Too Much Information and the KWIC

  • Geoffrey RockwellEmail author
  • Stéfan Sinclair
Original Paper


This paper takes a media archaeology look at the development of the Keyword-in-Context (KWIC) display by Peter Luhn and how the KWIC helped automate ways of disseminating information about information. The paper takes the development of the KWIC as an example of the development of a knowledge technology that frames knowledge in a certain way. The KWIC and other information technologies transform knowledge into information that can be quantified and processed. Developments like the KWIC are the beginning of language engineering—a new way of conceiving of text as information to be manipulated. Finally, the paper proposes a way of reflecting on developments like the KWIC by replicating these early technologies. Replications can take the form of demonstration devices or knowledge things that expose the processes in our infrastructure.


KWIC Keyword-in-Context History of computing Digital humanities Peter luhn Knowledge society 


  1. Azuma, H. 2009. Otaku, Japan’s Database Animals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baird, D. 2004. Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blair, A.M. 2010a. Too Much To Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blair, A. 2010b. Information Overload, Then and Now. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Nov. 28, 2010. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
  5. Busa, R. 1980. The Annals of Humanities Computing: The Index Thomisticus. Computers and the Humanities 14(2): 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bush, V. 1945. As We May Think. The Atlantic Monthly. July 1945. 176. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
  7. Fischer, M. 1971. The KWIC Index Concept: A Retrospective View. In Key Papers in Information Science, ed. Arthur W. Elias, 121–134. Silver Spring: American Society for Information Science.Google Scholar
  8. Hacking, I. 2002. Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heidegger, M. 1966. Conversation on a Country Path About Thinking. In Discourse on Thinking, eds. J.M. Anderson and E.H. Freund, 58–90. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, S.E. 2016. Roberto Busa, S. J., and the Emergence of Humanities Computing: The Priest and the Punched Cards. Kindle Edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Knuth, D.E. 1984. Literate Programming. The Computer Journal 27(2): 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luhn, H.P. 1958. The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development 2(2): 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Luhn, H.P. 1966. Keyword-in-Context Index for Technical Literature (KWIC Index). In Readings in Automatic Language Processing, ed. D.G. Hays, 159–167. New York: American Elsevier Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Lyotard, J.-F. 1986. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (trans: Bennington, G. and Massumi, B.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  15. McCarty, W. 1993. Handmade, Computer-Assisted, and Electronic Concordances of Chaucer. CCH Working Papers 3: 49–65.Google Scholar
  16. Morozov, E. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  17. Parikka, J. 2012. What is Media Archaeology?. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  18. Rockwell, G. and S. Sinclair. 2016. Hermeneutica: Computer-Assisted Interpretation in the Humanities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rouse, M.A. and R.H. Rouse (eds.). 1991. The Development of Research Tools in the Thirteenth Century. In Authentic Witnesses: Approaches to Medieval Texts and Manuscripts. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ryle, G. 1945–46. Knowing How and Knowing That: The Presidential Address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shirky, Clay. 2008. It’s Not Information Overload. It’s Filter Failure. Web 2.0 Expo NY. Accessed 28 Jan 2018.
  22. Tasman, P. 1957. Literary Data Processing. IBM Journal of Research and Development 1(3): 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Fudan University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.McGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations