Advertisement

Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 49–59 | Cite as

Longitudinal Relations among Cyber, Physical, and Relational Bullying and Victimization: Comparing Majority and Minority Ethnic Youth

  • Christopher P. Barlett
  • Michelle F. Wright
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Findings from myriad studies have shown that cyberbullying perpetration is significantly positively correlated with relational and physical bullying perpetration in youth. Furthermore, similar trends have been found for victimization type. Despite the wealth of research testing the predictors of both cyberbullying perpetration and victimization, few studies have tested whether belonging to an ethnic minority moderates these effects. The current study sampled 828 youth in the United States. All participants completed measures of cyber, relational, and physical bullying perpetration and victimization two times during the school year. We classified youth into majority (Caucasian) and minority (non-Caucasian) groups based on the ethnicity makeup of the sample. Results showed that majority participants reported less physical bullying, more physical victimization at Time 1, more cyberbullying perpetration at Time 1, more frequency cyberbullying victimization at both data collection times, and higher relational victimization at Time 1. Subsequent longitudinal grouped path model results showed that participant group status (majority vs. minority ethnicity) moderated the relation between Time 1 physical bullying and Time 2 cyberbullying perpetration, the relationship between Time 1 cybervictimization and Time 2 cyberbullying, and the relationship between Time 1 relational victimization and cyber victimization We believe these results highlight the importance of testing ethnicity as a potential moderator in the literature examining predictors of both cyber bullying perpetration and victimization.

Keywords

Cyberbullying Bullying Longitudinal Ethnicity 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arie, Y., & Mesch, G. S. (2016). The spatial and social network dimensions of mobile communication: a test of the Social Stratification and Social Diversification Hypotheses. Communication Research, 43, 713–734. doi: 10.1177/0093650215573961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlett, C. P. (2016). Past, present, and future theoretical developments in predicting cyberbullying behavior. In M. Wright (Ed.), A Socio-Ecological Approach to Cyberbullying (pp. 13–28). Nova Science Publishers: New York.Google Scholar
  3. Barlett, C. P., & Gentile, D. A. (2012). Attacking others online: the formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 123–135. doi: 10.1037/a0028113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlett, C. P., Gentile, D. A., Anderson, C. A., Suzuki, K., Sakamoto, A., Yamaoka, A., & Katsura, R. (2014). Cross-cultural differences in cyberbullying behavior: a short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45, 300–313. doi: 10.1177/0022022113504622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 341–350. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonanno, R. A., & Hymel, S. (2013). Cyber bullying and internalizing difficulties: above and beyond the impact of traditional forms of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 685–679. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9937-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Doane, A. N., Pearson, M. R., & Kelley, M. L. (2014). Predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among college students: an application of the Theory of Reasoned Action. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 154–162. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goebert, D., Else, I., Matsu, C., Chung-Do, J., & Chang, J. Y. (2011). The impact of cyberbullying on substance use and mental health in a multiethnic sample. Maternity and Child Health Journal, 15, 1282–1286. doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0672-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzalez, A. L. (2017). Disadvantaged minorities’ use of the Internet to expand their social networks. Communication Research, 44, 467–486. doi: 10.1177/0093650214565925.
  10. Harris, K. M., & Aboujaoude, E. (2016). Online friendship, romance, and sex: properties and associations of the Online Relationship Initiation Scale. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 19, 487–493. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Heirman, W., & Walrave, M. (2012). Predicting adolescent perpetration in cyberbullying: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Psicothema, 24, 614–620.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: an ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 311–322. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jung, Y., Qui, J. L., & Kim, Y. (2001). Internet connectedness and inequality: beyond the “divide”. Communication Research, 28, 507–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, Y., Jung, J., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2007). Ethnicity, place, and communication technology: effects of ethnicity on multi-dimensional internet connectedness. Information Technology and People, 20, 282–303. doi: 10.1108/09593840710822877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073–1137. doi: 10.1037/a0035618.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kupczynski, L., Mundy, M., & Green, M. E. (2013). The prevalence of cyberbullying among ethnic groups of high school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 1, 48–53.Google Scholar
  17. Lenhart, A. (2015). Mobile access shifts social media use to other online activities. Retrieved on 11/8/2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/mobile-access-shifts-social-media-use-and-other-online-activities/.
  18. Lin, C. A., Atkin, D. J., Cappotto, C., Davis, C., Dean, J., Eisenbaum, J., House, K., Lange, R., Merceron, A., Metzger, J., Mitchum, A., Nicholls, H., & Vidican, S. (2015). Ethnicity, digital divides and uses of the internet for health information. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 216–223. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lowry, P. B., Zhang, J., Wang, C., & Siponen, M. (2017). Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media?: An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning (SSSL) model. Information Systems Research, (in press).Google Scholar
  20. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mazur, E., & Richards, L. (2011). Adulescents’ and emerging adults’ social networking online: Homophily or diversity? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2011.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mesch, G. S. (2012). Minority status and the use of computer-mediated communication: a test of the Social Diversification Hypothesis. Communication Research, 39, 317–337. doi: 10.1177/0093650211398865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ortega-Ruiz, R., Del Rey, R., & Casas, J. A. (2012). Knowing, building and living together on internet and social networks: the ConRed cyberbullying prevention program. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6, 303–313.Google Scholar
  24. Perrin, A. (2015). One-fifth of Americans report going online ‘almost constantly’. Retrieved on 11/8/2016 from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/12/08/one-fifth-of-americans-report-going-online-almost-constantly/.
  25. Putallaz, M., Grimes, C. L., Foster, K. J., Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D., & Dearing, K. (2007). Overt and relational aggression and victimization: multiple perspectives within the school setting. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 523–547.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Schneider, S. K., O’Donnell, L., & Smith, E. (2015). Trends in cyberbullying and school bullying victimization in a regional census of high school students, 2006-2012. Journal of School Health, 85, 611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scultze-Krumbholz, A., Schultze, M., Zagorscak, P., Wolfer, R., & Scheithauer, H. (2016). Feeling cybervictims’ pain – The effect of empathy training on cyberbullying. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 147–156. doi: 10.1002/ab.21613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith, P. K., Thompson, F., & Bhatti, S. (2012). Ethnicity, gender, bullying and cyberbullying in English secondary school pupils. Studia Edukacyjne, 23, 7–18.Google Scholar
  29. Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Topcu, C., Erdur-Baker, O., & Capa-Aydin, Y. (2008). Examination of cyberbullying experiences among Turkish students from different school types. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11, 643–648. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Twyman, K., Saylor, C., Taylor, L. A., & Comeaux, C. (2010). Comparing children and adolescents engaged in cyberbullying to matched peers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13, 195–199. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School bullying among US adolescents: physical, verbal, relational and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 368–375.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Wigderson, S., & Lynch, M. (2013). Cyber- and traditional peer victimization: unique relationships with adolescent well-being. Psychology of Violence, 3, 297–309. doi: 10.1037/a0033657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2013). The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: The moderating effect of peer rejection. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 662–674. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9903-3.
  35. Wright, M. F., Li, Y., & Shi, J. (2014). Chinese adolescents’ social status goals: Associations with behaviors and attributions for relational aggression. Youth and Society, 46, 566–588. doi: 10.1177/0044118X12448800.
  36. Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Del Rey, R. (2015). Scientific research on bullying and cyberbullying: Where have we been and where are we going. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 188–198. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gettysburg CollegeGettysburgUSA
  2. 2.Pennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations