Evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) is a rapidly growing discipline whose ambition is to address questions that are of relevance to both evolutionary biology and developmental biology. This field has been increasingly progressing as a new and independent comparative science. However, we argue that evo-devo’s comparative approach is challenged by several metaphysical, methodological and socio-disciplinary issues related to the foundation of heuristic functions of model organisms and the possible criteria to be adopted for their selection. In addition, new tools have to be developed to deal with newly chosen model organisms. Therefore, we present a modelling framework suitable to integrate data on individual variation into evo-devo studies on new model organisms and thus to compensate for current idealization practices deliberately suppressing variation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
On the history of Waddington’s visual metaphor of the epigenetic landscape and especially its wide-spread use as a modelling tool in contemporary cell differentiation and stem cell biology, see Baedke (2013).
Amundson, R. (2005). The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Andersen, E. C., Gerke, J. P., Shapiro, J. A., Crissman, J. R., Ghosh, R., Bloom, J. S., et al. (2012). Chromosome-scale selective sweeps shape Caenorhabditis elegans genomic diversity. Nature Genetics, 44, 285–290.
Ankeny, R. A. (2001). Model organisms as models: Understanding the ‘lingua franca’ of the human genome project. Philosophy of Science, 68, S251–S261.
Baedke, J. (2013). The epigenetic landscape in the course of time: Conrad Hal Waddington’s methodological impact on the life sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 756–773.
Bai, M., Beutel, R. G., Song, K. Q., Liu, W. G., Malqin, H., Li, S., et al. (2012). Evolutionary patterns of hind wing morphology in dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). Arthropod Structure and Development, 41, 505–513.
Bai, M., McCullough, E., Song, K. Q., Liu, W. G., & Yang, X. K. (2011). Evolutionary constraints in hind wing shape in Chinese dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). PLoS One, 6, e21600. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021600.
Baum, D. A., Smith, S. D., & Donovan, S. S. S. (2005). The tree-thinking challenge. Science, 310, 979–980.
Bolker, J. A. (1995). Model systems in developmental biology. BioEssays, 17, 451–455.
Braendle, C., Caillaud, M. C., & Stern, D. L. (2005a). Genetic mapping of aphicarus: a sex-linked locus controlling a wing polymorphism in the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum). Heredity, 94, 435–442.
Braendle, C., Friebe, I., Caillaud, M. C., & Stern, D. L. (2005b). Genetic variation for an aphid polyphenism is genetically linked to a naturally occurring wing polymorphism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 657–664.
Brakefield, P. M., & Frankino, W. A. (2007). Polyphenisms in Lepidoptera: Multidisciplinary approaches to studies of evolution. In D. W. Whitman & T. N. Ananthakrishnan (Eds.), Phenotypic plasticity in insects. Mechanisms and consequences (pp. 121–151). Plymouth: Science Publishers.
Brisson, J. (2010). Aphid wing dimorphism: Linking environmental and genetic control of trait variation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 365, 605–616.
Casane, D., & Laurenti, P. (2013). Why coelacanths are not ‘living fossils’. A review of molecular and morphological data. BioEssays, 35, 332–338.
Chang, H. H., Hemberg, M., Barahona, M., Ingber, D. E., & Huang, S. (2008). Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells. Nature, 453, 544–547.
Cheverud, J. M. (2001). The genetic architecture of pleiotropic relations and differential epistasis. In G. P. Wagner (Ed.), The character concept in evolutionary biology (pp. 411–433). San Diego: Academic Press.
Collins, F., & Galas, D. (1993). A new five-year plan for the U.S. human genome project. Science, 262, 43–46.
Collins, F. S., Patrinos, A., Jordan, E., Chakravarti, A., Gesteland, R., & Walters, L. (1998). New goals for the U.S. human genome project: 1998–2003. Science, 282, 682–689.
Crisp, M. D., & Cook, L. G. (2005). Do early branching lineages signify ancestral traits? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 122–128.
de Beer, G. (1930). Embryology and evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
de Beer, G. (1958). Embryos and ancestors. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
de Chadarevian, S. (1998). Of worms and programs: Caenorhabditis elegans and the study of development. Studies in History and Philosophy of the Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 29, 81–105.
de Vries, H. (1904). Species and varieties: Their origin by mutation. Chicago: Open Court.
