Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 357–369 | Cite as

Digital Humanities Within a Global Context: Creating Borderlands of Localized Expression

  • Amy E. EarhartEmail author
Original Paper


As scholars have begun the digitization of the world’s cultural materials, the understanding of what is to be digitized and how that digitization occurs remains narrowly imagined, with a distinct bias toward North American and European notions of culture, value and ownership. Humanists are well aware that cultural knowledge, aesthetic value and copyright/ownership are not monolithic, yet digital humanities work often expects the replication of narrow ideas of such. Drawing on the growing body of scholarship that situates the digital humanities in a broad global context, this paper points to areas of tension within the field and posits ways that digital humanities practitioners might resist such moves to homogenize the field. Working within the framework of border studies, the paper considers how working across national barriers might further digital humanities work. Finally, ideas of ownership and/or copyright are unique to country of origin and, as such, deserve careful attention. While open access is appealing in many digital humanities projects, it is not always appropriate, as work with indigenous cultural artifacts has revealed.


Digital humanities Global Borderlands Transnational 


  1. Anzaldua, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Book Company.Google Scholar
  2. Centernet: An International Network of Digital Humanities Centers. 2017. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  3. Christen, Kimberly. 2015. Tribal Archives, Traditional Knowledge, and Local Contexts: Why the ‘s’ Ma Ers. Journal of Western Archives 6(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
  4. de la Cruz, Dulce Maria, Jake Kaupp, Max Kemman, Kristin Lewis, and Teh-Hn Yu. 2015. Mapping Cultures in the Big Tent: Multidisciplinary Networks in the Digital Humanities Quarterly. Accessed 10 Aug 2017.
  5. DH2018: Mexico City. Dh 2018 (blog) 2018. Accessed 10 Aug 2017.
  6. Donadey, Anne. 2007. Overlapping and Interlocking Frames for Humanities Literary Studies: Assia Djebar, Tsitsi Dangarembga. Gloria Anzaldua. College Literature 34(4): 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Earhart, Amy E. 2015. Traces of the Old, Uses of the New: The Emergence of the Digital Literary Studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  8. Galina Russell, Isabel. 2017. Presentation, Panel on Copyright, Digital Humanities, and Global Geographies of Knowledge. Presented at the Digital Humanities 2017, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Gil, Alex. 2014. Around DH in 80 Days. Around DH in 80 Days (blog). Accessed 10 Aug 2017.
  10. Gil, Alex, and Elika Ortega. 2016. Global Outlooks in Digital Humanities: Multilingual Practices and Minimal Computing. In Doing Digital Humanities: Practice, Training, Research, ed. Constance Crompton, Richard J. Lane, and Ray Siemens, 22–34. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Global Outlook::Digital Humanities. 2017. Accessed 10 Aug 2017.
  12. Hayles, Katherine. 2010. My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kirschenbaum, Matthew. 2012. What is Digital Humanities and What’s It Doing in English Departments? In Debates in the Digital Humanities, ed. Matthew Gold, 3–11. St. Paul: U Minnesota P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Membership. ADHO (blog). 2018. Accessed 10 Aug 2017.
  15. O’Donnell, Daniel Paul, Katherine L. Walter, Alex Gil, and Neil Fraistat. 2016. Only Connect: The Globalization of the Digital Humanities. In A New Companion to the Digital Humanities, ed. Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth, 493–510. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Pannapacker, William. 2009. The Brainstorm Blog: The Chronicle of Higher Education Online.Google Scholar
  17. Ray Murray, Padmini. 2017. Presentation, Panel on Copyright, Digital Humanities, and Global Geographies of Knowledge. Presented at the Digital Humanities 2017, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  18. Risam, Roopika. 2017. Other worlds, other DHs: Notes towards a DH Accent. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32(2): 377–384.Google Scholar
  19. SIGs: ADHO Special Interest Groups (SIGs). 2017. ADHO (blog). Accessed 3 Nov 2017.
  20. Terras, Melissa. 2006. Disciplined: Using Educational Studies to Analyse ‘Humanities Computing’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 21(2): 229–246.Google Scholar
  21. Terras, Melissa. 2011. Quantifying Digital Humanities. UCL Centre for Digital Humanities. Accessed 5 Nov 2017.
  22. Weingart, Scott B., and Nickoal Eichmann-Kalwara. 2017. What’s Under the Big Tent? A Study of ADHO Conference Abstracts. Digital Studies/Le Champ Numerique 7: 6. Scholar

Copyright information

© Fudan University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations