Skip to main content

The foucauldian approach to conservation: pitfalls and genuine promises

Abstract

Conservation biology is a branch of ecology devoted to conserving biodiversity. Because this discipline is based on the assumption that knowledge should guide actions, it endows experts with a power that should be questioned. The work of the French philosopher Michel Foucault (1926–1984) can be seen as a relevant conceptual resource to think these aspects of conservation biology through. I critically analyse the relevance of the Foucauldian approach to conservation. I argue that Foucauldian arguments are deeply ambiguous, and therefore useless for conservation purposes, unless they are supplemented with unsaid assumptions that are, depending on the case at hand, untenable, or at least at odds with basic assumptions underlying conservation biology. In any case, the prospects of using the Foucauldian approach for conservation purposes are deeply undermined. However, the Foucauldian reasoning contains some ideas that can be important and useful for conservation purposes, if they are duly clarified.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Literature cited

  • Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Duke University Press

  • Baron, M., Pettit, P., & Slote, M. (1997). Three methods of ethics: A debate. Blackwell

  • Biermann, C., & Mansfield, B. (2014). Biodiversity, purity, and death: Conservation biology as biopolitics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(2), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13047p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouveresse, J. (2016). Nietzsche contre Foucault: Sur la vérité, la connaissance et le pouvoir. Agone

  • Brown, W. (2007). Les habits neufs de la politique mondiale. Amsterdam

  • Büscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2019). Towards convivial conservation. Conservation & Society, 17(3), 283–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carolan, M. S., & Bell, M. M. (2003). In truth we trust: Discourse, phenomenology, and the social relations of knowledge in an environmental dispute. Environmental Values, 12(2), 225–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. (2020). Power in conservation: Environmental anthropology beyond political ecology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429324659

  • Courtine, J. F. (1990). Suarez et le système de la métaphysique (1. éd). Presses universitaires de France

  • Cusset, F. (2008). French theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. transformed the intellectual life of the United States. University of Minnesota Press

  • de Lagasnerie, G. (2012). La dernière leçon de Michel Foucault: Sur le néolibéralisme, la théorie et la politique. Fayard

  • Dearden, P. (2014).Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Marine Policy, 44,107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detienne, M. (1996). The masters of truth in Archaic Greece. MIT Press

  • Devictor, V., & Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2016). From ecological records to big data: The invention of global biodiversity. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 38(4)

  • Devictor, V. (2018). La prise en charge technoscientifique de la crise de la biodiversité [Phdthesis]. Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - Paris I

  • Devictor, V., & Meinard, Y. (2019). Empowering biodiversity knowledge. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djoghlaf, A., Dodds, F. (2011). Biodiversity and ecosystem insecurity. A planet in peril. Routledge

  • Dreyfus, H., Rabinow, P. Eds. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. 2nd Edition. The University of Chicago Press

  • Fairhead, J., & Leach, M. (1996). Misreading the African landscape: Society and ecology in a forest-savanna mosaic. Cambridge University Press

  • Falzon, C., O’Leary, T., & Sawicki, J. (2013). A companion to Foucault. Wiley-Blackwell. (Éds.)

  • Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses. Gallimard

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon Books

  • Foucault, M. (1976). Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique. Gallimard

  • Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books

  • Foucault, M. (1993). L’ordre du discours. Gallimard

  • Foucault, M. (1994). Histoire de la sexualité, tome 3: HLe souci de soi. Gallimard

  • Foucault, M. (2003a). Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974–1975. Picador

  • Foucault, M. (2003b). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76. Picador

  • Foucault, M. (2005). The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981-82. Palgrave-Macmillan

  • Foucault, M. (2006). Psychiatric power: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1973-74. Palgrave Macmillan

  • Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. Palgrave Macmillan

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79. Palgrave Macmillan

  • Foucault, M. (2011). Leçons sur la volonté de savoir. Gallimard/Seuil

  • Foucault, M. (2015). The punitive society: Lectures at the Collège de France 1972–1973. Palgrave Macmillan

  • Foucault, M. (2019). Penal theories and institutions: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1971–1972. Palgrave Macmillan

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Volume I: An introduction. Pantheon Books

  • Ferguson, J. (1990). The anti-politics machine: “Development”, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge University Press

  • Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (1st American ed). Pantheon Books

  • Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus, & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 2nd ed., (pp. 208–226). University of Chicago

  • Gibbons, P., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2007). Offsets for land clearing: No net loss or the tail wagging the dog? Ecological Management & Restoration, 8(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2007.00328.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, R. (1995). Green imperialism: Colonial expansion, tropical island Edens, and the orgins of environmentalism, 1600–1860. Cambridge University Press

  • Habermas, J. (1988). Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: Zwölf Vorlesungen. Suhrkamp Insel

  • Honneth, A. (1985). Kritik der Macht: Reflexionsstufen einer kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie. Suhrkamp

  • Jones, D. (2019). Conservation politics | Ecology and conservation. Cambridge University Press

  • Justus, J., Colyvan, M., Regan, H., & Maguire, L. (2009). Buying into conservation: Intrinsic versus instrumental value. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(4), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiik, L. (2019). Conservationland: Toward the anthropology of professionals in global nature conservation. Critique of Anthropology, 39(4), 391–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X18821177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopnina, H., & Washington, H. (Eds.). (2020). Conservation. Integrating social and ecological justice. Springer

  • Lazar, S. (2004). Education for credit: Development as citizenship project in Bolivia. Critique of Anthropology, 24(3), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X04045423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lelièvre, M., Dehais, C., Jamault, R., Martin, M., Meinard, Y., Stenou, B., & Valladares, L. (2021). Etudes préalables et demande de labellisation en ENS et de classement en Arrêté de Protection de Biotopes de la zone humide « les Rochières—Les Herbages »—Rapport préparé pour le compte du Syndicat Mixte du Bassin de la Sorgue

  • Li, T. (2007). Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society 36(2): 263–293

  • Lougheed, S. C., Hird, M. J., & Rowe, K. R. (2016). Governing household waste management: An empirical analysis and critique. Environmental Values, 25(3), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327116X14598445991420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascia, M. B., Brosius, J. P., Dobson, T. A., Forbes, B. C., Horowitz, L., McKean, M. A., & Turner, N. J. (2003). Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology, 17(3), 649–650. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01738.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinard, Y. (2017). What is a legitimate conservation policy? Biological Conservation, 213(Part A), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.042

  • Putnam, H. (2004). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Harvard University Press

  • Runte, A. (2010). National parks: The American experience (Fourth edition). Taylor Trade Publishing

  • Sandbrook, C., Scales, I. R., Vira, B., & Adams, W. M. (2011). Value plurality among conservation professionals. Conservation Biology, 25, 285–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E. (1985). What is conservation biology? BioScience, 35(11), 727–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/1310054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, K. (2017). Conservation biopolitics and the sustainability episteme. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49(7)

  • Taylan, F. (2014). Gouverner les hommes par leurs milieux. La rationalité mésologique et les technologies environnementales du libéralisme. Chapitre 11 in Oulc’hen, H. (Ed). Usages de Foucault. Presses Universitaires de France

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Fontana Press

  • Williams, B. (2002). Truth & truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Princeton University Press

  • Youatt, R. (2008). Counting species: Biopower and the global biodiversity census. Environmental Values, 17(3), 393–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yves Meinard PhD.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meinard, Y. The foucauldian approach to conservation: pitfalls and genuine promises. HPLS 44, 25 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-022-00509-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-022-00509-8

Keywords

  • Conservation biology
  • Foucault
  • Power
  • Knowledge
  • Governmentality