Advertisement

All things bleak and bare beneath a brazen sky: practice and place in the analysis of Australopithecus

  • Paige MadisonEmail author
Original Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Shaping the History of the Paleosciences

Abstract

The fossilized primate skull known as the Taungs Baby, discovered in South Africa, was put forward in 1925 as a controversial ‘missing link’ between humans and apes. This essay examines the controversy generated by the fossil, with a focus on practice and the circulation of material objects. Viewing the Taungs story from this perspective provides a new outlook on debates, one that suggests that attention to the importance of place, particularly the ways that specific localities shape scientific practices, is crucial to understanding such controversies. During the 1920s, the fossil itself did not move or circulate from its South African location, a fact that raised methodological concerns in understanding its significance and drew immense criticism from a range of experts. Examining the criticisms regarding the fossil’s failure to circulate draws attention to the importance of centers of accumulation in the analysis of hominid fossils. Diverging from existing histories that primarily emphasize the role of theory in paleoanthropological debates, then, this article argues that scientific practice played an important role in the Taungs fossil controversy. Examining this dimension of the debates has broader implications for revealing the underlying imperial assumptions that guided hominid paleontology during the early twentieth century.

Keywords

Paleoanthropology Human evolution Fossils South Africa 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the John Templeton Foundation as well as the Center for Biology and Society, Arizona State University. Special thanks to Jane Maienschein, William Kimbel, and Michael Reidy for their guidance and feedback on various drafts. I am indebted to the editors of this issue, Kate MacCord and Elizabeth Dobson-Jones, for their comments, as well as to Christopher Dean for our thought-provoking discussions. Lastly, thank you to the reviewers for making this paper immeasurably better.

References

  1. Alberti, S. J. (2005). Objects and the museum. Isis, 96(4), 559–571.Google Scholar
  2. Bowler, P. J. (1986). Theories of human evolution: A century of debate, 1844–1944. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Broom, R. (1918). The evidence afforded by the Boskop skull of a new species of primitive man (Homo capensis). American Museum of Natural History, 32(2), 63–79.Google Scholar
  4. Broom, R. (1929a). Note on the milk dentition of Australopithecus. Journal of Zoology, 99(1), 85–88.Google Scholar
  5. Broom, R. (1929b). What the world owes to South Africa. Scientific American, 141, 119–121.Google Scholar
  6. Broom, R. (1950). Finding the missing link. London: Watts.Google Scholar
  7. Dart, R. A. (1923). Boskop remains from the south-east African coast. Nature, 112, 623–625.Google Scholar
  8. Dart, R. A. (1925). Australopithecus africanus: The man-ape of South Africa. Nature, 115, 195–199.Google Scholar
  9. Dart, R. A. (1934). The dentition of Australopithecus africanus. Folia Anatomica Japonica, 12(4), 207–221.Google Scholar
  10. Dart, R. A. (1959). Adventures with the missing link. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  11. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  12. Daston, L. (Ed.). (2000). Biographies of scientific objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Delisle, R. G. (2007). Debating humankind’s place in nature, 1860–2000: The nature of paleoanthropology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Dennell, R. W. (2001). From Sangiran to Olduvai, 1937–1960: The quest for ‘centres’ of hominid origins in Asia and Africa. In R. Corbey & W. Roeboek (Eds.), Studying human origins: Disciplinary history and epistemology (pp. 45–66). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Drell, J. R. (2000). Neanderthals: A history of interpretation. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 19(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  16. Dubow, S. (1996). Human origins, race typology and the other Raymond Dart. African Studies, 55(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
  17. Dubow, S. (2006). A commonwealth of knowledge: Science, sensibility, and white South Africa 1820–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Duckworth, W. L. H. (1925). The fossil anthropoid ape from Taungs. Nature, 115, 236.Google Scholar
  19. Elliot Smith, G. (1924). The evolution of man: Essays. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Elliot Smith, G. (1925a). The fossil anthropoid ape from Taungs. Nature, 115, 235.Google Scholar
  21. Elliot Smith, G. (1925b). Taungs fossil skull: More manlike than any known ape. The Times. In Grafton Elliot Smith Papers, University College London Archives.Google Scholar
  22. Endersby, J. (2008). Imperial nature: Joseph Hooker and the practices of Victorian science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Falk, D. (2011). The fossil chronicles: How two controversial discoveries changed our view of human evolution. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fan, F. T. (2007). Science in cultural borderlands: methodological reflections on the study of science, European imperialism, and cultural encounter. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 1(2), 213–231.Google Scholar
  25. Fan, F. T. (2013). Circulating material objects: The international controversy over antiquities and fossils in twentieth-century China. In B. Lightman & L. Stewart (Eds.), The circulation of knowledge between Britain, India and China: The early-modern world to the twentieth century (pp. 209–236). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  26. Goodrum, M. (2008). Dart, Raymond Arthur. Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 20, 237–242.Google Scholar
  27. Gundling, T. (2005). First in line: Tracing our ape ancestry. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hamilton, C., Mbenga, B., & Ross, R. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge history of South Africa (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hrdlička, A. (1923). Variation in the dimension of lower molars in man and anthropoid apes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 6, 195–216.Google Scholar
  30. Hrdlička, A. (1925). The Taungs ape. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 8(4), 379–392.Google Scholar
  31. Hrdlička, A. (1930). The skeletal remains of early man. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  32. Keith, A. (1925a). The fossil anthropoid ape from Taungs. Nature, 115, 234.Google Scholar
  33. Keith, A. (1925b). The Taungs skull. Nature, 116(July), 11.Google Scholar
  34. Keith, A. (1925c). The Taungs skull. Nature, 116(September), 462–463.Google Scholar
  35. Keith, A. (1947). Australopithecinæ or Dartians. Nature, 159, 377.Google Scholar
  36. Knight, D., & Sabey, A. (1984). The lion roars at Wembley. London: Barnard & Westwood.Google Scholar
  37. Kuljian, C. (2016). Darwin’s hunch: Science, race and the search for human origins. Johannesburg: Jacana Media.Google Scholar
  38. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lewin, R. (1997). Bones of contention: Controversies in the search for human origins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lightman, B., McOuat, G., & Stewart, L. (2013). The circulation of knowledge between Britain, India and China: The early-modern world to the twentieth century. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  41. Madison, P. (2016). The most brutal of human skulls: Measuring and knowing the first Neanderthal. The British Journal for the History of Science, 49(3), 411–432.Google Scholar
  42. Manias, C. (2015). Building Baluchitherium and Indricotherium: Imperial and international networks in early-twentieth century paleontology. Journal of the History of Biology, 48(2), 237–278.Google Scholar
