‘National studies’ (guoxue 国学) became a hot topic in China in the 1990s. Since then, national studies masters, national studies academies and national studies classes have mushroomed all over China. The craze for reading ancient classics has become an interesting social phenomenon. China’s economic growth has resulted in stronger cultural and political confidence. Beyond this, at least three different questions are pertinent for the discussion about national studies in China: Do national studies in China pre-suppose a nation-state? Is the scope of national studies in China limited to Confucianism? What kind of spirit or faith does national studies in China try to foster? These are questions that are not easy to answer, but to ignore them would raise even more questions. In order to facilitate a rational understanding of the discussion about national studies in China, this paper will focus on the origin of the notion of national studies in China and its relationship to similar studies, including national studies in Japan (kokugaku 国学). Analyzing their characteristics, this paper will also reflect on the kinds of problems national studies in China are likely to face.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Sang (2010, p. 246).
Sang (2010, p. 246).
Cheng (1934, p. 216).
On the significance of Lutheran Reformation, Quentin Skinner observed, “He first of all devalues the significance of the Church as a visible institution. If the attainment of fiducia constitutes the sole means by which the Christian can hope to be saved, no place is left for the orthodox idea of the Church as an authority interposed and mediating between the individual believer and God. The true Church becomes nothing more than an invisible congregatio fidellium, a congregation of the faithful gathered in God’s name.” The observation above could be also applied for analyzing the ultimate effects of national studies in Japan. See Quentin (2009, p. 10). Also see Wang (2005).
Murasaki (1975, p. 283).
See Wang (2010).
Motoori (1989, p. 5).
Keneko (1919, p. 107).
Huang (2010, p. 3).
Xu (2010, p. 58).
Xiao (2010), p. 133).
Fan (2010, p.172).
Bellah (1985. P. 102).
Bellah, R. N. (1985). Tokugawa religion: The cultural roots of modern Japan. London: The Free Press.
Cao, J. (1991). Chunlei Chudong zhi Guoguxue [The rise of national studies]. In X. Xu (Ed.), A collection on the national studies, [Guoguxue Taolunji] (pp. 88–89). Shanghai: Shanghai Shudian Press.
Chen, Z. (2012). Yu Yingshih Fangtanlu [A dialogue with Professor Yu Yingshih] (pp. 90–91). Hong Kong: Chungwa book.
Cheng, F. (1934). Guoxue Yundong de Wojian [My opinion about the ‘national studies’ movement]. In Z. Ruoying (Ed.), The collection of chinese new literary movement, [Zhongguo Xinwenxue Yundong Shiliao]. Shanghai: Guangming Shuju Press.
Fan, B. (2010). Wo zhi guocui baocun guan [My opinions on preserving the national essence]. In S. Bing (Ed.), The history of national studies. Beijing: Nationla Library Press University.
Hisamatsu, S. (1943). Tamakatsuma and Uiyamabumi. In M. Kyogakukyoku (Ed.), Japanese spirit series (Vol. 57, pp. 1–2). Tokyo: Naikaku Yinsatrukyoku.
Huang, J. (2010). Guocui baocun zhuyi [Protectionism in national essence]. In S. Bing (Ed.), The history of national studies. Beijing: Nationla Library PressUniversity.
Keneko, K. (1919). Shin Sen Kokutai Ronsan. Tokyo: Dainippon Kokutaikai.
Liu, M. (2008). Lun Guoxue [On the national studies](pp. 11–56). Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe.
Minamoto, R. (1990). Tokugawa Shiso Shoshi [A brief history of tokugawa religion] (pp. 177–178). Tokyo: Choou Koron Sha.
Motoori, N. (1989). Motoori Norinaga Zenshu [The complete works of Motoori Norinaga] (2nd ed.). Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.
Murasaki, S. (1975). The maiden. In T. Yamagishi (Ed.), The tale of Genji (Vol. 2, p. 283). Tokyo: Iwanami Sheten
Quentin, S. (2009). The foundations of modern political thought: Volume 2 The age of reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sang, B. (2010). Guoxue yu Hanxue [National studies and han studies] (pp. 245–246). Beijing: Zhonguo Renmin Daxue Chubanshe.
Song, S. (1993). In H. Zhusheng (Ed.) Songshuji (Vol. 2, pp. 46–48). Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju
Wang, X. (2005). The Japanese terms ‘Shokubun’, ‘Seken’ and the Japanese spirit of capitalism. In A. Carlson & R. Xiao (Eds.), East Asia studies (2nd ed., Vol. 36, pp. 25–54). Taipei: Graduate Institute of East Asia Studies, National Chengchi University.
Wang, X. (2010). The Japanese traditional view of Hanzi and its indigenous faith of language. In C. Littleto (Ed.), Disquisitions on the past & present (Vol. 21, pp. 63–82). Taipei: Institute of History & Philology, Academia Sinica.
Xiao, G. (2010). Kexue guoxue bingzhong lun [On equal Importance of science and national studies]. In S. Bing (Ed.), The History of National Studies. Beijing: Nationla Library Press University.
Xu, S. (2010). Guocui wuzuyu ouhua [Preserving national essence despite of Europeanization]. In S. Bing (Ed.), The history of national studies. Beijing: Nationla Library Press University.
Zhang, D. (1991). Guoxue Jinlun [Commentary on “national studies”] (pp. 1–2). Shenyang: Shenyang Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
Zhu, W. (2011). The questions and answers on national studies. Guoxue dawen [Book Town], 9, 1–8.
This paper was originally presented as an invited talk at Stockholm Confucius Institute Annual Lecture 2011, Organized in cooperation with Institute for Security and Development Policy. Stockholm University, 07, Dec, 2011. I would like to thank Professor Qian Suoqiao who helped me to prepare this paper in English. I also thank Professor Loden, Torbjörn for his valuable comments and advice on this paper.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X. “National studies” in China and Japan. Int. Commun. Chin. Cult 3, 413–426 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40636-016-0062-1
- National studies
- Pre-modern intellectual thought