Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 61–70 | Cite as

The Protective Role of Friends in the Link between Daily Cyber Victimization and Adjustment Problems among Predominately Latino Adolescents

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The current study examined whether friendship factors, including time spent with friends and perceived friendship quality, moderate daily associations between cyber victimization and adolescent adjustment (i.e., distress, anger, attendance problems, perceived school safety). The study focuses on the experiences of predominately Latino youth, as they remain an understudied group in cyber victimization research. Participants included 136 high school students (88% Latino) who completed daily checklists across five consecutive school days. Hierarchical linear modeling results revealed that time spent with friends moderated the associations between cyber victimization with distress, anger and attendance problems. For example, on days that adolescents did not spend time with their friends, there was a significant link between cyber victimization and feelings of anger. For adolescents who did spend time with their friends during the day, this association did not exist. Friendship quality only buffered the negative association between daily cyber victimization and feelings of distress.

Keywords

Cyber victimization Adolescence Protective Friendships Latino adolescents 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Funding

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 1F31HD070723-01A1

References

  1. Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 341–350. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boulton, M. J., Trueman, M., Chau, C., Whitehand, C., & Amatya, K. (1999). Concurrent and longitudinal links between friendship and peer victimization: Implications for befriending interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 461–466. doi: 10.1006/jado.1999.0240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, A., Lopez, G., & Lopez, M. H. (2016). Digital divide narrows for Latinos as more Spanish speakers and immigrants go online. Pew Research Center: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Buhrmester, D. (1996). Need fulfillment, interpersonal competence, and the developmental contexts of early adolescent friendship. In W. Bukowski, A. Newcomb, & W. Hartup (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 158–185). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bukowski, W. M., & Adams, R. (2005). Peer relationships and psychopathology: Markers, moderators, mediators, mechanisms, and meaning. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 3–10. doi: 10.1207/215374424jccp3401_1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cuadros, O., & Berger, C. (2016). The protective role of friendship quality on the wellbeing of adolescents victimized by peers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 1877–1888. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0504-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson, L. M., & Demaray, M. K. (2007). Social support as a moderator between victimization and internalizing-externalizing distress from bullying. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 383–405.Google Scholar
  8. Dolev-Cohen, M., & Barak, A. (2013). Adolescents’ use of instant messaging as a means of emotional relief. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Espinoza, G. (2015). Daily cybervictimization among Latino adolescents: Links with emotional, physical and school adjustment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 38, 39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2015.04.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Espinoza, G., & Juvonen, J. (2012). Methods used in cyberbullying research. In S. Bauman, D. Cross, & J. Walker (Eds.), Principles of cyberbullying research: Definitions, measures, and methodology (pp. 112–124). Routledge: New York, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Espinoza, G., Gonzales, N. A., & Fuligni, A. J. (2013). Daily school peer victimization experiences among Mexican-American adolescents: Associations with psychosocial, physical and school adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1775–1788. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9874-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitzpatrick, S., & Bussey, K. (2014). The role of perceived friendship self-efficacy as a protective factor against the negative effects of social victimization. Social Development, 23, 41–60. doi: 10.1111/sode.12032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gore, S., & Aseltine, R. H. (2003). Race and ethnic differences in depressed mood following the transition from high school. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 370–389. doi: 10.2307/1519785.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenberg, M. T., Siegel, J. M., & Leitch, C. J. (1983). The nature and importance of attachment relationships to parents and peers during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12(5), 373–386. doi: 10.1007/BF02088721.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gross, E. F. (2009). Logging on, bouncing back: An experimental investigation of online communication following social exclusion. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1787–1793. doi: 10.1037/a0016541.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Guan, S. A., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2009). Youth internet use: Risks and opportunities. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 351–356. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32832bd7e0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ham, M., & Larson, R. (1990). The cognitive moderation of daily stress in early adolescence. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(4), 567–585. doi: 10.1007/BF00938060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 711–722. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9902-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hodges, E. V. E., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94–101. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoggard, L. S., Byrd, C. M., & Sellers, R. M. (2015). The lagged effects of racial discrimination on depressive symptomology and interactions with racial identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 216–225. doi: 10.1037/cou0000069.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang, Y., & Chao, C. (2010). An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1581–1590. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.005.
  22. Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2012). Trends in youth internet victimization: Findings from three youth internet safety surveys 2000–2010. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(2), 179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.09.015.
  23. Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kendrick, K., Jutengren, G., & Stattin, H. (2012). The protective role of supportive friends against bullying perpetration and victimization. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1069–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kiang, L., Yip, T., Gonzales-Becken, M., Witkow, M., & Fuligni, A. J. (2006). Ethnic identity and the daily psychological well-being of adolescents from Mexican and Chinese backgrounds. Child Development, 77(5), 1338–1350. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00938.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kohler, A., & Lazarin, M. (2007). Hispanic education in the United States. Washington DC: National Council of La Raza.Google Scholar
  27. Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kowalski, R. M., Giumett, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073–1137. doi: 10.1037/a0035618.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Larson, R., & Richards, M. H. (1991). Daily companionship in late childhood and early adolescence: Changing developmental contexts. Child Development, 62, 284–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01531.x.
  30. Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, social media and technology overview 2015. Pew Research Center: Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  31. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Pew Internet and American Life Project: Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  32. Lenhart, A., Smith, A., Anderson, M., Duggan, M., & Perrin, A. (2015). Teens, technology and friendships. Pew Research Center: Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  33. Lorr, M., & McNair, D. M. (1971). The profile of mood States manual. San Francisco: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
  34. Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Cortesi, S., & Gasser, U. (2013). Teens and Technology 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project.Google Scholar
  35. Malcolm, K. T., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Rex-Lear, M., & Waldrip, A. M. (2006). Divided we fall: Children’s friendships and peer victimization. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(5), 721–740. doi: 10.1177/0265407506068260.
  36. Masten, C. L., Telzer, E. H., Fuligni, A. J., Lieberman, M. D., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). Time spent with friends in adolescence relates to less neural sensitivity to later peer rejection. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(1), 106–114. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq098.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mesch, G. S. (2009). Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 12(4), 387–393. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2009.0068.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mishna, F., Khoury-Kassabri, M., Gadalla, T., & Daciuk, J. (2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully-victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nakamoto, J., & Schwartz, D. (2011). The association between peer victimization and functioning at school among urban Latino children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. doi: 10.3102/10769986031004437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raudenbusch, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. New York: Sage Publications Inc..Google Scholar
  42. Romero, A. J., Wiggs, C. B., Valencia, C., & Bauman, S. (2013). Latina teen suicide and bullying. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 35, 159–173. doi: 10.1177/0739986312474237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Bowker, J. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In M. H. Bornstein, T. Leventhal, & R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, Vol. 4: Ecological settings and processses (pp. 175–222). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  44. Sandler, I. N., Miller, P., Short, J., & Wolchik, S. A. (1989). Social support as a protective factor for children in stress. In D. Belle (Ed.), Children’s social networks and social supports (pp. 277–307). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  45. Schmidt, M. E., & Bagwell, C. L. (2007). The protective role of friendships in overtly and relationally victimized boys and girls. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53(3), 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Dodge, K. A., Petit, G. S., & Bates, J. E. (2008). Friendships with peers who are low or high in aggression as moderators of the link between peer victimization and declines in academic functioning. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 719–730. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9200-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Smokowski, P. R., Evans, C. B. R., & Cotter, K. L. (2014). The differential impacts of episodic, chronic and cumulative physical bullying and cyberbullying: The effects of victimization on the school experiences, social support and mental health of rural adolescents. Violence and Victims, 29, 1029–1046. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00076.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  49. Wright, M. F. (2016). Cybervictimization and substance use among adolescents: The moderation of perceived social support. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 16, 93–112. doi: 10.1080/1533256X.2016.1143371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang, C., & Brown, B. B. (2013). Motives for using Facebook, patterns of Facebook activities, and late adolescents’ social adjustment to college. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 13, 403–416. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9836-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Palmer, N. A., & Reisner, S. L. (2015). Online social support as a buffer against online and offline peer and sexual victimization among U.S. LGBT and non-LGBT youth. Child Abuse and Neglect, 39, 123–136. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.08.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Child and Adolescent StudiesCalifornia State University, FullertonFullertonUSA

Personalised recommendations