Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Wilhelm His and mechanistic approaches to development at the time of Entwicklungsmechanik

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the end of the nineteenth century, approaches from experimental physiology made inroads into embryological research. A new generation of embryologists felt urged to study the mechanisms of organ formation. This new program, most prominently defended by Wilhelm Roux (1850–1924), was called Entwicklungsmechanik. Named variously as “causal embryology”, “physiological embryology” or “developmental mechanics”, it catalyzed the movement of embryology from a descriptive science to one exploring causal mechanisms. This article examines the specific scientific and epistemological meaning of the mechanistic approaches of embryological development by focusing on Wilhelm His’ (1831–1904) histogenetic work. Roux was neither the first, nor the only one to argue for an experimental exploration of causes in embryology. At the time of Roux, physiological explanations of the genesis of the anatomical forms were developing in parallel, not only in German-speaking countries, but in France, Switzerland and English-speaking countries as well. The experimental approach and the cellular descriptions of embryogenesis were already omni-present when Roux proposed his Entwicklungsmechanik. However, these approaches remained disjointed. It appears that it was Wilhelm His who first succeeded in combining the question of the causal factors determining epigenesis, which was closely connected with experimentation on, and cellular descriptions of, development, in a coherent and concrete synthesis, making him one of the true initiators of the developmental mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balfour, F. M. (1880–1881). A treatrise on comparative embryology. London: Macmillan.

  • Barbara, J.-G. (2010). La naissance du neurone. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billings, S. M. (1971). Concepts of nerve fibers development, 1839–1930. Journal of the History of Biology, 4(2), 275–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenbach, J. F. (1792). An assay on generation. London: Cadell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenbach, J. F. (1817). The institutions of physiology. London: Bensley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenbach, J. F., & Born, C. F. (1789). Zwei Abhandlungen über die Nutritionskraft welche von der Kayserlichen Academie der Wissenschaften in St. Petersburg den Preis gethheilt erhalten haben. Nebst einer fernern Erlaüterung eben derselben Materie von C.F. Wolff. St. Petersburg: Kayserlichen Academie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, C. (1762). Considérations sur les corps organisés, 1985. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabry, L. (1887). Contribution à l’embryologie normale et tératologique des ascidies simples. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, F. B. (1991). The rise of classical descriptive embryology. In S. F. Gilbert (Ed.), A conceptual history of modern embryology (pp. 1–29). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, F. B. (2007). Living with the biogenetic law: A reappraisal. In M. D. Laublchler & J. Maienschein (Eds.), From embryology to evo-devo. A history of developmental evolution (pp. 37–81). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohnheim, J. (1867). Über die Endigungen der sensiblen Nerven in der Hornhaut. Virchows Archiv, 38, 343–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, W. (1977). Biology in the nineteenth century. Problems of form, function and transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beer, G. R. (1947). The differenciation of neural crest cells into visceral cartilages and odontoblasts in Amblystoma, and a re-examination of the germ-layer theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 134(876), 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detlefsen, K. (2006). Explanation and demonstration in the Haller-Wolff debate. In J. E. H. Smith (Ed.), The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy (pp. 235–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmore, C. (Ed.). (1991). A history or regeneration research. Milestones in the evolution of a science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driesch, H. (1896). Die taktische Reizbarkeit der Mesenchymzellen von Echinus microtuberculatus. Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen, 3, 362–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driesch, H. (1908). The science and philosophy of the organism. London: Adam and Charles Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dröscher, A. (2002). Edmund B. Wilson’s, “the cell” and cell theory between 1896 and 1925. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 24(3/4), 357–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dröscher, A. (2014). Images of cell trees, cell lines, and cell fates: The legacy of Ernst Haeckel and August Weismann in stem cell research. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 36(2), 157–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, J.-C. (2007). Prekantian revival of epigenesis : Caspar Friedrich Wolff’s De formatione intestinorum (1768–1769). In P. Huneman (Ed.), Understanding purpose. Kant and the philosophy of biology. Rochester,NY: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, J. C., & Schmitt, S. (Eds.). (2004). Du feuillet au gène. Une histoire de l’embryologie moderne (fin XVIIIe–XXe siècle). Paris: Editions Rue d’Ulm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J.-L. (1972). Le concept expérimental dans l’œuvre tératologique d’Etienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences, 25(4), 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J.-L. (1991). Laurent Chabry and the beginnings of experimental embryology in France. In S. F. Gilbert (Ed.), A conceptual history of modern embryology (pp. 31–42). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J.-L. (1994). Leben und Verk von Camille Dareste (1822–1899), Schöpfer der experimentellen Teratologie. Halle: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoffroy Saint Hilaire, I. (1832–1837). Histoire générale et particulière de anomalies de l’organisation chez l’homme et les animaux, ou Traité de tératologie. Paris: Baillières.

  • Gilbert, S. F. (Ed.). (1991). A conceptual history of modern embryology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. F. (2006). Developmental biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer, J. (2007). Tracking organic processes: Representations and research styles in classical embryology and genetics. In M. D. Laublchler & J. Maienschein (Eds.), From embryology to evo-devo. A history of developmental evolution (pp. 375–433). Cambridge,MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E. (1866). Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Berlin: G. Reimer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E. (1875). Ziele und Wege der heutigen Entwicklungsgeschichte. Jena: Von Hermann Dufft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. K. (1992). Evolutionary developmental biology. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. K. (2008). The neural crest and neural crest cells: Discovery and significance for theories of embryonic organization. Journal of Biosciences, 33(5), 781–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. G. (1907). Observations on the living developing nerve fiber. Anatomical Record, 1(1), 116–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. G. (1914). The reaction of embryonic cells to solid structure. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 17(4), 521–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. G. (1924). Neuroblast versus sheath cell in the development of peripheral nerves. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 37(1), 123–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, C. (1894). Ueber die Bedeutung der Reizphysiologie für die kausale Auffassung von Vorgängen in die thierische Ontogenese. Biologisches Centralblatt, 14, 657–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • His, W. (1856). Beiträge zur normalen und pathologischen Histologie der Kornea. Basel: Schweighauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • His, W. (1868). Untersuchungen über die erste Anlage des Wirbelthierleibes: Die erste Entwicklung des Hühnchens im Ei. Leipzig: Vogel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • His, W. (1870). Beschreibung eines Mikrotoms. Archiv für mikroskopische Anatomie, 6, 229–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • His, W. (1874). Unsere Körperform und das physiologische Problem ihrer Entstehung. Briefe an einen befreundeten Naturforscher. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • His, W. (1880–1885). Anatomie menschlicher Embryonen. Leipzig: Vogel.

  • His, W. (1887a). Zur Geschichte des menschlichen Rückenmarkes und der Nervenwurzeln. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physischen Classe der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 13, 477–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • His, W. (1887b). Die Entwicklung der ersten Nervenbahnen beim menschlichen Embryo. Übersichtliche Darstellung. Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie Anatomische Abtheilung, 92, 368–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • His, W. (1889a). Über die Entwicklung des Riechlappens und des Riechganglions und über diejenige des verlängerten Markes. Verhandlungen der Anatomischen Gesellschaft, 3, 63–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • His, W. (1889b). Die Neuroblasten und deren Entstehung im embryonalen Marke. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physischen Classe der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 15, 311–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • His, W. (1889c). Die Formentwickelung des menschlichen Vorderhirns vom Ende des ersten bis zum Beginn des dritten Monats. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physischen Classe der Königlich Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 15, 673–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • His, W. (1895). Die anatomische Nomenklatur. Nomina anatomica. Leipzig: Veit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N. (1999). “Giving body” to embryos: Modeling, mechanism, and the microtome in late nineteenth-century anatomy. Isis, 90(3), 462–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N. (2000). Producing development: The anatomy of human embryo and the norms of Wilhelm His. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 74(1), 29–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N. (2015). Haeckel’s embryos. Image, evolution and fraud. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horder, T. J., & Weindling, P. J. (1985). Spemann and the organiser. In T. J. Horder, J. A. Witkowski, & C. C. Wylie (Eds.), A history of embryology (pp. 183–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horder, T. J., Witkowski, J. A., & Wylie, C. C. (Eds.). (1985). A history of embryology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M. (1991). Developmental neurobiology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, R., & Friebova, Z. (1966). Inflence of mitotic activity on neurulation movements. Nature, 209(5025), 822–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, E. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft. Berlin und Libau: Lagarde und Friedrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keibel, F., & Mail, F. P. (1910–1912). Manual of human embryology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

  • Kölliker, R. A. (1852). Handbuch der Gewebelehre des Menschen. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovalevsky, A. O. (1866). Entwickelungsgeschichte des einfachen Ascidien. Mémoires de l’Académie impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg, 10(15), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler, M. D., & Maienschein, J. (Eds.). (2007). From embryology to evo-devo. A history of developmental evolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, T. (1982). The strategy of life. Teleology and mechanics in nineteenth century german biology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, E. D., & Stapf, C. (2001). Unraveling the neuron jungle: The 1879–1886 publications by Wilhelm His on the embryological development of the human brain. Archives of Neurology, 58(11), 1932–1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, J. (2016). Normal development and experimental embryology: Edmund Beecher Wilson and Amphioxus. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 57(June), 44–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCord, K. (2013). Germ layers. Embryo Project Encyclopedia (2013-09 17).

