Abstract
This study critically examines the limitations of liberalism in effectively addressing the climate crisis, informed by Domenico Losurdo’s critique and the lens of posthumanism. It illuminates the core liberal focus on individual rights and autonomy, which stands in stark contrast with the collective, interconnected nature of global environmental challenges. Through a detailed engagement with Losurdo’s analytical framework and posthumanist philosophy, the paper argues for a fundamental shift within liberal thought. This involves the incorporation of a robust environmental ethic and a commitment to global justice to reconcile the intrinsic values of liberalism with the urgent demands of environmental sustainability and collective action. The proposed reconfigured liberal philosophy seeks to combine its traditional strengths with a renewed focus on collective well-being, offering a more comprehensive and effective strategy for confronting the existential threat of the climate crisis. This study argues that such a reimagined liberal approach not only enhances its relevance in the face of global environmental challenges but also serves as a viable pathway toward promoting a more just and sustainable future.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The author confrms that the data generated or analyzed during this study are available within this article.
Code availability
No code was utilized in this study.
References
Baldwin, G. 2023. Rawls and Animal Moral Personality. Animals 13 (7): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13071238.
Barry, J. 2007. The Environment and Social Theory. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946923.
Barry, J. 2012. The Politics of Actually Existing Unsustainability: Human Flourishing in a Climate-Changed, Carbon Constrained World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695393.001.0001.
Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv111jh6w.
Biermann, F. 2014. Earth System Governance: World Politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Boer, R.A. 2023. Truncated Marxism: On the Ideological Structure of Western Marxism. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 16: 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-023-00366-0.
Boylan, B.M., J. McBeath, and B. Wang. 2021. US–China Relations: Nationalism, the Trade War, and COVID-19. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 14: 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-020-00302-6.
Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. New York: Polity.
Brooks, T. 2013. Climate Change Justice. PS: Political Science and Politics 46: 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512001400.
Brooks, T. 2020. Climate Change Ethics for an Endangered World. London: Routledge.
Bullard, R.D. 2001. Environmental Justice in the 21st Century: Race Still Matters. Phylon 49 (3/4): 151–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3132626.
Cassegård, C., and H. Thörn. 2022. Towards a Critique of the Environmental Movement. In Post-apocalyptic Environmentalism, ed. C. Cassegård and H. Thörn, 113–132. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13203-2_5.
Clements, P. 2015. Rawlsian Ethics of Climate Change. Critical Criminology 23 (4): 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-015-9293-4.
Dobson, A. 2003. Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199258449.001.0001.
Donaldson, S., and W. Kymlicka. 2013. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eckersley, R. 2004. The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3364.001.0001.
Falk, R. 1995. On Humane Governance: Toward a New Global Politics. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.
Ferrando, F. 2019. Philosophical Posthumanism. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Gómez-Baggethun, E., and R. Muradian. 2015. In Markets We Trust? Setting the Boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in Ecosystem Services Governance. Ecological Economics 117: 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.016.
Haakonssen, K. 1981. The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628276.
Hansen, J. 2007. Scientific Reticence and Sea Level Rise. Environmental Research Letters 2 (2): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/2/2/024002.
Hansen, J. 2008. Tipping Point: Perspective of a Climatologist. In State of the Wild 2008–2009: A Global Portrait of Wildlife, Wildlands, and Oceans, ed. W. Woods, 6–15. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q.
He, Z., and Z. Chen. 2021. The Social Group Distinction of Nationalists and Globalists Amid COVID-19 Pandemic. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 14: 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-020-00310-6.
Hockmuth, K. 2022. The Developmental Sources of South Korean Neoliberalism. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 15: 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-021-00328-4.
Hung, A.T.W. 2022. Atomism, Communitarianism, and Confucian Familism. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 15: 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-021-00340-8.
Jing, Q. 2023. Hegel and China: Beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism. Chinese Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-023-00242-y.
Klein, N. 2014. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Latour, B. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. New York: Polity Press.
Leopold, A. 1989. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levine, A. 1974. Rawls’ Kantianism. Social Theory and Practice 3 (1): 47–63.
Losurdo, D. 2011. Liberalism: A Counter-History. London: Verso Books.
Makarychev, A., and T. Romashko. 2021. Precarious Sovereignty in a Post-liberal Europe: The Covid-19 Emergency in Estonia and Finland. Chinese Political Science Review 6 (1): 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00165-y.
Manale, P.A. 2023. Environmental Justice, Climate Change, and Agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 78 (2): 45A-49A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2023.0912A.
Moellendorf, D. 2015. Climate Change Justice. Philosophy Compass 10 (3): 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12201.
Narveson, J. 1995. The Case for Free Market Environmentalism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8: 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251877.
Nussbaum, M.C. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c7zftw.
O’Neill, J. 2006. Markets, Deliberation, and Environment. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203607169.
O’Neill, J. 1993. Ecology, Policy, and Politics. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203416570.
Phillips, D. 2015. Posthumanism, Environmental History, and Narratives of Collapse. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 22 (1): 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isv004.
Plumwood, V. 2001. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. London: Routledge.
Rand, T. 2020. The Case for Climate Capitalism: Economic Solutions for a Planet in Crisis. Toronto: ECW Press.
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Richards, K. 2007. The State and the Global Ecological Crisis. Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 182–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070466.
Sagoff, M. 2007. The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817472.
Schlosberg, D. 2004. Reconceiving Environmental Justice: Global Movements and Political Theories. Environmental Politics 13 (3): 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000229025.
Schlosberg, D. 2007. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.003.0001.
Schlosberg, D. 2013. Theorising Environmental Justice: The Expanding Sphere of a Discourse. Environmental Politics 22 (1): 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755387.
Schlosberg, D., and L.B. Collins. 2014. From Environmental to Climate Justice: Climate Change and the Discourse of Environmental Justice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 5 (3): 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.275.
Shue, H. 1999. Global Environment and International Inequality. International Affairs 75 (3): 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00092.
Spash, C.L. 2010. The Brave New World of Carbon Trading. New Political Economy 15 (2): 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460903556049.
Stiglitz, J.E. 2019. People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Vanderheiden, S. 2008. Atmospheric Justice: A Political Theory of Climate Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195334609.001.0001.
Waldron, J. 2002. God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke’s Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613920.
Walker, G. 2012. Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics. London: Routledge.
Wulansari, A.D. 2021. Indonesia’s Cheap Wages Regime: The Political Economy of Minimum Wages Policy Under Jokowi Presidency. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 14: 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-021-00324-8.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The author confrms sole responsibility for the study conception, analysis and interpretation of results, and manuscript preparation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Ethics approval
This paper does not include research involving human subjects.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, S. Librealism's Boundaries in Addressing the Climate Crisis: Insights from Domenico Losurdo and Posthumanism. Fudan J. Hum. Soc. Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-024-00407-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-024-00407-2