Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

FSGS: from pathogenesis to the histological lesion

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a generic term that in the current terminology can be appropriate for identifying two conditions. First, a morphological pattern of injury characterized by the occlusion of a single or group of glomerular capillary loops by sclerotic material, indicating a precise histological lesion but with a wide range of etiological interpretations. Second, a pauci-immune renal disease called idiopathic or primary FSGS, which is a podocytopathy triggered by an endogenous cytotoxin that recognizes the podocyte as its sole target. Based on the current and past literature, we do not possess practical tools to easily provide a precise classification of an FSGS lesion, although some clues may be of help in everyday clinical practice. Reactive forms, genetic forms, adaptive forms, forms associated with a deregulation of the proliferation and forms secondary to local glomerular inflammation are the etiological classes known to be associated with the development of an FSGS lesion. However, diagnosing each single case based on clinical, serological and histological criteria is still far from easy and mostly depends on the experience of the renal team, which should involve skilled nephrologists and pathologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D’Agati VD, Fogo AB, Bruijn JA et al (2004) Pathologic classification of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a working proposal. Am J Kidney Dis 43(2):368–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barisoni L, Schnaper HW, Kopp JB (2007) A proposed taxonomy for the podocytopathies: a reassessment of the primary nephrotic diseases. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2(3):529–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reggiani F, Ponticelli C (2016) Focal segmental glomerular sclerosis: do not overlook the role of immune response. J Nephrol. doi:10.1007/s40620-016-0272-y

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wei C, El Hindi S, Li J et al (2011) Circulating urokinase receptor as a cause of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Med 17(8):952–960

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Maas RJ, Deegens JK, Wetzels JF (2013) Serum suPAR in patients with FSGS: trash or treasure? Pediatr Nephrol 28(7):1041–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Musetti C, Quaglia M, Cena T et al (2015) Circulating suPAR levels are affected by glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria in primary and secondary glomerulonephritis. J Nephrol 28(3):299–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stokes MB, D’Agati VD (2014) Morphologic variants of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and their significance. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 21(5):400–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Howie AJ, Ferreira MA, Majumdar A et al (2000) Glomerular prolapse as precursor of one type of segmental sclerosing lesions. J Pathol 190(4):478–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagata M, Scharer K, Kriz W (1992) Glomerular damage after uninephrectomy in young rats. I. Hypertrophy and distortion of capillary architecture. Kidney Int 42(1):136–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hill GS, Heudes D, Bariety J (2003) Morphometric study of arterioles and glomeruli in the aging kidney suggests focal loss of autoregulation. Kidney Int 63(3):1027–1036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smeets B, Uhlig S, Fuss A et al (2009) Tracing the origin of glomerular extracapillary lesions from parietal epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 20(12):2604–2615

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonello Pani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angioi, A., Pani, A. FSGS: from pathogenesis to the histological lesion. J Nephrol 29, 517–523 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-016-0333-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-016-0333-2

Keywords

Navigation