Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk of bleeding after percutaneous native kidney biopsy in patients receiving low-dose aspirin: a single-center retrospective study

  • original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although discontinuation of antiplatelet agents at least 5 days before kidney biopsy is commonly recommended, the evidence behind this practice is of low level. Indeed, few non-randomized studies previously showed an equivalent risk of bleeding in patients receiving aspirin therapy.

Methods

We conducted a single center retrospective study comparing the risk of complications after percutaneous native kidney biopsy in patients who received low-dose aspirin (ASA) within 5 days from biopsy and those who did not. The main outcome was the difference in the incidence of major complications (red blood cell transfusion, need for selective arterial embolization, surgery, nephrectomy). Secondary outcomes included difference in minor complications, comparison between patients who received ASA within 48 h or within 3–5 days, identification of independent factors predictive of major complications.

Results

We analyzed data on 750 patients, of whom 94 received ASA within 5 days from biopsy. There were no significant differences in the proportion of major complications in patients receiving or not receiving ASA (2.59% and 3.19%, respectively, percentage point difference 1%, 95% CI − 3 to 4%, p = 0.74). Groups were also comparable for minor complications; among patients receiving ASA, there were no differences in major bleeding between those who received ASA within 48 h or 3–5 days from biopsy. Significant baseline predictors of major bleeding in our cohort were platelet count lower than 120*103/microliter, higher diastolic blood pressure and higher blood urea.

Conclusions

Treatment with low-dose ASA within 5 days from kidney biopsy did not increase the risk of complications after the procedure.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Halimi J-M, Gatault P, Longuet H et al (2020) Major bleeding and risk of death after percutaneous native kidney biopsies. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.14721219

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar V, Mitchell MD, Umscheid CA, Berns JS, Hogan JJ (2018) Risk of complications with use of aspirin during renal biopsy: a systematic review. Clin Nephrol 89(2):67–74. https://doi.org/10.5414/CN109274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mackinnon B, Fraser E, Simpson K, Fox JG, Geddes C (2008) Is it necessary to stop antiplatelet agents before a native renal biopsy? Nephrol Dial Transplant 23(11):3566–3570. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfn282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lees JS, McQuarrie EP, Mordi N, Geddes CC, Fox JG, Mackinnon B (2017) Risk factors for bleeding complications after nephrologist-performed native renal biopsy. Clin Kidney J. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfx012

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Biondi-Zoccai GGL, Lotrionte M, Agostoni P et al (2006) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the hazards of discontinuing or not adhering to aspirin among 50,279 patients at risk for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 27(22):2667–2674. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehl334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Awtry EH, Loscalzo J (2000) Aspirin. Circulation 101(10):1206–1218. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.10.1206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rollino C, Giacchino F, Savoldi S et al (2012) Restrospective analysis of the renal biopsy activity in Piedmont. G Ital Nefrol 29(4):473–483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bollée G, Martinez F, Moulin B et al (2010) Renal biopsy practice in France: results of a nationwide study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25(11):3579–3585. https://doi.org/10.1093/NDT/GFQ254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MacGinley R, Champion De Crespigny PJ, Gutman T et al (2019) KHA-CARI Guideline recommendations for renal biopsy. Nephrology 24(12):1205–1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.13662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hogan JJ, Mocanu M, Berns JS (2016) The native kidney biopsy: update and evidence for best practice. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 11(2):354–356. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.05750515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrari E, Benhamou M, Cerboni P, Marcel B (2005) Coronary syndromes following aspirin withdrawal: a special risk for late stent thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 45(3):456–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACC.2004.11.041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Corapi KM, Chen JLT, Balk EM, Gordon CE (2012) Bleeding complications of native kidney biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 60(1):62–73. https://doi.org/10.1053/J.AJKD.2012.02.330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baffour FI, Hickson LTJ, Stegall MD et al (2017) Effects of aspirin therapy on ultrasound-guided renal allograft biopsy bleeding complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol 28(2):188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVIR.2016.10.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mejía-Vilet JM, Márquez-Martínez MA, Cordova-Sanchez BM, Ibargüengoitia MC, Correa-Rotter R, Morales-Buenrostro LE (2018) Simple risk score for prediction of haemorrhagic complications after a percutaneous renal biopsy. Nephrology (Carlton) 23(6):523–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/NEP.13055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Manno C, Strippoli GFM, Arnesano L et al (2004) Predictors of bleeding complications in percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy. Kidney Int 66(4):1570–1577. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1523-1755.2004.00922.X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Korbet SM, Gashti CN, Evans JK, Whittier WL (2018) Risk of percutaneous renal biopsy of native kidneys in the evaluation of acute kidney injury. Clin Kidney J 11(5):610–615. https://doi.org/10.1093/CKJ/SFY048

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muñoz AT, Valdez-Ortiz R, González-Parra C, Espinoza-Dávila E, Morales-Buenrostro LE, Correa-Rotter R (2011) Percutaneous renal biopsy of native kidneys: efficiency, safety and risk factors associated with major complications. Arch Med Sci 7(5):823–831. https://doi.org/10.5114/AOMS.2011.25557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrulli S, Rossini M, Gigliotti G et al (2022) The risks associated with percutaneous native kidney biopsies: a prospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. https://doi.org/10.1093/NDT/GFAC177

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Monahan H, Gunderson T, Greene E, Schmit G, Atwell T, Schmitz J (2019) Risk factors associated with significant bleeding events after ultrasound-guided percutaneous native renal biopsies: a review of 2204 cases. Abdom Radiol (New York) 44(6):2316–2322. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00261-019-01962-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ali H, Murtaza A, Anderton J, Ahmed A (2015) Post renal biopsy complication rate and diagnostic yield comparing hands free (ultrasound-assisted) and ultrasound-guided biopsy techniques of renal allografts and native kidneys. Springerplus. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40064-015-1292-0

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee “Comitato Etico dell’Area Vasta Emilia Nord”.

Funding

No funding was required for the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FF conceived and designed the study; SC, FG, FB, SG, GL collected the data; FF and GA analyzed the data; FF wrote the manuscript; GM, RM, GC, GD critically revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Fontana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Authors declare no conflict of interest for the present study; the results presented in this paper have not been published previously in whole or part, except in abstract format.

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the appropriate institutional research ethics committee (“Comitato Etico dell’Area Vasta Emilia Nord”) and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fontana, F., Cazzato, S., Giaroni, F. et al. Risk of bleeding after percutaneous native kidney biopsy in patients receiving low-dose aspirin: a single-center retrospective study. J Nephrol 36, 475–483 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01441-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01441-7

Keywords

Navigation