  43. Manias, C. (2017a). Jesuit scientists and Mongolian fossils: The French paleontological missions in China, 1923–1928. Isis, 108(3), 307–332.Google Scholar
  44. Manias, C. (2017b). Robert Broom’s prehistoric sketches: Conveying objects through illustration in the early-twentieth century. Museum History Journal, 10(2), 162–182.Google Scholar
  45. Manias, C. (2018). Reconstructing an incomparable organism: The Chalicothere in nineteenth and early-twentieth century palaeontology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 40(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  46. Nair, S. P. (2005). Eyes and no eyes: Siwalik fossil collecting and the crafting of Indian palaeontology (1830–1847). Science in Context, 18(3), 359–392.Google Scholar
  47. Pietsch, T. (2013). Empire of scholars: Universities, networks and the British academic world, 1850–1939. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Podgorny, I. (2013). Fossil dealers, the practices of comparative anatomy and British diplomacy in Latin America, 1820–1840. The British Journal for the History of Science, 46(4), 647–674.Google Scholar
  49. Pyne, L. V. (2016). Seven skeletons: The evolution of the world’s most famous human fossils. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  50. Raj, K. (2007). Relocating modern science: Circulation and the construction of knowledge in South Asia and Europe, 1650–1900. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  51. Reader, J. (2011). Missing links: The hunt for earliest man. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  52. Richmond, J. (2009a). Design and dissent: Religion, authority, and the scientific spirit of Robert Broom. Isis, 100(3), 485–504.Google Scholar
  53. Richmond, J. (2009b). Experts and Australopithecines: Credibility and controversy in the science of human evolution, 19241959 (dissertation). https://escholarship.org/content/qt3zd1k4tk/qt3zd1k4tk.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2017.
  54. Rieppel, L. (2015). Plaster cast publishing in nineteenth-century paleontology. History of Science, 53(4), 456–491.Google Scholar
  55. Roberts, L. (2009). Situating science in global history: Local exchanges and networks of circulation. Itinerario, 33(1), 9–30.Google Scholar
  56. Rudwick, M. (2000). Georges Cuvier’s paper museum of fossil bones. Archives of Natural History, 27(1), 51–68.Google Scholar
  57. Rudwick, M. (2005). Bursting the limits of time: The reconstruction of geohistory in the age of revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Schiebinger, L. (2005). Forum introduction: The European colonial science complex. Isis, 96(1), 52–55.Google Scholar
  59. Secord, J. A. (2004). Knowledge in transit. Isis, 95(4), 654–672.Google Scholar
  60. Shapin, S. (1998). Placing the view from nowhere: Historical and sociological problems in the location of science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 23(1), 5–12.Google Scholar
  61. Shipman, P. (2002). The man who found the missing link: Eugene Dubois and his lifelong quest to prove Darwin right. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Sommer, M. (2007). Bones and ochre: The curious afterlife of the Red Lady of Paviland. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  63. South Africa believed the cradle of mankind, by Oscar Lazar. (1925). The Star. Raymond Dart Papers, University of Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  64. Spencer, F. (1984). The Neanderthals and their evolutionary significance: A brief historical survey. In Fred H. Smith & Frank Spencer (Eds.), Origins of modern humans: A World survey of the fossil evidence (pp. 1–49). New York: Alan Liss.Google Scholar
  65. Spencer, F. (1990). Piltdown: A scientific forgery. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Štrkalj, G., & Tobias, P. V. (2008). Raymond Dart as a pioneering primatologist. HOMO Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 59(4), 271–286.Google Scholar
  67. Tattersall, I. (1995). The fossil trail: How we know what we think we know about human evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Taungs man-ape: World keenly interested in news from Johannesburg. (1925, 5 February). The Star. In Raymond Dart Papers, University of Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  69. The Taungs skull. (1925, 7 February). The Star. In Raymond Dart Papers, University of Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  70. Theunissen, L. T. (1988). Eugène Dubois and the ape-man from Java: The history of the first ‘missing link’ and its discoverer. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  71. Tobias, P. V. (2006). The discovery of the Taung skull of Australopithecus africanus and the neglected role of Professor RB Young. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 61(2), 131–138.Google Scholar
  72. Vetter, J. (2008). Cowboys, scientists, and fossils: The field site and local collaboration in the American West. Isis, 99(2), 273–303.Google Scholar
  73. Vetter, J. (2016). Field life: Science in the American West during the railroad era. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  74. Woodward, A. S. (1925). The fossil anthropoid ape from Taungs. Nature, 115, 235.Google Scholar
  75. Young, R. B. (1925). The calcareous tufa deposits of the Campbell Rand, from Boetsap to Taungs Native Reserve. South African Journal of Geology, 28, 55–67.Google Scholar
  76. Zuckerman, S. (1928). Age-changes in the chimpanzee, with special reference to growth of brain, eruption of teeth, and estimation of age; with a note on the Taungs ape. Journal of Zoology, 98(1), 1–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations