Skip to main content
Log in

Training Students to Answer Layman’s Questions Also Helps in Retention of Scientific Content

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report a curricular exercise with two principal goals: (a) training medical students to integrate several key elements derived from basic science content to answer patient’s question and (b) enhancing students’ understanding and retention of scientific content. In this assignment, students are presented with a scenario in which a hypothetical patient asks the question, “Hey, Doc, can I safely eat the genetically modified salmon?” The students are expected to construct a cogent and succinct response, applying principles learned in class to address the question posed by the patient. In order to determine whether completion of the homework assignment enhanced the students’ understanding and retention of scientific content, performance on pre- and post-exercise examinations were compared on (a) “project” questions that tested key concepts reinforced by the assignment and (b) “control” questions that tested concepts covered in class but not explicitly reinforced by the exercise. We found that the degree of difficulty for the control questions increased by about 15% over a period of 1 month while the degree of difficulty for the project questions held steady over the same period. These results suggest that the assignment aided students in internalizing key concepts, transferring them from temporarily memorized knowledge to longer-term ideas that could be applied to new problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams NE. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015;103(3):152–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aleven VAWMM, Koedinger KR. An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cogn Sci. 2002;26:147–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson L, Krathwohl DA. Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berardi-Coletta B, Buyer LS, Dominowsky RL, Rellinger ER. Metacognition and problem-solving: a process-oriented approach. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995;21:205–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bielaczyc K, Pirolli PL, Brown AL. Training in self-explanation and self-regulation strategies: investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cogn Instr. 1995;13:221–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chi MTH, deLeeuw N, Chiu MH, Lavancher C. Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cogn Sci. 1994;18:439–77.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D’Eon MF. Knowledge loss of medical students on first year basic science courses at the University of Saskatchewan. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferguson-Hessler MGM, de Jong T. Studying physics texts: differences in study processes between good and poor performers. Cogn Instr. 1990;7:41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hawkins RE, Welcher CM, Holmboe ES, Kirk LM, Norcini JJ, Simons KB, Skochelak SE. Implementation of competency-based medical education: are we addressing the concerns and challenges? Med Educ. 2015;49:1086–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lazic E, Dujmovic J, Hren D. Retention of basic sciences knowledge at clinical years of medical curriculum. Croat Med J. 2006;47:882–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee HS, Anderson JR. Student learning: what has instruction got to do with it? Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:445–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rico E, Galindo J, Marset P. Remembering biochemistry: a study of the patterns of loss of biochemical knowledge in medical students. Biochem Educ. 1981;9:100–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rumsey DJ. Statistics for dummies. 2nd edn, Wiley; 2011. http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/how-to-compare-two-population-proportions.html.

  14. Smith MK, Wood WB, Adams WK, Wieman C, Knight JK, Guild N, Su TT. Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science. 2009;323:122–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. US Food and Drug Administration. 2010. FDA veterinary medicine advisory committee briefing packet AquAdvantage Salmon: FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine, Rockville.

  16. van Eenennaam AL, Muir WM. Transgenic salmon: a final leap to the grocery shelf? Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(8):706–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van Mariënboer JJ, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ. 2010;44:85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yaskowiak ES, Shears MA, Agarwal-Mawal A, Fletcher GL. Characterization and multi-generational stability of the growth hormone transgene (EO-1a) responsible for enhanced growth rates in Atlantic salmon. Transgenic Res. 2006;15(4):465–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Drs. Martha Faner, Carol Wilkins, Shawna Nantais, and John Wang for their help in the development of this exercise and Dr. John Wang for his help in grading essays and for critical review of this manuscript. This work has been supported by the Dr. Ruth M. Allen Endowed Fund for Medical Education to the Office of Medical Education Research and Development, College of Human Medicine, and by the Office of Academic Programs in the College of Osteopathic Medicine at Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jana M. Simmons.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The Michigan State University Institutional Review Board on Human Subjects has approved these studies (IRB numbers x13-813e and i044320).

Notes on Contributors

Jana M. Simmons earned her Ph.D. in biochemistry and a Certificate in College Teaching in 2010 and is now an Assistant Professor in the College of Human Medicine at Michigan State University. Her main focus is effective integration of basic sciences into clinically driven curricula.

Raquel P. Ritchie earned her Ph.D. in molecular biology and genetics in 2007 and did post-doctoral research in stem cell biology. She is now an Assistant Professor in the College of Osteopathic Medicine at Michigan State University. Her main focus is multidisciplinary approaches to medical education.

Electronic supplementary material

Appendix A

(PDF 111 kb)

Appendix B

(PDF 327 kb)

Appendix C

(PDF 245 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simmons, J.M., Ritchie, R.P. Training Students to Answer Layman’s Questions Also Helps in Retention of Scientific Content. Med.Sci.Educ. 27, 33–39 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0357-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0357-1

Keywords

Navigation