Abstract
Cultural symbols serve as one of the most direct and tangible representations of culture spreading, including for the dissemination of Chinese civilization. This study embarks on an exploratory analysis and comparison of the portrayal of these ‘Chinese cultural symbols’ by Chinese and international mainstream large language models. Our findings reveal that calligraphy, Confucian philosophy, the Forbidden City, Peking Opera, and the Great Wall constitute the top five Chinese cultural symbols that receive the most attention from large language models. However, the depiction of the “Chinese cultural landscape” by current large language models predominantly concentrates on elements of traditional humanities and social sciences, with a noticeable absence of China’s contemporary development and technological accomplishments. Concurrently, there are significant disparities in the representation of “Chinese cultural symbols” between domestic and international large language models. This includes issues such as the international models deficiency in providing a holistic portrayal of China’s Political Ideologies and Institutional Systems. In light of these findings, this study proposes strategic suggestions and recommendations for promoting exchanges and mutual learning among civilizations in the era of large language models.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data utilized in this study are presented in the form of charts and tables within the text.
Code availability
This study did not utilize any code.
References
China News Network. 2008. Foreign media ranks top 20 Chinese cultural symbols: Chinese language tops the list, Chairman Mao included. https://www.chinanews.com.cn/cul/news/2008/11-20/1456080.shtml.
Dai, Y., and X. Cheng. 2022. Global communication of Chinese culture in the digital era: internal motivation and external challenges. International Communication of Chinese Culture 9: 127–137.
Dan, Yu., and Yang Yueming. 2015. The core proposition of China’s cultural going out strategy is supply and demand dual-wheel drive-based on a survey of the cognition of Chinese culture by the people of six countries. People’s Tribune. https://doi.org/10.16619/j.cnki.rmlt.2015.24.001.
Hongzhong, Zhang, and Liu Yanrong. 2011. Analysis of American college students’ perception of China’s cultural soft power. Modern Communication (Journal of Communication University of China). https://doi.org/10.19997/j.cnki.xdcb.2011.06.004.
Hu, H.P. 2003. Cultural significance of overseas Chinese literature in the context of globalization. Seeker 03: 209–211. https://doi.org/10.16059/j.cnki.cn43-1008/c.2003.03.074.
Hu, Q.L. 2011. Advantages and Paths of the Spread of Lingnan culture. Journal of Wuyi University (Social Science Edition), 04: 29–32.
Jiang, F., and J. Peng. 2022. New context of global communication ecology in the digital age. International Communications, 11: 13–17.
Liu, X. 2021. Machine intelligence production: tracing, features, and ethical challenges of media intelligence integration. China Radio & TV Academic Journal, 05: 16–19.
Luan, Y.M. 2018. A study on the reduction of cultural discounts in international communication through artificial intelligence. International Communications, 04: 58–60.
Shi, A.B., and C.X. Yang. 2022. The changes in international communication and the rise of elemental soft power: content, channels, and audience. International Communications, 11: 4–8.
Tu, L.B., and X.H. Tian. 2020. Complex environment of lnternational public opinion faced by China amid Covid-19 pandemic manifestation causes and effects. Contemporary World. https://doi.org/10.19422/j.cnki.ddsj.2020.11.009.
Wu, B. 1998. History of the overseas dissemination of Chinese culture. Xi’an: Shaanxi People’s Publishing House.
Wu, Y. 2020. The historical evolution and future trend of the global internet public opinion ecosystem. Frontiers Academic Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.16619/j.cnki.rmltxsqy.2020.15.009.
Ying, Wu., and Qiao Lijuan. 2021. Global communication strategy and path for the construction of a culturally strong country. Youth Journalist. https://doi.org/10.15997/j.cnki.qnjz.2021.06.003.
Zhang, C.Y. 2014. Overseas popularization of Chinese culture. Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Teaching & Studying Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition). https://doi.org/10.16802/j.cnki.ynsddw.2014.01.003.
Zhang, H.Z., Y.B. Wang, W.J. Ren, and S.Q. Liu. 2023. Supernodes of the crowd? Human-machine network structure used by Al large models. Journalism and Mass Communication. https://doi.org/10.15897/j.cnki.cn51-1046/g2.20231107.003.
Zhu, W., and X. Wang. 2021. Three-dimensional space big data network association characterization. Scientia Sinica(Informationis), no. 11: 1802–1839.
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The author confirms sole responsibility for the following: study conception and design, data coding, analysis and interpretation of results, and manuscript preparation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Not applicable.
Ethical Statement
We hereby declare that this manuscript is the result of collaboration among six authors under the guidance of reviewers' comments. Except for the quoted content, this manuscript does not contain any research findings previously published or authored by other individuals or groups.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., He, Y., Xia, Y. et al. Exploring the representation of Chinese cultural symbols dissemination in the era of large language models. Int. Commun. Chin. Cult (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40636-024-00293-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40636-024-00293-z