Designing of a sustainable forest policy is of extreme importance in our present world where the process of rapid economic growth is causing imbalance in the climatic cycles by denying ecosystems sufficient time for adaptation and the socioeconomic systems adequate opportunity for mitigation. In this paper, the forests are considered highly resilient natural resource that plays a major role in reducing the impact of global climate change through carbon sequestration, heat absorption, watershed protection, acid deposition, etc. This paper examines the prospect of sustainable forest management for an emerging economy like India, where forest coverage has gone up over the last three decades in spite of population growth, rapid urbanization, and fast economic growth. To assess the possibility of sustainable future growth in a globally congenial environment, the extent of ecological stress on Indian economy has been checked and pattern of public as well as private expenditure along with import and export of forestry and related products analyzed. The import of forestry-based products are increasing in terms of volume, value and unit prices throughout this period and the major importers of raw and semi-finished forestry-based inputs are the South and East Asian countries. From the perspective of material balance, the results of structural decomposition analysis reveal increasing dominance of economic growth over other effects indicating necessity of designing intervention to decouple potential future economic growth from forest resources to ensure long run sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
BRIC stands for Brazil–Russia–India–China.
The I–O tables are in the form of square matrices showing in each row the disposal (use) of output of a sector as input used in different sectors (intermediate use) and for final use in the economy during the year. They cover all sectors of the economy and their subsectors.
Sector codes are taken from 1993–1994 round of I–O tables in CSO site.
Managed forest means a sustainable forest in which usually at least one tree is planted for every tree felled.
This section is taken from Bit and Banerjee (2015).
Initially the Forest Department was clubbed with the Department of Agriculture and later it became a part of the environment department.
Aggarwal A, Mishra TK, Nagaraja BC, Maiti SK, Mandal DK, Ramprasad V, Jagannatha Rao R, Bhat PR, Nagendra MDV, Khan H (2004) Joint forest management: lessons from case studies. In: Ravindranath NH, Sudha P (eds) Joint Forest Management in India- Spread, Performance and Impact. Universities Press, Hyderabad, pp 180–195
Banerjee S, Bit J (2014) Forest conservation in India: an inquiry into economic linkages and long-run sustainability. CBS J Manag Pract 1(2):19–28
Bit J (2014) Sustainable forest conservation in India: economic linkages and livelihood dependence. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Science) in Economics, Department of Economics, University of Calcutta
Bit J, Banerjee S (2014) Consumption of wood products and dependence on imports: a study on post-reform India. Foreign Trade Rev 49(3):263–290
Bit J, Banerjee S (2015) Sustainable forest use and India’s economic growth: a structural decomposition analysis of direct forest intensity. In: Dinda S (ed) Handbook of research on climate change impact on health and environmental sustainability, IGI Global, USA (forthcoming)
Bradshaw CJA, Giam X, Sodhi NS (2010) Evaluating the relative environmental impact of countries. PLoS One 5(5). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010440
Butler R (2010) Protecting their rainforest: Amazon tribes embrace technology to save land, culture. http://digitalmagazinetechnology.com/a/?KEY=geoworld-10-04april#page=15Accessed 10 June 2011
Chenery B, Watanabe T (1958) International comparisons of the structure of production. Econometrica 26(4):487–521
Chopra K (2006) Informal sector contribution to GDP: a study of the forestry sector. http://mospi.nic.in/GDP%2003.doc. Accessed 20 June 2013
Chopra K, Kumar P (2003) Forest biodiversity and timber extraction: an analysis of the interaction of market and non-market mechanism. EEE Working Papers Series 8
Dhanagare DN (2000) Joint forest management in UP: people, panchayats and women. Econ Polit Wkly 35(37):3315–3324
Dietzenbacher E, Los B (1998) Structural decomposition techniques: sense and sensitivity. Econ Syst Res 10(4):307–324
Dutta M, Roy S, Saha S, Maity DS (2004) Forest protection policies and local benefits from NTFP—lessons from West Bengal. Econ Polit Wkly 39(6):587–591
Fikreyesus S, Kebebew Z, Nebiyu A, Zeleke N, Bogale S (2011) Allelopathic effects of Eucalyptus camaldulensis dehnh—on germination and growth of tomato. Am–Eur J Agric Environ Sci 11(5):600–608
Ghate R, Ghate S (2010) Joint forest management, role of communication and harvesting behaviour: evidence from field experiments in India. SANDEE Working Paper No. 53–10
Haan MD (2001) A structural decomposition analysis of pollution in the Netherlands. Econ Syst Res 13(2):181–196
Haripriya GS, Parikh JK (1998) Socioeconomic development and demand for timber products—a panel data analysis. Glob Environ Change 8(3):249–262
Harris J (2006) Ecosystem management: forest and water systems. In: Proceedings of environmental and natural resource economics: a contemporary approach. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, pp 327–353
http://data.gov.in/sites/default/files/FOREST_COVER_AREA_1.xls. Accessed 10th May 2013
http://mahenvis.nic.in/Pdf/Forests_.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2014
http://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/. Accessed 20 Feb 2014
