Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Report on an Italian survey of 72 stuck hemodialysis catheters

  • original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Reports of stuck hemodialysis catheters have been on the rise in recent years. Aim of this work is to report how this complication has been managed and the relative outcomes in a multicente Italian survey.

Methods

Since 2012, the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN) Project Group of Vascular Access has collected data among nephrologists on this complication. Data regarding 72 cases of stuck tunnelled central venous catheter (tCVC) in 72 patients were retrieved thanks to this survey.

Results

In 11 patients (15%) the stuck catheter was directly buried or left in place. Sixty-one cases were managed through advanced removal techniques. Among these, 47 (77%) stuck tunnelled central venous catheters were successfully removed, while 14 (23%) failed to be withdrawn. Considering removed tCVCs, the use of endoluminal balloon dilatation alone or in combination with other tools showed a percentage of success of 88%. The removal procedure involved numerous specialists. Some complications occurred, such as breakage of the line or bleeding, and two cases of haemopericardium during an advanced procedure.

Conclusion

The survey shows how the stuck catheter complication was managed in different ways, with conflicting results. When utilized, endoluminal balloon dilatation proved to be the most effective and most often utilized technique, while some cases had suboptimal management or failure. This underlines how delicate the procedure is, and the need for both precise knowledge of this complication and timely organization of removal attempts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FülopT TMB, Agarwal M, Lopez-Ruiz A, Molnar MZ, Dossabhloy NR (2017) Bedside tunnelled dialysis catheter removal—a lesson learned from nephrology trainees. Artif Organs 41(9):810–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xiang DZ, Verbeken EK, Van Lommel AT, Stas M, De Wever I (1998) Composition and formation of the sleeve enveloping a central venous catheter. J Vasc Surg 28(2):260–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vellanki VS, Watson D, Rajan DK, Bhola CB, Lok CE (2015) The stuck catheter: a hazardous twist to the meaning of permanent catheters. J Vasc Access 16(4):289–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ibeas J, Roca-Tey R, Vallespin J et al (2017) Spanish clinical guidelines on vascular access for haemodialysis. Guia Clin Esp Acceso Vasc Para Hemodial 37(Suppl 1):1–191

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hong JH (2010) (2010) An easy technique for the removal of a hemodialysis catheter stuck in central veins. J Vasc Access 11:59–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong JH (2011) A breakthrough technique for the removal of a hemodialysis catheter stuck in the central vein: endoluminal balloon dilatation of the stuck catheter. J Vasc Access 12(4):381–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Quaretti P, Galli F, Fiorina I, Moramarco LP, Spina M, Forneris G, Torresi M, Bellazzi R (2014) A refinement of Hong’s technique for the removal of stuck dialysis catheters: an easy solution to a complex problem. J Vasc Access 15(3):183–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Foley PT, Carter RM, Uberoi R (2007) Endovascular removal of long-term hemodialysis catheters. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30:1079–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lodi M, Ebrahimi RF, Pezzotti P, Carbonari L (2016) The removal of a stuck catheter: an alternative to Hong’s technique. J Vasc Access 17(6):548–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carillo R, Garisto JD, Salman L, Merrill D, Asif A (2009) A novel technique for tethered dialysis catheter removal using the laser sheath. Semin Dial 22:688–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Idowu O, Brown J, Kim S, Kim S (2016) Mechanics of a stuck central venous catheter removal. J Pediatr Surg 51(5):872–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.04.001 (Epub 2016 Apr 9)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcarek J, Gołębiowski T, Letachowicz K et al (2016) Balloon dilatation for removal of an irretrievable permanent hemodialysis catheter: the safest approach. Artif Organs 40(5):E84–E88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Akgun S, Ak K, Tugrular S, Civelek A, Isbir C, Arsn S (2008) Median sternotomy for an unexpected complication of permanent hemodialysis catheters: ‘“stuck catheter.”’ Vasa 37:293–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan A, Khaffa M, Al-Akira M, Lord R, Davenport A (2006) Six cases of retained central venous hemodialysis access catheters. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:2005–2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McIntyre CW, Taal MW, Fluck RJ, Hinwood D (2003) Adherence of tunneled hemodialysis catheter to superior vena cava stent: successful percutaneous removal. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18:432–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thein H, Ratanjee SK (2005) Tethered hemodialysis catheter with retained portions in central vein and right atrium on attempted removal. Am J Kidney Dis 46:E35–E39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Forneris G, Savio D, Quaretti P, Fiorina I, Cecere P, Pozzato M, Trogolo M, Roccatello D (2014) Dealing with stuck hemodialysis catheter: state of the art and tips for the nephrologist. J Nephrol 27:619–625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Forneris G, Comelli S, Savio D et al (2015) Thirty-seven cases of stuck catheter: results of an Italian survey. Nephrol Dial Transplant 30(Suppl 3):iii571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Noordzij M, Jager KJ, van der Veer SN, Kramar R, Collart F, Heaf JF, Stojceva-Taneva O, Leivestad T, Buturovic-Ponivkar J, Benitez Sànchez M, Moreso F, Prütz KG, Severn A, Wanner C, Vanholder R, RAvani P, (2014) Use of vascular access for hemodialysis in Europe: a report form ERA-EDTA Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 29(10):1956–1964. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfu253 (Epub 2014 Jul 24)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pisoni RL, Zepel L, Fluck R, Lol CE, Kawanishi H, Süleymanlar G, Wasse H, Tentori F, Zee J, Li Y, Schaubel D, Burke S, Robinson B (2018) International differences in the location and use of arteriovenous accesses created for hemodialysis: results from the dialysis outcomes and practise patterns study (DOPPS). Am J Kidney Dis. 71(4):469–478. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.09.012 (Epub 2017 Dec 1)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Talreja H, Ryan SE, Graham J, Sood MM, Hadziomerovic A, Edward Clark, Hiremath S (2017) Endoluminal dilatation for embedded hemodialysis catheters: a case–control study of factors associated with embedding and clinical outcomes. PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174061

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hong JH (2018) Comments on a stripping method to remove stuck catheter and a plea to adopt large size hemodialysis catheters. J Vasc Access 19(1):103–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Perandini S, Lucarelli A, Beleu A, Montemezzi S (2020) Totally percutaneous endoluminal balloning of stuck hemodialisys cathether: one year experience of a referral center. J Vasc Access 2(3):395–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jafar A, Tutone VK, Hawkins SP (2018) Successful removal of stuck and infected haemodialysis catheter via endoluminal balloon dilatation after unsuccessful surgical cut-down. Nephrology 23:93–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Field M, Pugh J, Asquith J, Davies S, Pherwani AD (2008) A stuck hemodialysis central venous catheter. J Vasc Access 9(4):301–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reddy A, Stnagl A, Radbill B (2010) Retained catheter fragment from a fractured tunnelled catheter—a rare and potentially lethal complication. Semin Dial 23(5):536–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tazzioli G, Gargaglia E, Vecchioni I, Papi S, Di Blasio P (2015) Rossi E (2015) Retained embolized fragment of totally implantable central venous catheter in right ventricle: it is really necessary to remove? J Vasc Access 16(5):431–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To all centres and colleagues participating in the survey. Acquaviva delle Fonti (C. Lomonte), Agrigento (A. Granata), Alba (A. Campo), Asti (N. Giotta), Borgomanero (S. Cusinato), NS di Bonaria San Gavino M.le (M, Spina), Carbonia (K. Rosas), Catania (W. Morale), Chieri (M. Salomone), Chivasso (G. Martina), Ivrea (M. Francisco), Lecce (F. Russo), Legnano (M. Cornacchiari), Modena (L. Lucchi), Palmanova (M. Tosto), Pavia (P. Quaretti), Pescara (M. Lodi), Pinerolo (A. Marciello), Rivoli (S. Ferrero), Roma Gemelli (L. Tazza), Salerno (M. Punzi), San Giovanni Rotondo (G. Gatta), San Miniato (V. Finato), Senigallia (S. Cenerelli), Torino CTO (D. Damiani), Torino G. Bosco (P. Cecere), Torino Martini (G. Cesano), Torino Mauriziano (S. Berutti), Torino Città della Salute (G. Leonardi), Verona (V. Bedogna).

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Survey project, material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by GF, DS and AM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Giacomo Forneris and reviewed by DR. All authors commented on the previous version; all authors sent cases, read and contributed to the discussion of results and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giacomo Forneris.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors disclose all relationship or interest that could have direct or potential influence or impart bias in the work.

Research involving human participating and/or animals

This study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained where possible retrospectively and all data acquired anonymously. The study describes data collected on a procedure with no currently available alternatives and regulated by a dedicated specific integrated care pathways protocol of the Piedmont Region (North West Italy).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forneris, G., Savio, D., Quaretti, P. et al. Report on an Italian survey of 72 stuck hemodialysis catheters. J Nephrol 36, 359–365 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01474-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01474-y

Keywords

Navigation