  • Maienschein, J. (1985). Preformation or new formation—or neither or both? In T. J. Horder, J. A. Witkowski, & C. C. Wylie (Eds.), A history of embryology (pp. 73–108). Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein, J. (1991). The origins of Entwicklungsmechanik. In S. F. Gilbert (Ed.), A conceptual history of modern embryology (pp. 43–61). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein, J. (2014). Embryons under the microscope. The diverging meanings of life. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G. H. (1856). Lehrbuch der physiologischen Anatomie des Menschen. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mocek, R. (1998). Die werdende Form. Eine Geschichte der Kausalen Morphologie. Marburg an der Lahn: Basilisken-Presse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. H. (1897). The development of the frog’s egg. An introduction to experimental embryology. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, F. (1864). Für Darwin. Leipzig: Von Wilhelm Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, F., & O’Rahilly, R. (1986). Wilhelm His und 100 Jahre Embryologie des Menschen. Acta Anatomica, 125(2), 73–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhart, L. K. (1995). Biology takes form. Animal morphology and the German universities, 1800–1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, J. M. (1966). Ross Harrison’s contributions to experimental embryology. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 40(6), 525–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pander, H. C. (1817). Beiträge zur Entwickelungsgeschichte des Hühnchens im Eye. Wûrzburg: H.L. Brönner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J. B. (1893). Ectodermic origin of the cartilages of the head. Anatomischer Anzeiger, 8, 506–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purves, D., & Lichtman, J. W. (1985). Principles of neural development. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramón y Cajal, S. (1909–1911). Histologie du système nerveux de l’Homme et des Vertébrés. Paris: Maloine.

  • Rathke, M. H. (1829). Untersuchung über die Bildung und Entwickelung des FluBkrebses. Leipzig: Leopold Voss.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Remak, R. (1855). Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung der Wirberthiere. Berlin: Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. J. (2008). The tragic sense of life: Ernst Haeckel and the struggle of evolutionary thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (1986). Embryology and classical zoology in Great Britain. In T. J. Horder, J. A. Witkovski, & C. C. Wylie (Eds.), A history of embryology. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, S. A. (1981). Matter, life and generation. Eighteenth-century embryology and the Haller-Wolff debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux, W. (1878). Über die Verzweigungen der Blutgefässe des Menschen : Eine Morphologische Studie. Jenaische Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft, 12, 205–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux, W. (1881). Der Kampf der Theile im Organismus. Ein Beitrag zur vervollständigung der mechanischen Zweckmässigkeitlehre. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roux, W. (1885). Beiträge zur Entwickelungsmechanik des Embryo. I. Zur Orientierung über einige Probleme der embryonalen Entwicklung. Zeitschrift für Biologie, 21, 411–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux, W. (1888). Beiträge zur Entwickelungsmechanik des Embryo. 5. Über die künstliche Hervorbringung halber Embryonen durch Zerstörung einer der beiden ersten Furchungskugeln, sowie über sowie über die Nachentwickelung (Postgeneration) der fehlenden Körperhälfte. Virchows Archiv, 114, 113–153, 246–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, K. (Ed.). (1997). Landmarks in developmental biology. 1883–1924. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleiden, M. J. (1838). Beiträge zur Phytogenesis. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und Wissenschaftliche Medicin, 5, 137–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwann, T. (1839). Mikroskopische Untersuchungen über die Uebereinstimmung in der Struktur und dem Wachsthum der Thiere und Pflanzen. Berlin: Sander.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skedros, J. G., & Brand, R. A. (2011). Georg Hermann von Meyer (1815–1892). Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 469(11), 3072–3076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. E. H. (Ed.). (2006). The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Baer, K. E. (1828–1837). Ueber Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere: Beobachtung und Reflexion. Königsberg: Bornträger.

  • Weismann, A. (1892). Das Keimplasma: Eine Theorie der Vererbung. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellmann, J. (2010). Die Form des Werdens: Eine Kulturgeschichte der Embryologie, 1760–1830. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, C. O. (1878). The embryology of Clepsine. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 18(11), 215–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, C. O. (1887). A contribution to the history of the germ-layers in Clepsine. Journal of Morphology, 1(1), 105–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. (1889). The embryology of the earthworm. Journal of Morphology, 3(3), 387–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. (1892). The cell-lineage of Nereis. A contribution to the cytogeny of the annelid body. Journal of Morphology, 6(3), 361–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. B. (1894). The mosaic theory of development. In C. O. Whitman (Ed.), Biological lectures delivered at the Marine Biological Laboratory at Woods Hole (pp. 1–14). Boston: Ginn and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkowski, J. A. (1985). Ross Harrison and the experimental analysis of nerve growth: The origins of tissue culture. In T. J. Horder, J. A. Witkowski, & C. C. Wylie (Eds.), A history of embryology (pp. 149–177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, C. F. (1759). Theoria generationis (fac-similé: Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1966). Halle: Hendel.

  • Wolff, C. F. (1768–1769). De formatione intestinorum praecipue, tum et de amnio spurio, aliisque partibus embryonis gallinacei, nondum visis. Novi Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 12, 13, 403–507, 478–530.

  • Wolff, C. F. (1789). Von der eigenthümlichen und wesentlichen Kraft der vegetabilischen, sowohl als auch der animalischen Substanz. St. Petersburg: Kayserliche Academie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Claude Dupont.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dupont, JC. Wilhelm His and mechanistic approaches to development at the time of Entwicklungsmechanik . HPLS 39, 21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-017-0148-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-017-0148-z

Keywords

Navigation