Beyond Green Capitalism: Social–Ecological Transformation and Perspectives of a Global Green-Left

  • Ulrich BrandEmail author
Original Paper


Given certain reactions to the ecological crisis as part of the multiple crisis of capitalism (like the so-called energy transition in Germany), a new mode of development might emerge which can be called green capitalism. This would shift the terrain of social critique and emancipatory social struggles. The paper introduces the debate on “social–ecological transformation” which emerged as a radical part of a more comprehensive debate on “great” or “societal transformation” and highlights its core issues: the issue of a necessary attractive mode of production and living for all, the role of pioneers of change and changing political and economic institutions, the acknowledgment of shifting social practices, the requirement for alternative imaginaries or “stories” of a good life as part of a contested process which is called “futuring.” As an example for alternative imaginaries, the current debate on “degrowth” is outlined and evaluated. The second part of the paper focuses more concretely on issues around the formation and existence of a global green-left. After mentioning a crucial problem for any global alternative—i.e., the structural feature of economic and geopolitical competition which historically divided the global Left and pulled it into compromises at national or regional scales—four requirements or characteristics of a global green-left are highlighted: to weaken and change capitalistically driven competition and competitiveness, to push a social–ecological transformation in democratic ways and not at the back of ordinary people (like conservative and liberal proposals for transformation tend to do), to link more systematically green issues with labor issues and, finally, to transform the overall dispositive of political action from a “distributive” to a “transformative Left.” One dimension of such an enhancement, it is concluded, is a broader understanding of the “economy” itself by acknowledging the demands and achievements of a “care revolution” which will be crucial for an alternative mode of production and living.


Green capitalism Social–ecological transformation Ecological civilization Global Left Futuring Degrowth Marxism 


  1. Biesecker, Adelheid, and Sabine Hofmeister. 2010. (Re)productivity: Sustainable relations both between society and nature and between the genders. Ecological Economics 69(8): 1703–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brand, Ulrich, and Markus Wissen. 2013. Crisis and continuity of capitalist society–nature relationships. The imperial mode of living and the limits to environmental governance. Review of International Political Economy 20(4): 687–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brand, Ulrich, and Markus Wissen. 2015. Social–ecological transformation. In International encyclopedia of geography. People, the earth, environment, and technology, ed. Noel Castree, Michael Goodchild, Weidong Liu, Audrey Kobayashi, Richard Marston, and Douglas Richardson. Hoboken: Wiley/Association of American Geographers.Google Scholar
  4. Brand, Ulrich, Christoph Görg, and Markus Wissen. 2011. Second-order condensations of societal power relations. Environmental politics and the internationalization of the state from a neo-poulantzian perspective. Antipode 43(1): 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demirović, Alex. 1997. Demokratie und Herrschaft. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  6. Gallas, Alexander, Lars Bretthauer, John Kannankulam, and Ingo Stützle (eds.). 2011. Reading poulantzas. London: Merling Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gramsci, Antonio. 1991. In Prison notebooks, German Edition (Gefängnishefte), ed. Klaus Bochmann and Wolfgang Fritz Haug. Hamburg/Berlin: Argument.Google Scholar
  8. Hirsch, Joachim. 1994. Politische form, politische Institutionen und Staat. In Politik, Institutionen und Staat. Zur Kritik der Regulationstheorie, ed. Josef Esser, Christoph Görg, and Joarchim Hisch, 157–212. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
  9. Huan, Qingzhi. 2014. Development of the red-green environmental movement in china: A preliminary analysis. Capitalism Nature Socialism 22(3): 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kallis, Giorgos. 2011. In defence of degrowth. Ecological Economics 70(5): 873–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klein, Dieter. 2013. Das Morgen tanzt im Heute. Transformation im Kapitalismus und über ihn hinaus. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
  12. Marx, Karl. 1977[1867]. Capital. A critique of political economy, vol. I. New York: International (quoted from the German edition, Marx-Engels-Werke 23, Berlin: Dietz).Google Scholar
  13. Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 1969 [1845–1846]. The German ideology. New York: International (quoted from the German edition, Marx-Engels-Werke 3, Berlin: Dietz).Google Scholar
  14. Marx, Karl, and Frederick Engels. 1998 [1848]. The communist manifesto. In The communist manifesto now, socialist register, ed. Leo Panitch and Colin Leys, 240–268. London/New York: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mitchell, Timothy. 2011. Carbon democracy. Political power in the age of oil. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  16. Revelli, Marco. 1999. Die gesellschaftliche Linke. Jenseits der Zivilisation der Arbeit. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  17. Rilling, Rainer. 2014. Transformationals futuring. In Futuring. Perspektiven der Tranformation im Kapitalismus und über ihn hinaus, ed. Michael Brie, 12–48. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  18. Schneider, Francois, Giorgos Kallis, and Joan Martinez Alier. 2010. Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(6): 511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thie, Hans. 2013. Rotes Grün. Pioniere und Prinzipien einer ökologischen Gesellschaft. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Fudan University 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations