Advertisement

Medical Science Educator

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 483–488 | Cite as

Examining Unprofessional Behavior in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship: a Qualitative Study of Essays Written by Students

  • Katie Lackritz
  • Andrea Braverman
  • Abigail Wolf
  • Brooke Gaspari
  • Maheen Rana
Original Research

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the medical student perception of unprofessional experiences on the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship through evaluation of reflective essays using qualitative research and grounded theory.

Methods

All third year medical students rotating through OBGYN were required to write an essay on an experience they had with positive and/or negative professionalism during their clinical rotation. Essays were analyzed from a total of 220 students and coded into eight domains with subcategories. Inter-rater reliability was established with two of the coders (MR and BG) with high levels of correlation kappa’s agreement 0.73 CI (0.57, 0.88). Qualitative analysis using grounded theory was deployed for essay theme analysis. Frequencies were used for descriptive purposes.

Results

Most students chose to write about incidents of negative professionalism that they observed. The most common domain themes were medical team dynamics (19%), inpatient interactions (20%), and inappropriate remarks about a patient (16%). A quarter (26%) of the essays also included an observation of a positive demonstration of professionalism.

Conclusion

Students frequently report experiencing mistreatment through the perception of a hostile learning environment. The essays described frequent exposure to unprofessional actions that can create a hostile learning environment and thus potential mistreatment. The students frequently wrote about witnessing unprofessional comments made by team members about patients, residents, and other students. All medical educators need to work to reduce student mistreatment through reducing unprofessional behavior.

Keywords

Obstetrics Gynecology CLerkship Professionalism Qualitative Essays 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all students who rotate through the Obstetrics and Gynecology clerkship; they have been our educators through sharing their experiences.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The Thomas Jefferson University Institutional Review Board approved this study of de-identified essays with a designation of exempt.

Source of the Work

Essays gathered from clerkship students at Thomas Jefferson University

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Holden M, Buck E, Clark M, Szauter K, Trumble J. Professional identity formation in medical education: the convergence of multiple domains. HEC Forum. 2012;24:245–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-012-9197-6.
  2. 2.
    Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, Brainard G, Herrine SK, Isenberg GA, et al. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009;84:1182–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feudtner C, Christakis DA, Christakis NA. Do clinical clerks suffer ethical erosion? Students’ perceptions of their ethical environment and personal development. Acad Med. 1994;69:670–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Satterwhite RC, Satterwhite WM, Enarson C. An ethical paradox: the effect of unethical conduct on medical students’ values. J Med Ethics. 2000;26:462–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caldicott CV, Faber-Langendoen K. Deception, discrimination, and fear of reprisal: lessons in ethics from third-year medical students. Acad Med. 2005;80:866–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dwyer J. Primum non tacere, an ethics of speaking up. Hastings Cent Rep. 1994;24:13–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burack JH, Irby DM, Carline JD, Root RK, Larson EB. Teaching compassion and respect, attending physicians’ responses to problematic behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:49–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clever SL, Edwards KA, Feudtner C, Braddock CH. Ethics and communication, does students’ comfort addressing ethical issues vary by specialty team? J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:560–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Charon R. Narrative and medicine. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:862–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shapiro J, Kasman D, Shafer A. Words and wards: a model of reflective writing and its uses in medical education. J Med Humanit. 2006;27:231–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baernstein A, Fryer-Edwards K. Promoting reflection on professionalism: a comparison trial of educational interventions for medical students. Acad Med. 2003;78:742–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Branch WT. Use of critical incident reports in medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:1063–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cohn FG, Shapiro J, Lie DA, Boker J, Stephens F, Leung LA. Interpreting values conflicts experienced by obstetrics-gynecology clerkship students using reflective writing. Acad Med. 2009;84:587–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fins JJ, Gentilesco BJ, Carver A, Lister P, Acres CA, Payne R, et al. Reflective practice and palliative care education: a clerkship responds to the informal and hidden curricula. Acad Med. 2003;78:307–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frank E, Carrera JS, Stratton T, Bickel J, Nora LM. Experiences of belittlement and harassment and their correlates among medical students in the United States: longitudinal study. BMJ. 2006;333:682.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38924.722037.7C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christakis DA, Feudtner C. The ethical consequences of transient social relationships in medical training. JAMA. 1997;278:739–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, (NJ): Aldine Transaction; 1967.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Association of American Medical Colleges. Graduation questionnaire. 2017 Available at: http://www.aamc.org/data/gq/Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Medical Science Educators 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katie Lackritz
    • 1
  • Andrea Braverman
    • 1
  • Abigail Wolf
    • 1
  • Brooke Gaspari
    • 2
  • Maheen Rana
    • 1
  1. 1.Thomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Lankenau Medical CenterWynnewoodUSA

Personalised recommendations