Gregory SR, Cole TR. The changing role of dissection in medical education. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002;287:1180–1.
Ghosh SK. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st Century. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10:286–99.
Clark RM, Kaw A. Adaptive learning in a numerical methods course for engineers: evaluation in blended and flipped classrooms. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 2020;28:62–79.
Fazal M, Panzano B, Luk K. Evaluating the Impact of blended learning: a mixed-methods study with difference-in-difference analysis. TechTrends. 2020;64:70–8.
Phillips A, Pane JF, Reumann-Moore R, Shenbanjo O. Implementing an adaptive intelligent tutoring system as an instructional supplement. Etr&D-Educational Technology Research and Development. 2020;68:1409–37.
Saric-Grgic I, Grubisic A, Seric L, Robinson TJ. Student clustering Based on learning behavior data in the intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies. 2020;18:73–89.
Sharma N, Iain D, Dong C. Adaptive learning in medical education: The final piece of technology enhanced learning? Ulster Med J. 2017;86:198–200.
Bransford JD, Brown AL, Academy N, Press W, D.C. . How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school; 1999.
German A, Gallego T. Adaptive, active and collaborative learning through blended learning. In: Chova LG, Martinez AL, Torres IC, eds. Edulearn16: 8th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 2016; 1750–1760.
Hernandez Y, Ramirez MP. Adaptive and blended learning for electrical operators training with virtual reality systems; 2016.
Tashiro J, Hebeler A. An adaptive blended learning health education model for families of a parent with serious medical problems. In: Cheung SKS, Lee LK, Simonova I, Kozel T, Kwok LF, eds. Blended learning: Educational innovation for personalized learning, Icbl 2019, 2019; 59–71.
Wangwattana B, Lertnattee V. Adaptive content development for blended Learning in microscopic of herbal medicines. In: Cheung SKS, Lee LK, Simonova I, Kozel T, Kwok LF, eds. Blended learning: Educational innovation for personalized learning, Icbl 2019, 2019; 137–148.
Jameson DG, Hobsley M, Ohanlon P, Buckton S. Real-time interactivity on the SuperJANET network. Interact Comput. 1996;8:285–96.
Marchevsky AM, Relan A, Baillie S. Self-instructional, “virtual pathology” laboratories using web-based technology enhance medical school teaching of pathology. Hum Pathol. 2003;34:423–9.
McCutcheon K, Lohan M, Traynor M, Martin D. A systematic review evaluating the impact of online or blended learning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduate nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2015;71:255–270.
Brechtel L, Womack L, Ubah C, et al. Early Clinical experience in a year one medical neuroscience course enhances students’ performance. Medical Science Educator. 2018;2:315–26.
Brechtel L, Wormack L, Frazier A, et al. Middle school students: active learning activities for stroke education and healthy lifestyles. J Child Fam Stud. 2019;28:1955–64.
Isayeva O, Shumylo M, Khmilyar I, Myskiv I, Mylyk O. Blended learning in higher medical education: principles and strategies of teaching foreign languages. Advanced Education. 2020:11–18.
Micheal S, Marjadi B. Blended learning to teach gender in medical school. Clinical Teacher. 2018;15:208–13.
Swito YS, Koesoema AP, Pribadi A. Development of a blended and eLearningc course on anatomy and physiology for engineers in Indonesia: Lessons learned and future developments. In: Lhotska L, Sukupova L, Lackovic I, Ibbott GS, eds. World congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering 2018, Vol 1, 2019; 881–884.
Brown MG. Blended instructional practice: a review of the empirical literature on instructors’ adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. Internet and Higher Education. 2016;31:1–10.
Bates AW. Teaching in the digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Vancouver Tony Bates Associates; 2015.
Graham CR. Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). New York, NY: Routledge. New York Routledge; 2013.
Protsiv M, Atkins S, Consortium A. The experiences of lecturers in African, Asian and European universities in preparing and delivering blended health research methods courses: a qualitative study. Global Health Action. 2016;9.
Ramklass SS. The transition from traditional lectures to blended learning: piloting of an e-learning research methods module for postgraduate medical studentS. In: Chova LG, Martinez AL, Torres IC, eds. Edulearn14: 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 2014; 400–404.
Saupe JL. Some useful estimates of the kuder-richardson formula number-20 reliability coefficient. Educ Psychol Measur. 1961;21:63–71.
Zimmerman DW, Burkheimer GJ. Coefficient alpha, test reliability, and heterogeneity of score distributions. Journal of Experimental Education. 1968;37:90–5.
Mattick K, Knight L. The importance of vocational and social aspects of approaches to learning for medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2009;14:629–44.
Meguid EMA, Khalil MK. Measuring medical students’ motivation to learning anatomy by cadaveric dissection. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10:363–71.
Mak-van der Vossen M, Teherani A, van Mook W, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA. Investigating US medical students' motivation to respond to lapses in professionalism. Medical Education. 2018;52:838–850.
Barte JCM, Nieuwenhuys A, Geurts SAE, Kompier MAJ. Motivation counteracts fatigue-induced performance decrements in soccer passing performance. J Sports Sci. 2019;37:1189–96.
Groening C, Binnewies C. “Achievement unlocked!”—the impact of digital achievements as a gamification element on motivation and performance. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;97:151–66.
Hangen EJ, Elliot AJ, Jamieson JP. Highlighting the difference between approach and avoidance motivation enhances the predictive validity of performance-avoidance goal reports. Motivation and Emotion. 2019;43:387–99.
Jimenez EJB, Villegas JYV, Panduro JVR. The methodologies, intrinsic motivation and performance of the students of the Faculty of Education of the UNMSM. Dilemas Contemporaneos-Educacion Politica Y Valores. 2019;6.
Law KMY, Geng S, Li TM. Student enrollment, motivation and learning performance in a blended learning environment: the mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Comput Educ. 2019;136:1–12.
Wenzel AK, Krause TA, Vogel D. Making performance pay work: the impact of transparency, participation, and fairness on controlling perception and intrinsic motivation. Review of public personnel administration. 2019;39:232–55.
Zou JH, Liu K, Han LL. The impact of a rich media platform to table tennis learners' performance and participation motivation. Interactive Learning Environments.
Branzetti J, Gisondi MA, Hopson LR, Regan L. Aiming beyond competent: the application of the taxonomy of significant learning to medical education. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31:466–78.
Carney PA, Mejicano GC, Bumsted T, Quirk M. Assessing learning in the adaptive curriculum. Med Teach. 2018;40:813–9.
Hudder A, Tackett S, Moscatello K. First-year experience Implementing an adaptive learning platform for first- and second-year medical students at the Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2019;119:51–8.
Wang YP, Han XB, Yang J. Revisiting the blended learning literature: using a complex adaptive systems framework. Educational technology & society. 2015;18:380–93.
Wickremaratne J, Wimalaratne G, Goonetilleke V, Ieee. A blend of adaptive and digital learning towards language proficiency; 2008.
Ferreira P, Gomes TT, Severo M, Ferreira MA. Assessment of the effect of digital education interventions in medical education. In: Chova LG, Martinez AL, Torres IC, eds. Iceri2014: 7th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, 2014; 3655–3663.
Harden RM. The virtual learning enviroment in medical education—past, present and future; 2010.
Muhsin HK, Ieee. The using of E-learning techniques to improve the medical education; 2008.
Taveira-Gomes T, Saffarzadeh A, Severo M, Guimaraes MJ, Ferreira MA. A novel collaborative e-learning platform for medical students—ALERT STUDENT. Bmc Medical Education. 2014;14.
Trukhacheva N, Pupyrev N. Blended Learning strategy in the altay state medical university. In: Blobel B, Engelbrecht R, Shifrin MA, eds. Large Scale Projects in Ehealth: Partnership in Modernization, 2012; 72–75.
Greving S, Lenhard W, Richter T. Adaptive retrieval practice with multiple-choice questions in the university classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
Wade SWT, Moscova M, Tedla N, et al. Adaptive tutorials versus web-based resources in radiology: a mixed methods analysis of efficacy and engagement in senior medical students. Acad Radiol. 2019;26:1421–31.
Hyll M, Schvarcz R, Manninen K. Exploring how medical students learn with the help of a digital presentation: a qualitative study. Bmc Medical Education. 2019;19.
Lakhal S, Mukamurera J, Bedard ME, Heilporn G, Chauret M. Features fostering academic and social integration in blended synchronous courses in graduate programs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2020;17.
Regmi K, Jones L. A systematic review of the factors—enablers and barriers—affecting e-learning in health sciences education. Bmc Medical Education. 2020;20.
Leichnetz GR. Digital neuroanatomy:. In: Leichnetz GR (Editor). Richmond, 2006.