Jones LP (1976) The measurement of Hirschmanian linkages. Quart J Econ 90(2):323–333
Joshi A (1999) Progressive bureaucracy: an oxymoron? The case of joint forest management in India. Rural Development Forestry Network. Network paper 24a—Winter 1998/1999
Lele S (2011) Rethinking forest governance: towards a perspective beyond JFM, the Godavarman case and FRA. The Hindu Survey of the Environment, pp 95–103
Lenzen M (2003) Environmentally important paths, linkages and key sectors in the Australian economy. Struct Change Econ Dyn 14:1–34
Mattila T, Leskinen P, Mäenpää I, Seppälä J (2011) An environmentally extended input–output analysis to support sustainable use of forest resources. Open For Sci J 4:15–23
McDermott CL (2012) Plantations and communities: key controversies and trends in certification standards. FSC Certified Plantations and Local Communities workshop: Overview paper. Forest Stewardship Council
Mendelsohn R, Dinar A, Sanghi A (2001) The effect of development on the climate sensitivity of agriculture. Environ Dev Econ 6:85–101
Mizrach B (1992) The distribution of the Theil U-statistic in bivariate normal populations. Econ Lett 38(2):163–167
Mukherjee N (1995) Forest management and survival needs: community experience in West Bengal. Econ Polit Wkly 30(49):3130–3132
Mukherji S (2004) Fragile environment. Manak Publications Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
Mukhopadhyay K, Forssell O (2005) An empirical investigation of air pollution from fossil fuel combustion and its impact on health in India during 1973–1974 to 1996–1997. Ecol Econ 55:235–250
Muñoz JP, Hubacek K (2008) Material implication of Chile’s economic growth: combining material flow accounting (MFA) and structural decomposition analysis (SDA). Ecol Econ 65:136–144
Paloviita, A (2004) Matrix sustainability: applying input–output analysis to environmental and economic sustainability indicators—case: Finnish forest sector. Jyväskylä Studies in Business and Economics, vol 35
Pandey DN (2014) Traditional knowledge systems for biodiversity conservation. http://www.infinityfoundation.com/mandala/t_es/t_es_pande_conserve.htm Accessed 9 Aug 2014
Patil KKR, Manjunatha GR, Chandrakanth MG (2013) Economic impact of institutions on the consumption of forest products in India. Indian J Agric Econ 68(2):155–168
Pearce D, Cline W, Achanta A, Fankhauser S, Pachauri R, Tol R, Vellinga P (1996) The social cost of climate change: greenhouse damage and the benefits of control. In: Bruce J, Lee H, Haites E (eds) Climate change 1995: economic and social dimensions of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Psaltopoulos D, Thomson KJ (1993) Input–output evaluation of rural development: a forestry-centred application. J Rural Stud 9(4):351–358
Rai KN, Niwas S, Khatkar RK (1983) Demand and supply analysis of forest products in India. Indian J Agric Econ 39(3):300–308
Rasmussen PN (1956) Studies in inter-sectoral relations. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Reis H, Rua A (2006) An input-output analysis: linkages versus leakages. Working Papers 17, Banco de Portugal
Roberts D (1999) Scottish forestry: an input–output analysis. Macaulay Land Use Research Institute with John Clegg & Co. and the University Of Aberdeen
Rojas I (2012) What’s wrong with tree plantations? http://print.news.mongabay.com/2012/0921-plantations-commentary-rojas.html. Accessed 4 Mar 2014
Roy S, Dutta M, Bandopadhyay S (2001) Joint forest management and forest protection committees: negotiation systems and the design of incentives—a case study of West Bengal. EERC Working Paper Series: CPR-8
Sivaramakrishnan K (1997) A limited forest conservancy in southwest Bengal. J Asian Stud 56(1):75–112
Stone S, Leóne MC (2010) Climate change and the role of forests—a community manual. Conservation International. www.conservation.org/climate_change_and_the_role_of_forests. Accessed 26 April 2015
Sudha P, Malhotra KC, Palit S, Kameswara Rao K, Srinivas M, Negi NK, Tiwari BK, Misra TK, Jagannatha Rao R, Bhat PR, Murthy IK, Ravindranath NH (2004) Joint forest management: synthesis of its spread, performance and impact in Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Tripura and West Bengal. In: Joint forest management in India—spread, performance and impact. Universities Press, Hyderabad, pp 196–219
Thompson I, Mackey B, McNulty S, Mosseler A (2009) Forest resilience, biodiversity, and climate change—a synthesis of the biodiversity/resilience/stability relationship in forest ecosystems. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal. Technical Series no. 43
Tianjie M (2013) Interconnected forests: global and domestic impacts of China’s forestry conservation. China Environment Forum. Wilson Center. http://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/interconnected-forests-global-and-domestic-impacts-chinas-forestry-conservation. Accessed 25 Nov 2013
UNEP (2012) The role of forest for the Kenyan economy. Report for UNEP, Nairobi
www.rbi.org.in. Accessed 15 Mar 2014
Zhang C, Fu S (2010) Allelopathic effects of leaf litter and live roots exudates of Eucalyptus species on crops. Allelopath J 26(1):91–100
About this article
Cite this article
Banerjee, S., Bit, J. Economic growth versus climate balancing: some reflections on the sustainable management of forest resource in India. Decision 42, 127–145 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-015-0090-4
- Sustainable forest management
- Forward linkage of forestry sector
- Direct, indirect and induced demand for forestry
- Trade-flows in forest products
- Direct material intensity of forestry
- Structural decomposition analysis