Frankino, W. A., & Raff, R. A. (2004). Evolutionary importance and pattern of phenotypic plasticity. In T. J. DeWitt & S. M. Scheiner (Eds.), Phenotypic plasticity: Functional and conceptual approaches (pp. 64–81). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fusco, G., & Minelli, A. (2000). Measuring morphological complexity of segmented animals: Centipedes as model systems. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 13, 38–46.
Fusco, G., & Minelli, A. (2010). Phenotypic plasticity in development and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 365, 547–556.
Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology, 23, 536–544.
Ghiselin, M. T. (1997). Metaphysics and the origin of species. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Gilbert, S. F., & Epel, D. (2009). Ecological developmental biology: Integrating epigenetics, medicine, and evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Hall, B. K. (2012). Evolutionary developmental biology (Evo-Devo): Past, present, and future. Evolution Education and Outreach, 5, 184–193.
Hansen, T. F. (2003). Is modularity necessary for evolvability? Remarks on the relationship between pleiotropy and evolvability. BioSystems, 69, 83–94.
Harris K.D.M., Bartlett N.J., Lloyd V.K., (2012). Daphnia as an emerging epigenetic model organism. Genetics Research International, 8, doi:10.1155/2012/147892.
Hendrikse, J. L., Parsons, T. E., & Hallgrímsson, B. (2007). Evolvability as the proper focus of evolutionary developmental biology. Evolution & Development, 9, 393–401.
Hodgkin, J. (1998). Seven types of pleiotropy. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 42, 501–505.
Huang, S. (2009a). Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: More than just noise. Development, 136, 3853–3862. doi:10.1242/dev.035139.
Huang, S. (2009b). Reprogramming cell fates: Reconciling rarity with robustness. BioEssays, 31, 546–560.
Huang, S. (2011). The molecular and mathematical basis of Waddington’s epigenetic landscape: A framework for post-darwinian biology? BioEssays, 34, 149–157.
Hull, D. L. (1976). Are species really individuals? Systematic Zoology, 25, 174–191.
Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution: The modern synthesis. London: Allen & Unwin.
Janzen, F. J., & Phillips, P. C. (2006). Exploring the evolution of environmental sex determination, especially in reptiles. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19, 1775–1784.
Jenner, R. A. (2006). Unburdening evo-devo: Ancestral attractions, model organisms, and basal baloney. Development Genes and Evolution, 216, 385–394.
Kaern, M., Elston, T. C., Blake, W. J., & Collins, J. J. (2005). Stochasticity in gene expression: From theories to phenotypes. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 451–464.
Krell, F. T., & Cranston, P. S. (2004). Which side of the tree is more basal. Systematic Entomology, 29, 279–281.
Laforsch, C., & Tollrian, R. (2004). Inducible defenses in multipredator environments: Cyclomorphosis in Daphnia cucullata. Ecology, 85, 2302–2311.
Lamarck, J.-B. (1809). Philosophie zoologique. Paris: Dentu.
Laubichler, M. D., & Rheinberger, H.-J. (2004). Alfred Kühn (1885–1968) and developmental evolution. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 302B, 103–110.
Lloyd V. K., Brisson J. A., Fitzpatrick K. A., McEachern L. A., Verhulst E. C. (2012). The epigenetics of emerging and nonmodel organisms. Genetics Research International, 2, doi:10.1155/2012/491204.
Love, A. (2010). Idealization in evolutionary developmental investigation: A tension between phenotypic plasticity and normal stages. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 679–690.
McGhee, G. R. (1999). Theoretical morphology: The concept and its applications. New York: Columbia University Press.
McGhee, G. R. (2007). The geometry of evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mezey, J. G., Cheverud, J. M., & Wagner, G. P. (2000). Is the genotype-phenotype map modular? A statistical approach using mouse quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 156, 305–311.
Minelli, A. (2003). The development of animal form: Ontogeny, morphology, and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Minelli, A. (2009). Forms of becoming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Minelli, A. (2010). Evolutionary developmental biology does not offer a significant challenge to the neo-darwinian paradigm. In F. J. Ayala & R. Arp (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology (pp. 213–226). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Miura, T. (2005). Developmental regulation of caste-specific characters in social-insect polyphenism. Evolution & Development, 7, 122–129.
Moczek, A. P. (2007). Developmental capacitance, genetic accommodation, and adaptive evolution. Evolution & Development, 9, 299–305.
Müller, G. B. (2007a). Evo-devo: Extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 943–949.
Müller, G. B. (2007b). Six memos for EvoDevo. In M. D. Laubichler & J. Maienschein (Eds.), From embryology to EvoDevo: A history of developmental evolution (pp. 499–524). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Müller, G. B. (2008). EvoDevo as a discipline. In A. Minelli & G. Fusco (Eds.), Evolving pathways: Key themes in evolutionary developmental biology (pp. 3–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Müller-Wille, S., & Rheinberger, H.-J. (2009). Das Gen im Zeitalter der Postgenomik: Eine wissenschaftshistorische Bestandsaufnahme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Nijhout, H. F. (2007). Complex traits: Genetic, development, and evolution. In R. Sansom & R. N. Brandon (Eds.), Integrating evolution and development (pp. 93–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pagel, M., Venditti, C., & Meade, A. (2006). Large punctuational contribution of speciation to evolutionary divergence at the molecular level. Science, 314, 119–121.
Pigliucci, M. (2010). Genotype → phenotype mapping and the end of the ‘genes as blueprint’ metaphor. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 557–566.
Pigliucci, M., & Müller, G. (Eds.). (2010). Evolution: The extended synthesis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Pigliucci, M., Murren, C. J., & Schlichting, C. D. (2006). Phenotypic plasticity and evolution by genetic assimilation. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 2362–2367.
Pujadas, E., & Feinberg, A. P. (2012). Regulated noise in the epigenetic landscape of development and disease. Cell, 148, 1123–1131.
Raj, A., & van Oudenaarden, A. (2008). Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell, 135, 216–226.
Saunders, P. T., & Ho, M. V. (1984). The complexity of organisms. In J. W. Pollard (Ed.), Evolutionary theory: Paths into the future (pp. 121–139). Chichester: Wiley.
Schlichting, C. D., & Pigliucci, M. (1998). Phenotypic evolution: A reaction norm perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Schnabel, R., Hutter, H., Moerman, D., & Schnabel, H. (1997). Assessing normal embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans using a 4D microscope: Variability of development and regional specification. Developmental Biology, 184, 234–265.
Schulze, J., & Schierenberg, E. (2011). Evolution of embryonic development in nematodes. EvoDevo, 2, 18. doi:10.1186/2041-9139-2-18.
Srinivasan, D. A., & Brisson J. A. (2012). Aphids: A model for polyphenism and epigenetics. Genetics Research International, 12, doi:10.1155/2012/431531.
Stearns, F. W. (2010). One hundred years of pleiotropy: A retrospective. Genetics, 186, 767–773.
Sulston, J. E., Schierenberg, E., White, J. G., & Thomson, J. N. (1983). The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental Biology, 100, 64–119.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Public Health Service—National Institutes of Health), U.S. Department of Energy (Office of Energy Research—Office of Health and Environmental Research) (1990), Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance. The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years FY 1991–1995. National Institutes of Health Publication No. 90–1590.
Valena S., & Moczek A. P. (2012). Epigenetic mechanisms underlying developmental plasticity in horned beetles. Genetics Research International, 14, doi:10.1155/2012/576303.
Vorob’eva, E. I. (2010). Modern evolutionary developmental biology: Mechanical and molecular genetic or phylogenetic approaches? Russian Journal of Developmental Biology, 41, 283–290.
Waddington, C. H. (1939). An introduction to modern genetics. New York: Macmillan.
Waddington, C. H. (1957). The strategy of the genes: A discussion of some aspects of theoretical biology. London: Allen & Unwin.
Wagner, G. P., & Zhang, J. (2011). The pleiotropic structure of the genotype-phenotype map: The evolvability of complex organisms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12, 204–213.
Wilkins, A. S. (2002). The evolution of developmental systems. Sunderland: Sinauer.
Wolpert, L., & Tickle, C. (2011). Principles of development (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
We thank Staffan Müller-Wille, Philippe Huneman, and an anonymous referee for constructive comments on earlier versions of this paper. The material of this paper was presented at the ‘Second European Advanced Seminar in the Philosophy of the Life Sciences: in vivo, ex vivo, in vitro, in silico – Models in the Life Sciences’ (2012) hosted by the Brocher Foundation, Geneva. JB: Financial support from the Ruhr University Research School (RURS) is gratefully acknowledged.
About this article
Cite this article
Minelli, A., Baedke, J. Model organisms in evo-devo: promises and pitfalls of the comparative approach. HPLS 36, 42–59 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-014-0004-3
- Model organisms
- Epigenetic landscape
- Individual variation
- Genotype-phenotype mapping
- Developmental plasticity