Skip to main content

Understanding Excellence: a Qualitative Analysis of High-Performing Learner Study Strategies

Abstract

Introduction

Remediation in medical education tends to focus on the struggling learner. However, understanding successful learners may provide valuable insights to problematic academic behavior. This study explored core study strategies reported by high-performing medical school students.

Method

In the Fall of 2018 and 2019, high-performing first- and second-year medical students, defined as those who had performed over 90% on a national standardized assessment, were requested via e-mail to describe the study strategies that they believe contributed to their success. Student responses were analyzed using a template-driven approach, which drew upon common frameworks from cognitive learning theory.

Results

Thirty-seven high-performing students provided brief unstructured descriptions of their study strategies. Retrieval practice—the cognitive learning strategy of attempting to draw out information to active recall, typically through means of self-quizzing, practice questions, or flashcards—was the most commonly endorsed strategy, followed by spaced repetition. Use of outside commercial resources was commonly referenced, and approximately one-third endorsed a perception that some form of regularly practiced self-care contributed to their academic success.

Discussion

Retrieval practice, particularly combined with some form of spaced repetition, is often attributed as contributing to the success of high-performing learners. The use of commercial resources bears further exploration and consideration. Finally, the finding that self-care was identified as a contribution to academic performance goes beyond a focus on self-care solely for medical student well-being. This is an important distinction for both medical education and future research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Data Availability

Data is stored at the Uniformed Services University by the corresponding author and is available upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    Holland C. Critical review: medical students’ motivation after failure. Adv Health Scie Educ Theory Pract. 2016;21:695–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Saks N, Rashid H, Lebeau R. A national survey of US medical schools: current status of academic support. Oral presentation at: Association of American Medical Colleges Annual Meeting; Nov, 2016; Seattle, WA.

  3. 3.

    Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges and American Medical Association; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kalet A, Chou CL, editors. Remediation in medical education. New York, NY: Springer; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT. Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013;14:4–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ormond JE. Human learning. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bennion LD, Durning SJ, LaRochelle J, Yoon M, Schreiber-Gregory D, Reamy BV, Torre D. Untying the Gordian knot: remediation problems in medical schools that need remediation. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Burk-Rafel J, Santen SA, Purkiss J. Study behaviors and USMLE Step 1 performance: implications of a student self-directed parallel curriculum. Acad Med. 2017;92(11S):S67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Deng F, Gluckstein JA, Larsen DP. Student-directed retrieval practice is a predictor of medical licensing examination performance. Perspectives on medical education. 2015;4(6):308–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fetter M, Robbs R, Cianciolo AT. Clerkship curriculum design and USMLE Step 2 performance: Exploring the impact of self-regulated exam preparation. Med Sci Educ. 2019;29(1):265–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Piza F, Kesselheim JC, Perzhinsky J, Drowos J, Gillis R, Moscovici K, et al. Awareness and usage of evidence-based learning strategies among health professions students and faculty. Med Teach. 2019;41:1411–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Todres M, Tsimtsiou Z, Sidhu K, Stephenson A, Jones R. Medical students’ perceptions of the factors influencing their academic performance: an exploratory interview study with high-achieving and re-sitting medical students. Med Teach. 2012;34:e3252–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gonullu I, Artar M. Metacognition in medical education. Educ Health. 2014;27:225–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Dweck CS. Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    McGaghie WC, Downing SM, Kubilius R. What is the impact of commercial test preparation courses on medical examination performance? Teach Learn Med. 2004;2:202–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Liaw W, Eden A, Coffman M, Nagarj M, Bazemore AW. Factors associated with successful research departments: a qualitative analysis of family medicine research bright spots. Fam Med. 2019;51:87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    The Learning Scientists. learningscientists.org. https://www.learningscientists.org/ Accessed 2 March 2020.

  18. 18.

    Pavlov IP. Conditioned reflexes. London: Oxford University Press; 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Piaget J. Origins of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Weinstein Y, Sumeracki M, Caviglioli O. Understanding how we learn: a visual guide. Abingdon: Routledge; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hart-Matyas M, Taylor A, Lee HJ, Maclean MA, Hui A, Macleod A. Twelve tips for medical students to establish a collaborative flashcard project. Med Teach. 2019;41:505–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Martinelli SM, Isaak RS, Schell RM, Mitchell JD, McEvoy MD, Chen F. Learners and luddites in the twenty-first century: bringing evidenced-based education to anesthesiology. Anesthesiology. 2019;131:908–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Maslow AH. A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev. 1943;50:370–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ayala EE, Winseman JS, Johnsen RD, Mason HRC. U.S. medical students who engage in self-care report less stress and higher quality of life. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:189.

  25. 25.

    Brymer M, Jacobs A, Layne C, Pynoos R, Ruzek J, Steinberg A, et al. Psychological first aid: field operations guide (2nd Edition). White River Junction, VT: National Child Traumatic Stress Network and National Center for PTSD; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    LaDonna A, Taylor T, Lingard L. Why open-ended survey questions are unlikely to support rigorous qualitative insights. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):347–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bennion LD, Torre D, Durning SJ, Mears D, Schreiber-Gregory D, Servey JT, Cruess DF, Yoon M, Dong T. Early identification of struggling learners: using pre-matriculation and early academic performance data. Perspect Med Educ. 2019;8:298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bauer D, Kopp V, Fischer MR. Answer changing in multiple choice assessment change that answer when in doubt – and spread the word! BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan R. Landoll.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Disclaimer

This article was authored by employees of the US government. The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University or the Department of Defense.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Landoll, R.R., Bennion, L.D. & Maggio, L.A. Understanding Excellence: a Qualitative Analysis of High-Performing Learner Study Strategies. Med.Sci.Educ. 31, 1101–1108 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01279-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Medical education
  • Remediation
  • High-performing learners
  • Academic success