salian SC, Singh J. Perception of recent physiotherapy graduates regarding electrotherapy in undergraduate curriculum content. Int J Physiother Res. 2016;4(2):1468–75.
Watson T. The role of electrotherapy in contemporary physiotherapy practice. Manualtherapy. 2000;5(3):132–41.
Ocak MA, Topal AD. Blended learning in anatomy education: a study investigating medical students’ perceptions. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2015;11(3):647–83.
McLachlan JC, Patten D. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Med Educ. 2006;40(3):243–53.
Shead D, Roos R, Olivier B, Ihunwo AO. Opinions of South African physiotherapists on gross anatomy education for physiotherapy students. S Afr J Physiother. 2019;75(1):1–10.
Díaz-Fernández Á, Jiménez-Delgado JJ, Osuna-Pérez MC, Rueda-Ruiz A, Paulano-Godino F. Development and implementation of a mobile application to improve university teaching of electrotherapy. International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication, Technologies and Learning. 2016; 33–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCTL.2016.7753766
Arasil T, Kayhan Ö. The status of rehabilitation in Turkey. Disabil Rehabil. 1997;19(9):379–81.
Forgey SB, Williams MR, Pribesh S. Pathways to success in anatomy and physiology at the community college: the role of prerequisite courses. Community Coll Enterp. 2020;26(1):9–26.
Fink A. The survey handbook. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2003.
Gürses HN, Alemdaroğlu İ, Tanriverdi M. Türkiye’de Fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon fakülte bölümü/yüksekokullarinin incelenmesi ve müfredat analizi. Türk Fiz Rehab Derg. 2014;25(1):3.
Kocamaz D, Yakut H, Özberk S. Patients’ satisfaction with and awareness of electrical stimulation therapy. Physiother Q. 2020;28(1):11–5.
Skovholt K. Anatomy of a teacher–student feedback encounter. Teach Teach Educ. 2018;69:142–53.
Penny AR. Changing the agenda for research into students’ views about university teaching: four shortcomings of SRT research. Teach in High Educ. 2003;8(3):399–411.
Turhan B. Physiotherapy and rehabilitation students’ opinions on anatomy education: a cross-sectional survey study. Physiother Q. 2020;28(2):46–51.
Botter A, Oprandi G, Lanfranco F, Allasia S, Maffiuletti NA, Minetto MA. Atlas of the muscle motor points for the lower limb: implications for electrical stimulation procedures and electrode positioning. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(10):2461.
Klement BJ, Paulsen DF, Wineski LE. Anatomy as the backbone of an integrated first year medical curriculum: design and implementation. Anat Sci Educ. 2011;4(3):157–69.
Otag I, Otag A. Students’ opinions on human anatomy and physiology. Cumhuriyet Int J Educ. 2013;2(3):39–45.
Adamczyk JG, Boguszewski D, Debrzak-Adamczyk I, Ochal A. Opinie fizjoterapeutów na temat przygotowania przez uczelnie do pracy w zawodzie. Physiotherapy/Fizjoterapia. 2012;20(3):41–9.
Kızıl H, Şendir M. Innovative approaches in nursing education. J Hum Sci. 2019;16(1):118–25.
Williams CA. Nurse educators meet your new students: generation Z. Nurse Educ. 2019;44(2):59–60.
Balogun JA, Aka P, Balogun AO, Obajuluwa VA. A phenomenological investigation of the first two decades of university-based physiotherapy education in Nigeria. Cogent Med. 2017;4(1):2–18.
Turhan B, Özbay Y. Erken çocukluk eğitimi ve nöroplastisite. Uluslararası Erken Çocukluk Eğitimi Çalışmaları Derg. 2016;1(2):54–63.
Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Turhan, B., Kocamaz, D. Importance of Anatomy Education on Electrotherapy Lectures in Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Curricula: Student Perceptions of a Foundation University. Med.Sci.Educ. 31, 1669–1675 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01358-z
- Anatomy education
- Basic science
- Physiotherapy education
- Student perception