Skip to main content
Log in

Differential Acceptance of Genomic Medicine Approaches Between Future and Practicing Physicians

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To introduce medical students at Boston University School of Medicine to the complexities of genomic testing approaches, students were presented information on the scientific and ethical foundations of genomic medicine and were then asked to apply these principles to a controversial case. Medical student and New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) reader responses to a hypothetical case of an adult seeking genomic testing to explore his personal cancer risk were compared. The responses revealed that future physicians are significantly more inclined than NEJM readers to embrace genomic approaches in response to a case of an asymptomatic patient seeking genomic testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. McCarthy JJ, McLeod HL, Ginsburg GS. Genomic medicine: a decade of successes, challenges, and opportunities. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(189):189sr4. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3005785.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Collins FC, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:793–5. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1500523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Green ED, Guyer MS. Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside. Nature. 2011;470(7333):204–13. doi:10.1038/nature09764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guttmacher AE, Porteous ME, McInerney JD. Educating health-care professionals about genetics and genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8(2):151–7. doi:10.1038/nrg2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Demmer LA, Waggoner DJ.  Professional medical education and genomics.  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2014;15:507-516. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-090413-025522.

  6. Houwink EJ, van Luijk SJ, Henneman L, van der Vleuten C, Jan Dinant G, Cornel MC. Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12(1):5. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-12-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rinke ML, Mikat-Stevens N, Saul R, Driscoll A, Healy J, Tarini BA. Genetic services and attitudes in primary care pediatrics. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A(2):449–55. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.36339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Selkirk CG, Weissman SM, Anderson A, Hulick PJ. Physicians’ preparedness for integration of genomic and pharmacogenetic testing into practice within a major healthcare system. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013;17(3):219–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Powell KP, Cogswell WA, Christianson CA, et al. Primary care physicians’ awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. J Genet Couns. 2012;21(1):113–26. doi:10.1007/s10897-011-9390-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haga SB, Burke W, Ginsburg GS, Mills R, Agans R. Primary care physicians’ knowledge of and experience with pharmacogenetic testing. Clin Genet. 2012;82(4):388–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Plunkett-Rondeau J, Hyland K, Dasgupta S. Training future physicians in the era of genomic medicine: trends in undergraduate medical genetics education. Genet Med. 2015. doi:10.1038/gim.2014.208.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schulte J, Rothaus CS, Adler JN, Phimister EG. Screening an asymptomatic person for genetic risk—polling results. N Engl J Med. 2014. doi:10.1056/NEJMclde1411151.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burke W, Dimmock D. Screening an asymptomatic person for genetic risk. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2442-2445. doi:10.1056/NEJMclde1311959.

  14. Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, Kalia SS, Korf BR, Martin CL, et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013;15:565–74. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shoumita Dasgupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dasgupta, S. Differential Acceptance of Genomic Medicine Approaches Between Future and Practicing Physicians. Med.Sci.Educ. 25, 233–236 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0146-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0146-2

Keywords

Navigation